[lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? ICANN_News_Alert_-_Pol = EDtica_vs_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Implementaci = F3n? =

[fatimacambronero at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? ICANN_News_Alert_-_Pol = EDtica_vs_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Implementaci = F3n? = 
 From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com

 Carlton, all 




 Thanks Carlton for sealarnos this subject, on which I consider 
 deberamos work and speak out as RALO. 




 I think this draft is important firstly because it arises 
 because of the discussions that were generated from the implementacin 
 new gTLDs program. Already Ledo and even some part of 
 all discussions around this topic. 




 Since this matter is tried to distinguish the one hand, between 
 those items requiring Policies, and on the other, those who 
 implementacin work required. 




 As this draft Seala within ICANN are different kinds of 
 POLICIES:


 the formal POLICIES are made travs Process 
 Developments POLICIES (PDP); 


 the non-operational POLICIES are subject to a PDP or 
 Implementations are considered, 


 and estn the general practices, call or pequeas POLICIES 
 procedures. 


 While this draft is based on experience within the space of 
 gTLDs, this framework also has parts or sections that can be useful and 
 applicable to other areas. At this point I consider important to analyze qu 
 parts can be useful for our RALO. 




 A travs of this work subject to review public, attempting 
 identify the appropriate processes to follow when it comes to changes 
 POLICIES recommendations have already been adopted by the Board of 
 ICANN, or when it comes to proposals related to implementacin of 
 POLICIES recommendations already approved. 




 Another issue is when the Resolution estrelacionado a new problem 
 must be supported by a consensus of the ICANN community, and when a 
 matter arising from the APPLICATION of a policy can be done by 
 the Board or the staff even if there is no consensus within the community 
 ICANN. 




 Have also proposed a set of principles and questions to guide 
 discussions on this topic can be found in the link 
 compartiCarlton us. 




 This comment audience will be open until 21 February and I 
 seems important to analyze this draft and whether or not it is appropriate 
 we issue one view favored since LACRALO. 




 Quopinan you? 




 Best regards, 


 Fatima 




 On February 1, 2013 18:12 <carlton.samuels at gmail.com> wrote: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>
>  Asunto: Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Política vs Implementación
>  De: carlton.samuels at gmail.com
>
>  **
>  [Imagen: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> Alerta de noticias
>
>
>  http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-31jan13-en.htm
>  ------------------------------
>  Política vs Implementación
>
>
>  31 de enero 2013
>
>
>
>
>   * Anuncio de Foro: Período Comentario * Abre en * Fecha: * 31 de enero
> 2013 *
>  Categorías / Etiquetas: * Procesos * Política de Propósito (Breve): * Con
> el fin de
>  fomentar la información sobre la política de personal de ICANN Papel vs
> Implementación
>  Proyecto de marco para
>  Discusión <
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/policy-implementation-framework-08jan13-en.pdf>
> [PDF,
>  195 KB], un foro de comentarios públicos ha sido abierto. El recibió
>  comentarios se espera que introduce en la sesión que se está planificando
> en
>  este tema en la reunión de ICANN en Beijing.* Enlace Comentario Público
> caja: *
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/policy-implementation-31jan13-en.htm
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/56797fec57.html
--]]