[lac-discuss-en] The right to forget

[aidanoblia at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: The right to forget 
 From: aidanoblia at gmail.com

 Dear: 


 From what I have learned so far, modestly, the issue is 
 great practical importance today, an when it is difficult to power 
 "Erase" all traces of Internet information that at some point between 
 in the network. 
 Whereupon exercise the right to be forgotten is of difficult application 
 if the information is volcen network. 




 The right to be forgotten can exercise the owner of the data (facts, 
 etc.) that are broadcast on the network, is part of the right to the protection of 
 personal data is governed by certain principles, including that of 
 purpose of the data, informed consent, proportionality, 
 FITNESS. 


 The casustica is extensive.


 Deleting data from the database may be even harmful 
 to the holder of the data, an in case of sensitive data. 
 If it comes to health data (sensitive data) or schooling or 
 grades in a university, the person that can turn Confa 
 the respective Centre for a certificacinan many years 
 after. 


 In this case the injured will be the holder of the data, who is 
 which also has the right to be forgotten and may not be the case 
 interest in exercise, quite the opposite. 


 The European project an terminde not read, contains limits hope 
 in deletion of the data according to the different purposes. 


 Focusing on the scope of ICANN, the topic will discuss in particular 
 respect to the information contained in the Domain Name Registration, which 
 are determined, appropriate to the purpose of the registry and MUST 
 remain in the registry as the name and then estregistrado 
 eliminated.The applicant shall be the holder of the right to be in the 
 Register and be retired prior relevant trmite. 




 The problem that I understand was considering these registry data is 
 the appropriate limits of Legislation Of its data protection 
 divulgacin, being that is open to the public registry. 


 From what I have seen, the public records provide information 
 various data of people and that is their function, for example in 
 cases of the Registry of Deeds or Automotive, of Attachments. 


 These records also report having data freely, 
 who request it. The purpose for which the information is used and 
 not a registry issue. The function of the Registry is to provide these data. 


 No sensitive data is involved, which are specially protected according 
 The legislation on data protection, but sson personal data. 


 The control prevencino misuse of the data is the subject of another control 
 different.


 There is a delicate balance between the right of access to information and the 
 right to personal data protection and oblivion. It is complex 
 generally solve because casustica is increasingly wide by 
 complex world. I understand it is more acute in the current stage of the process, 
 an unconsolidated and paradigms in formation, so that is not 
 may have the temporal stability of the above .. 






 Regards 










 - 
 Aida Noblia 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5969f89a8a.html
--]]