[lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? RES = 3A__Ultima_reuni = F3n_LACRAL? == Windows-1252? Q 'O' =
wilmer.azurza at gmail.com
wilmer.azurza at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 12:39:08 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? RES = 3A__Ultima_reuni = F3n_LACRAL? == Windows-1252? Q 'O' =
From: wilmer.azurza at gmail.com
The custom is a source of law on the right
International and of course in the United Nations.
And because not a rule, do not understand why continue to maintain as usual?
-
Wilmer Azurza
Of.: +51-1-6157800 Ext: 1815
Cell: +51-940145850
Sent from my BlackBerry.
----- Original Message -----
From: <sylvia at internautabrasil.org>
Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Date: Wed, June 20, 2013 9:14:10
To: 'Alberto Soto' <alberto at soto.net.ar> ; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Cc: 'At-Large Staff' <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
Subject: [lac-discuss-es] RES: Last reunin LACRALO
Dear Alberto:
My arguments in this regard are:
1. - We have what ICANN's bylaws have in this area:
ICANN's Nominating Committee asked the At-Large Advisory Committee to submit
a list with ALAC Delegates from each of ICANN's five geographic regions.
Voting members of the NomCom are appointed for a one year term, starting
after the close of the Annual General Meeting 2013 and ending at the close
of the Annual General Meeting 2014, and May be re-appointed for a Further
term of one year subject to the requirement under the ICANN Bylaws.
XI-2.4.e The ALAC Marshall, after Consultation with each THIN, Annually
appoint five voting Delegates (two of Whom Shall not be Citizens of countries
in the same Geographic Region, as defined According To Section 5 of Article
VI to the Nominating Committee.
So, ALAC requires each THIN consult, although the decision is not
binding!
Two. - Traditionally made a ballot in our THIN respect
NOMCOM under.
This is a custom of our THIN!And as you well sabs,
the usual source of law is on the right
International and of course in the United Nations.
And do not forget that our rules are based on the rules of
UN procedure.
Therefore, although no specific estexpresamente, custom if
is right in this case.
Three. - And also, as the conference discuss the changes
proposed a few days ago and in the conference are welcome but
The nearest be considered in elections!
Greetings all,
Sylvia
___________________________________________________
Sylvia Herlein
sylvia at internautabrasil.org
Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2014 - http://atlarge.icann.org
Secretary FLUI 2009-2013
sylvia_leite = Skype
----- Mensagem Original -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Alberto
Thicket
Posted in: Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:18
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Cc: 'At-Large Staff'
Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Last reunin LACRALO
Dear, in the last reunin is tratel subject of a ballot in LACRALO
for current charges by Ruling defined in ALAC.
I preguntcules were current regulations procedures or
made possible such ballot. Also mencionque if hacamos one ballot,
the same shall not be binding, ie, that made no sense to do so because
tena no bearing on who should define the election.
In the same reunin, there were many voices calling transparency
procedures to which adhere absolutely.
Encontrninguna Continubuscando and regulations to support such ballot.
Under the points made in this reuniny to not having had a
satisfactory answer, ask the President and secrete sir, that
report applies the rules to allow such a ballot.
Best Regards
Alberto Soto
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/389f7c22d4.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list