[lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? RES = 3A__Ultima_reuni = F3n_LACRAL? == Windows-1252? Q 'O' =

wilmer.azurza at gmail.com wilmer.azurza at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 12:39:08 UTC 2013


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? RES = 3A__Ultima_reuni = F3n_LACRAL? == Windows-1252? Q 'O' = 
 From: wilmer.azurza at gmail.com

 The custom is a source of law on the right 
 International and of course in the United Nations. 
 And because not a rule, do not understand why continue to maintain as usual? 
 - 
 Wilmer Azurza 
 Of.: +51-1-6157800 Ext: 1815 
 Cell: +51-940145850 


 Sent from my BlackBerry. 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: <sylvia at internautabrasil.org>
 Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Date: Wed, June 20, 2013 9:14:10 
 To: 'Alberto Soto' <alberto at soto.net.ar> ; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Cc: 'At-Large Staff' <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
 Subject: [lac-discuss-es] RES: Last reunin LACRALO 


 Dear Alberto: 
 My arguments in this regard are:


 1. - We have what ICANN's bylaws have in this area: 
 ICANN's Nominating Committee asked the At-Large Advisory Committee to submit 
 a list with ALAC Delegates from each of ICANN's five geographic regions. 
 Voting members of the NomCom are appointed for a one year term, starting 
 after the close of the Annual General Meeting 2013 and ending at the close 
 of the Annual General Meeting 2014, and May be re-appointed for a Further 
 term of one year subject to the requirement under the ICANN Bylaws. 
 XI-2.4.e The ALAC Marshall, after Consultation with each THIN, Annually 
 appoint five voting Delegates (two of Whom Shall not be Citizens of countries 
 in the same Geographic Region, as defined According To Section 5 of Article 
 VI to the Nominating Committee. 


 So, ALAC requires each THIN consult, although the decision is not 
 binding! 


 Two. - Traditionally made a ballot in our THIN respect 
 NOMCOM under. 
 This is a custom of our THIN!And as you well sabs, 
 the usual source of law is on the right 
 International and of course in the United Nations. 
 And do not forget that our rules are based on the rules of 
 UN procedure. 
 Therefore, although no specific estexpresamente, custom if 
 is right in this case. 


 Three. - And also, as the conference discuss the changes 
 proposed a few days ago and in the conference are welcome but 
 The nearest be considered in elections! 
 Greetings all, 
 Sylvia 


 ___________________________________________________ 
 Sylvia Herlein 
 sylvia at internautabrasil.org 
 Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2014 - http://atlarge.icann.org 
 Secretary FLUI 2009-2013 
 sylvia_leite = Skype 




 ----- Mensagem Original ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Alberto 
 Thicket 
 Posted in: Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:18 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Cc: 'At-Large Staff' 
 Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Last reunin LACRALO 


 Dear, in the last reunin is tratel subject of a ballot in LACRALO 
 for current charges by Ruling defined in ALAC. 
 I preguntcules were current regulations procedures or 
 made possible such ballot. Also mencionque if hacamos one ballot, 
 the same shall not be binding, ie, that made no sense to do so because 
 tena no bearing on who should define the election. 
 In the same reunin, there were many voices calling transparency 
 procedures to which adhere absolutely. 
 Encontrninguna Continubuscando and regulations to support such ballot.
 Under the points made in this reuniny to not having had a 
 satisfactory answer, ask the President and secrete sir, that 
 report applies the rules to allow such a ballot. 
 Best Regards 


 Alberto Soto 




 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/389f7c22d4.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list