[lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update
apisan at unam.mx
apisan at unam.mx
Fri Aug 23 05:17:37 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update
From: apisan at unam.mx
Sylvia,
thank you for taking action on this matter and proceed in a practical way. I explained some background and a proposed resolution.
The discussion may revolve mainly around the best ways to assess whether there is really a community around a proposed TLD, its legitimacy, and so on., And if the proposed estreflejada The Economist Intelligence Unit
Practical to use a case like that of a common culture or language that is more concrete border can return the analysis. Mencion.maya or. Patagonia but We could meet many other cases - by ethnicity, by profession, by language ...
Alejandro Pisanty
---------------------------
Dr.Alejandro Pisanty
Faculty of Chemistry UNAM
3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________
From: sylvia at internautabrasil.org [sylvia at internautabrasil.org]
Posted on: Thursday, August 22, 2013 18:46
To: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: RES: [lac-discuss-es] Re: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update
Dear Alejandro:
acknowledge receipt of the proposed request for comment on "evaluation of
"Communities" around new gTLDs
and request LACRALO members to say whether you agree or ESTN
against, and enven your comments until Thursday 28 at 23 UTC, as
sernecesario gives to incorporate feedback from the community (date
Delivery to ALAC - 29/08 23:59 UTC)
Aqules leave the link with the historical:
https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Community+Priorit
and + Evaluation +% 28CPE% 29 + Guidelines + Update + from + ICANN + Workspace (for
Spanish speakers, who are english but remember there is a tool
down the title that can be used to translate the language of choice
"Translate")
The original is a pdf document in English.
Greetings all,
sylvia
___________________________________________________
Sylvia Herlein
sylvia at internautabrasil.org
Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2014 - http://atlarge.icann.org
Secretary FLUI 2009-2015
sylvia_leite = Skype
----- Mensagem Original -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Dr.
Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
Posted in: Thursday, August 22, 2013 15:20
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Re: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC
Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update
Colleagues,
Annex a request for comments from ALAC that merits
I answer and community outreach estal LACRALO study and
comment. It is the evaluation of "communities" around new
gTLDs and has a maturity date of August 29 at midnight (one
minute before, in UTC).
This issue is of great relevance for the Evaluation and possible aceptacino
rejection of proposals for new domain names for some of hese are
presented on behalf of a particular community (may be the case
some of the proposals. gay and could well be in our
region with names like. maya, or the same. Patagonia or. amazon on a
new version).
In the history of gTLDs are especially a gTLD Pascon Community
success but not without controversy. cat tocevaluar me and vote
to represent a community of language and culture extended more allde
geogrficas borders, and a gTLD controversial and complicated. xxx, for
which to make decisions about whether a community well represented
previously defined and established or not was one of the most complex.
Presentarn surely as these two extreme cases and all points
intermediate in the coming months and years.
The document submitted to consideracin is a table of criteria for
evaluate the accuracy, pre-existence and representation of communities
proposed gTLDs behind now, and thus determine its legtimo or better
right granted to them gTLDs. Msan in gTLDs competitor (several
applicants for the same "string" of characters) these criteria can
lead to the selection between contestants.
The document was prepared by the Economist Intelligence Unit, associated with the
Economist magazine and I think a serious document. The main risk
I see if you adopt this document is that disaggregating force
criteria and tabulate scores in each of them, can lead to
lose sight of the forest for the trees and in the end spend aspermitir
Applications really should not.
Gladly you compartircon the criteria informaciny
experiences mentioned in which I had the opportunity to act as a member
the ICANN Board.
My proposal, which is a motion formally, is to issue a comment
Community reads:
"LACRALO supports the adoption of the document by the Economist Intelligence Unit
on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) in general. Manner
additional LACRALO underlines the need for the evaluation of community
is integrated to ensure the legitimacy of the applicants and the
long-term sustainability of the proposals, without demrito of
evolucina flexibility for it over the years. The
Community gTLDs history of previous rounds must be
consulted and motivate extreme precaution in the analysis ".
Request to the Chair and / or secrete to submit this text to
regulatory processes, whether ordinary or extraordinary aslo requires
calendar ICANN ALAC and to be able to issue if this affirmation
sealado pursuant term.
Also apply to representatives of ALAC LACRALO assume and carry
ALAC's assertion that results from this process of consensus or ballot.
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
---------------------------
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Faculty of Chemistry UNAM
3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the LinkedIn group UNAM,
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________
From: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of ICANN At-Large
Staff [staff at atlarge.icann.org] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013
11:20
To: alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Community
Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update
Dear All,
Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, That have Asked to call for
comments be made on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines
Update < https://community.icann.org/x/1wGMAg>
Economist Intelligence Unit as well as the draft Statement.
Additional information on this statement, can be found on the At-Large
Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update from ICANN
Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/1wGMAg>.
Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by
29-August-2013 23:59 UTC.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/de4306706b.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list