[lac-discuss-en] RV: Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework

Tue Jun 25 00:50:17 UTC 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: RV: Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework 
 From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com

 Alexander, all, 

 Alejandro Thank you for calling the attention on this subject. 

 I agree with you that is a matter on which we have been 
 paying attention because the results and recommendations to provide 
 this working group, will impact on our region. 

 Although as you indicate and arises from the recommendations are not going to increase or 
 to reduce the number of regions, or recommended post new RALOs by 
 example, movements are made within each region, spodran 
 impact our region and specifically to LACRALO. 

 Also this report should take into account the needs of the 
 Special Groups Inters (pequeas islands, passes or territories 
 Caribbean, Arab States), for which you should not only consider the 
 geographic diversity, but also cultural diversity, 
 econmicas, language, permitindoles to them be represented 
 within the ICANN structure, without having to modify the 
 within geographic regions. I believe that somehow, the groups 
 forming part of this secciny the decisions taken at 
 respect, may affect us as a region. 

 It also seems important to consider what you mention Alejandro 
 respect of the application of a step territory of being reassigned to another 
 region, which must be required by the local government step territory 
 taking into account the views of the local Internet community. 
 It does not appear very clearly how the report should be such a mechanism.
 However, this step reallocation of territory to a different region, 
 be applied to all constituencies of ICANN (AC / SO / Board) and I 
 seems important to be taken into account. 

 According to the final report I read that we share, before these 
 recommendations can be transmitted formally to the Board of ICANN and 
 after the meeting in Durban, this document will be subject to discussion 
 by the respective AC / SO for a period of 90 days. I think we have 
 sufficient time to discuss this issue internally and try 
 reach a consensus document as THIN. And even if we achieve a 
 consensus document, I think it is a very sensitive issue which must 
 listen respectfully to all opinions that arise around this 
 matter. 

 Best regards, 

 Fatima 

 The June 23, 2013 23:15 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch 
<apisan at unam.mx> wrote: 

> Hola,
>
> anexo mensaje sobre el grupo de trabajo de Regiones Geográficas de ICANN,
> que entra a período de comentarios por la comunidad. Me parece importante
> que nos ocupemos de los asuntos de políticas en desarrollo en ICANN en
> paralelo a los procesos de designación de representantes que están en
> curso. El tema de regiones geográficas ha atraído interés en LACRALO
> anteriormente y este informe podría seguirlo despertando.
>
> Observo que el informe del grupo de trabajo de Regiones Geográficas
> concluye que no es posible hacer un nuevo esquema de regiones para ICANN,
> ni llevar a cabo modificaciones mayores sobre el actual.
>
> Esto implica para LACRALO que tendríamos que dejar de considerar la opción
> de una reestructuración a corto plazo de la composición de países que se
> reconocen en la región, y trabajar en favor de una mejora importante en la
> comunicación y cooperación entre las subregiones de Latinoamérica y el
> Caribe.
>
> El informe también sugiere la creación de un mecanismo por el cual los
> países puedan solicitar ser reasignados a una región diferente de la que
> actualmente los contiene. El informe sugiere que esta solicitud sea
> presentada por el gobierno de ese país y no deja claro cómo se considerarán
> las opiniones de las comunidades técnica, no comercial y de industria de
> ese mismo país, ni las de otros potencialmente afectados.
>
> Considero que este punto puede ameritar una discusión más detallada en
> LACRALO. Pido a Carlton Samuels que amplíe la información al respecto, ya
> que él formó parte del grupo de trabajo hasta esta conclusión, y, si hay
> interés, una discusión más organizada con un proceso que lleve a emitir una
> opinión de consenso por parte de LACRALO. Ésta, por supuesto, no debería
> estar en contradicción con que cada organización miembro pueda expresar la
> suya de manera independiente si no coincidiera.
>
> Saludos cordiales.
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
>
>
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
> ________________________________________
> Desde: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [
> alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de At-Large
> Staff [staff at atlarge.icann.org]
> Enviado el: domingo, 23 de junio de 2013 14:59
> Hasta: ALAC Announce
> Asunto: [ALAC-Announce] Community-wide Working Group Completes
> Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13-en.htm
> <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13-en.htm>
> Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of
> ICANN Geographic Regions Framework
> 22 June 2013
> The Geographic Regions Review Working Group, a community-wide working group
> established by the Board, has nearly completed its work developing
> recommendations to the ICANN Board for the continued use of the ICANN
> Geographic Regions Framework. The Working Group has produced those
> recommendations in a Final Report document that is being shared today with
> the community.
>
> According to the Working Group Charter, each community Supporting
> Organization and Advisory Committee that contributed members to the Working
> Group will now have the opportunity to formally review and comment on this
> document before it is submitted to the ICANN Board. The Working Group will
> host a workshop during the upcoming ICANN Public Meeting in Durban, South
> Africa and briefings will be made available to the leadership of all
> Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees (SOs and ACs) as needed.
>
> The Working Group was formed by the Board to (1) identify the different
> purposes for which ICANN's Geographic Regions are used; (2) determine
> whether the uses of ICANN's Geographic Regions (as currently defined, or at
> all) continue to meet the requirements of the relevant stakeholders; and
> (3)
> submit proposals for community and Board consideration relating to the
> current and future uses and definition of the ICANN Geographic Regions. A
> full record of the Working Group's past reports and public workshops and
> presentations can be found at the Working Group's Confluence Wiki space
> <
> https://community.icann.org/display/georegionwg/Geographic+Regions+Review+W
> G+-+Documents> .
>
> The Final Report will soon be formally shared directly with the leadership
> of the SOs and ACs participating in the Working Group. They will have a
> full
> 90 days after the conclusion of the Durban meeting to discuss the Working
> Group's recommendations with their communities and, if they choose, to
> submit written statements back to the Working Group. Later this year, after
> that exchange has taken place, the Working Group will formally submit its
> Final Report recommendations to the ICANN Board for consideration.
>
> A copy of the Final Report can be found here:
> * English
> <
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/geo-regions-final-report-22jun1
> 3-en.pdf>  [PDF, 287 KB]
> ICANN Staff Contact  Robert Hoggarth
>
> -------------------------
>
>
> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen
> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> One World, One Internet
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>

 * Fatima Cambronero * 
 Attorney-Argentina 

 Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 
 Twitter: @ facambronero 
 Skype: fatima.cambronero 

 * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 

 * Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions: * 
 http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ 

 * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/ 
 _______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/593a73285c.html
--]]