[lac-discuss-en] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS

[josefranciscoarce at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS 
 From: josefranciscoarce at gmail.com

 Dear Vanda: 


 I want to let you know that as well decs, are part of the structure 
 ICANN, but ICANN are bound only by the MoU (and this was said to be 
 clarifier of what I will say more later). 


 The query that you refer to ICANN's lawyers already made (in 
 opportunity like this) and the response was sent to the region in 
 varied opportunities. And that answer is vlida these purposes also. 
 Answer it back down to copy ms. 


 Where is estviolando ICANN Bylaws or the MoU, as well 
 you say, that with more knowledge sabrque do in these cases. 


 Asmismo Vanda, I personally ask you to answer two 
 questions: 


 Because tcrees never before made this questioning process 
 election of the region? and why now?


 For qutu think the ICANN staff shall not take intervencin in 
 elections? 


 These responses favorecern in the understanding of the situation. Thanks 


 Best Regards 


 JosArce. - 






 DEPARTMENT RESPONSE TO LEGAL CONSULTATION PROCESS ICANN 
 ESTAUTOS OUR EVENTS IN LAST GENERAL ASSEMBLY 


 Kindly note the Following: Because the LACRALO is a separate entity from 
 ICANN, we are not in a position to Provide legal advice Regarding binding 
 the internal operations of the LACRALO, UNLESS there are actions Undertaken 
 That result in a violation of ICANN Bylaws or of the MoU. 


 * SPANISH: * 


 Because LACRALO is a legal entity separate from ICANN, we are not in the 
 position to provide binding legal advice about the internal operations 
 LACRALO, unless such actions result in a Violation of 
 ICANN Bylaws or the MOU. 




















 The March 10, 2013 12:01, Vanda UOL <vanda at uol.com.br> wrote: 


> En estos casos Yo creo que es prudente consultarnos los abogados de Icann
> porque nosotros somos partes de la estructura de Icann ( icann paga
> nuestros costos) para evitar problemas como ya tuvimos de sobra An LACRALO.
> Creo que Dr. Alejandro tiene conocimiento para hacerlo, así lo pediría que
> hiciese esta consulta antes de finalizar esto proceso.
> Abrazos
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 08/03/2013, at 20:15, Johnny Laureano <johnnylaureano at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Estimados compañeros de LACRALO, Staff ICANN,
> >
> > Es dificil pasar por alto los comentarios respecto de la legitimidad de
> este proceso eleccionario, me recuerda que se ha experimentado antes y lo
> doloroso que son estos procesos para todos.
> >
> > Es por ello, de ser posible, sea oportuno aperturar por una semana el
> registro de candidatos para este proceso eleccionario y conformar un comité
> electoral, tal lo planteado por el Dr. Pisanty, me parece sensato y
> razonable.
> >
> > Una apertura a estas dos acciones, coadyuvará a la legitimidad de los
> resultados.
> >
> >
> > Johnny Laureano
> > AUI PERU - ALS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Fri, 3/8/13, Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECCIONES
> > To: "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" <apisan at unam.mx>
> > Cc: "lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <
> staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> > Date: Friday, March 8, 2013, 4:58 PM
> >
> >
> > Dr. Pisanty:
> >
> > Quizás me exprese mal y dije algo que no quise decir, aunque no creo
> > haberlo hecho, en ningún momento defendí a José, ni defendí nada, lo
> único
> > que expresé  y que reitero, es mi molestia personal por los términos
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/da8383567b.html
--]]