[lac-discuss-en] Voting Candidate NomCom - Staff Appreciation - Proposal

[hcarrascob at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Voting Candidate NomCom - Staff Appreciation - Proposal 
 From: hcarrascob at gmail.com

 Dear Jos, 


 First of all thanks for clearing your absence from 
 teleconference. I knew I had always sb problem 
 you impidiparticipar magnitude. 


 Now regarding your proposal, I disagree. Mainly 
 because you have your mail sealado June 21, 2013 as follows: 


 "The proposal is that LACRALO send the list of candidates 
 for NOMCOM who accepted the nomination to then decide ALAC 
 on these, upon evaluation thereof. This proposal will be 
 open until June 24 (the date is our limit). In case of 
 oppose anyone we send the complete list, as of that date, 
 will be sending a full list to ALAC. " 


 I opposed and many other also.Then I figured that with my objecin 
 will be sufficient to make a choice as has been done 
 traditionally. 


 First of all, I think your attitude is anti-Democratic. Managing 
 rules to the arrangement of those in power does not seem. 


 A LACRALO you're not interested, you are interested in other things, and after that, 
 do whatever it takes. So do not want to continue the tradition 
 Democratic, and make the ballot respectively. Prefer to send "the list" 
 as they do not force the statutes. 


 I do not care if these lines have the effect that I did not leave 
 chosen in the Nomcom. If telling the truth is the consequence, 
 then I assume that consequence. 


 I have a huge disappointment. I realize that the way it is 
 aques politics unfortunate. I do not say against peers 
 participating as candidates Nomcom, are wonderful candidates. 
 I say against you as president. I think your attitude is 
 Democratic or LACRALO benefit. Your not LACRALO candles, your 
 candles by other interests.


 A greeting 


 Humberto 












 El 27/06/2013 12:44 am, JosFrancisco Arce wrote: 
> Estimados,
>
> Primero quiero disculparme por ni haber podido participar ayer de la
> llamada. Tuve unos inconvenientes importantes.
>
> Pero ahora he podido leer los emails y he recibido emails personales y
> quiere aclarar el panorama:
>
> 1) En el dia de ayer se tomo la desicion de ir a una votacion,
> personalmente no la tome y desconozco quien la tomo.
> Si quiero decirles que yo estoy en contra de tal desicion por varios
> motivos. Uno de ellos es que esa desicion la debe tomar la region y deberia
> haberse tomado ayer durante la teleconferencia. Otra es que los plazos
> estan vencidos y debemos ser respetuosos de los mismos cuando podemos
> hacerlo, y creo que este es un caso de ellos.
>
> 2) Debido a los hechos ocurridos creo y propongo suspender la votacion y
> mandar a ALAC la lista de candidatos, y aqui la justificacion: a) Si la
> region quiere ir a votar, como hay desacuerdos, y no hay consenso, primero
> deberia votarse si la mayoria quiere ir a vitacion o no, y si gana el si,
> recien ahi ir a votacion. Ustedes sabes que nuestra region debe funcionar
> por consenso y en caso de no obtenerlo debemos ser respetuosos de todas las
> posiciones.
> b) Nuestra region no esta obligada a especificar el candidato preferencial.
> De todas formas cada uno de ustedes lo puede manifestar en la wiki, donde
> todos, incluso ALAC puede ver esos apoyos.c) Creo que es la solucion que
> concilia los intereses de todos ya que estariamos respetando plazos y ALAC
> podria ver los apoyos a los candidatos en la wiki.
>
> Les mando un saludo afectuoso
>
> Jose Arce.
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org





[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/233a3d2305.html
--]]