[lac-discuss-en] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS

Mon Mar 11 00:55:01 UTC 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS 
 From: alberto at soto.net.ar

 Alexander, I read and reread ms the link you sent, I see In no 
 side anyone should depart from its function in order to be reelected. I 
 Interested JosArce it fails to reply or answer. 
 If I want to observe the procedures, and that is not esthaciendo 
 in any of your orders. First was that it was not transparent, and According the 
 link you sent: 

 &quot;Note: Regulation of LACRALO, Sern nominations accepted for 
 PERIOD minimum of four weeks from the date of the call for 
 nominations, with eleccina performed no sooner than 48 hours after the 
 the expiracin 8 weeks from the date of the call for 
 nominations. (Rules 13.1, 13.2, 13.3). &quot; 

 With this it is clear that the process is transparent.

 After this was answered, that the choice was afirmabas operated 
 by Staff, and claim one rendicin account, which according to the link ism 
 you sent: 

 &quot;The 90-minute teleconference organizaruna Duracin to Questions 
 and Exhibition candidates / as to both charges during the week of 8 to 15 
 March 2013. In case it is necessary, the second realizaruna 
 teleconference in the week from 16 to 23 March 2013. As is 
 always, we encourage you to submit questions for ALS candidates for 
 written to be announced once the date of the meeting, but 
 estarpermitido also make them for the same. &quot; 

 Thus, any previously podrrequerir any candidate who 
 answer questions that you do the same. I think it's your 
 opportunity, following normal procedures, without offending anyone, and 
 Best of all, ajustndose to right.
 I will not accept that violate established procedures and 
 force, and that every answer you can think of someone calling out 
 something new and out of the proceedings. 

 And I await an answer from staff Vanda, I think 
 unavoidable for office. 

 I am so tired of grievances in LACRALO free, and I do not 
 permitindolos we should follow. 

 Alberto Soto 

 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Dr. 
 Alejandro Pisanty Baruch 
 Posted on: Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:18 pm 
 To: Alberto Soto, 'Vanda UOL'; 'Johnny Laureano' 
 CC: 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS 

 Alberto, 

 in  https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40928090 
 apparent latitude with the President and Secretary of LACRALO for 
 request that they be independent parties who organize the debates and 
 teleconferences, and opportunity - and wasted - to isolate the 
 conduction of the choice. 

 A few hours left to submit reports to assess their 
 Gestin. 

 Again, in the case of Sylvia's rendicin estfacilitada accounts because 
 she participates in an election competitive. In the case of the President, 
 have received a single message from you that explcitamente passes the 
 above opportunities. 

 We then face an attempted reeleccin driven by the same 
 person presents reeleccin - besides techniques activities 
 to correctly attribute to &quot;staff&quot; - which manifests 
 no or too sparse a will democrtica. 

 The legitimacy dficit tendrconsecuencias undoubtedly. 

 Up here, with exceptions, which I think are worth discussing because the 
 silence of the Presidency. 

 Alejandro Pisanty

 --------------------------- 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 

 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 

 SMS FROM +525541444475 +525541444475 Mexico 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, 
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

 ________________________________________ 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto 
 [Alberto at soto.net.ar] Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 16:44 
 To: 'Vanda UOL'; 'Johnny Laureano' 
 CC: 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS

 If AS, suggest that consultations be made before insulting and 
 LACRALO offend wing President and Staff. 
 Vanda, I ExtrAA that occupying a position like that you occupy in NONCOM, 
 guarantees some who are against all proceedings. 
 I ask you please answer me that you support your request rules 
 query. 
 Thank you very much 

 Alberto Soto 

 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Vanda 
 UOL Posted on: Sunday, March 10, 2013 24:01 
 To: Johnny Laureano 
 CC: ICANN At-Large Staff; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS 

 In these cases I think it is prudent to consult lawyers Icann 
 because we are part of the structure of ICANN (ICANN pay our 
 costs) to avoid problems as we had plenty of An LACRALO. I feel that 
 Dr. Alexander has knowledge to do so, aslo ask you did 
 this consultation process before finalizing it. 
 Hugs

 Vanda Scartezini 
 Sent from my iPhone 

 On 03.08.2013, at 20:15, Johnny Laureano <johnnylaureano at yahoo.com> wrote: 

> Estimados compañeros de LACRALO, Staff ICANN,
>
> Es dificil pasar por alto los comentarios respecto de la legitimidad 
> de
 these processes are painful for everyone. 
 > 
> Es por ello, de ser posible, sea oportuno aperturar por una semana el
 election, such as proposed by Dr. Pisanty, it seems sensible and 
 reasonable. 
 > 
> Una apertura a estas dos acciones, coadyuvará a la legitimidad de los
 > 
 > 
> Johnny Laureano
> AUI PERU - ALS
>
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 3/8/13, Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora at gmail.com>
 > 
 > 
> From: Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECCIONES
> To: "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" <apisan at unam.mx>
> Cc: "lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org"
> <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "ICANN At-Large Staff"
> <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013, 4:58 PM
>
>
> Dr. Pisanty:
>
> Quizás me exprese mal y dije algo que no quise decir, aunque no creo 
> haberlo hecho, en ningún momento defendí a José, ni defendí nada, lo 
> único que expresé  y que reitero, es mi molestia personal por los 
> términos

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ed14c3bc76.html
--]]