[lac-discuss-en] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS

silvia.vivanco at icann.org silvia.vivanco at icann.org
Mon Mar 11 03:27:07 UTC 2013


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS 
 From: silvia.vivanco at icann.org

 Dear Vanda, et all, 


 I would like to ask if there is any concrete and specific circumstance LACRALO Which Merits That the election process be called into question. As I Explained Earlier in my email, ICANN Staff has been updating the WIKI, monitoring and BOTH Mailists LACRALO Working with the Secretariat and Chair, to Ensure the process is transparent, fair and That All members of LACRALO had a chance to send nominations, support candidates, etc. 


 The election process is taking place According To LACRALO's CURRENT ROPs (However good or bad), this is what you LACRALO at the moment, and this is the procedure That is being Followed. 


 ICANN staff at your disposal so Remains That this election process can move forward. 


 Thank you! 




 Kind regards, 


 Silvia


 Silvia Vivanco 
 Manager, At-Large Regional Affairs 
 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
 Telephone: + 1 (202) 570-7119 
 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 
 Cell / Mobile: +1 (202) 735-7011 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of vanda at uol.com.br 
 Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:02 a.m. 
 To: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-in] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS 




 [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]] 


 Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS 
 From: vanda at uol.com.br 


 In These cases I think it is prudent to consult lawyers Icann Because We Are Part of the structure of ICANN (ICANN pay our costs) to avoid problems as we had plenty of An LACRALO. I think Dr. Alexander has knowledge to do so, aslo ask you did this before the end of this consultation process. 
 Hugs 




 Vanda Scartezini 
 Sent from my iPhone 




 On 03.08.2013, at 20:15, Johnny Laureano <johnnylaureano at yahoo.com> wrote: 




> Estimados compañeros de LACRALO, Staff ICANN,
>  
> Es dificil pasar por alto los comentarios respecto de la legitimidad de este proceso eleccionario, me recuerda que se ha experimentado antes y lo doloroso que son estos procesos para todos. 
>  
> Es por ello, de ser posible, sea oportuno aperturar por una semana el registro de candidatos para este proceso eleccionario y conformar un comité electoral, tal lo planteado por el Dr. Pisanty, me parece sensato y razonable.
>  
> Una apertura a estas dos acciones, coadyuvará a la legitimidad de los resultados.
>  
>  
> Johnny Laureano
> AUI PERU - ALS
>  
>  
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 3/8/13, Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECCIONES
> To: "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" <apisan at unam.mx>
> Cc: "lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013, 4:58 PM
> 
> 
> Dr. Pisanty:
> 
> Quizás me exprese mal y dije algo que no quise decir, aunque no creo
> haberlo hecho, en ningún momento defendí a José, ni defendí nada, lo único
> que expresé  y que reitero, es mi molestia personal por los términos













[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3b77575767.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list