[lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? VIEW = F3n_solicitados_a_la_comuni? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Dad_At-Large_en_los_comentarios_recibidos_sobre_la_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Objeci F3n_de_solicitudes_de_gTLD_nuevos = 2E =? =

[aidanoblia at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? VIEW = F3n_solicitados_a_la_comuni? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Dad_At-Large_en_los_comentarios_recibidos_sobre_la_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Objeci F3n_de_solicitudes_de_gTLD_nuevos = 2E =? = 
 From: aidanoblia at gmail.com

 Dear William and colisteros: 




 I appreciate the testimony of William and understand that this is an issue of 
 vital importance. In full accordance with the claims against these 
 proposed as new proposed gTLD names on 
 designated regions and represent autochthonous content. Not only the name of 
 passes is significant for determining precise territorial limits, 
 large areas like Amazon or Patagonia have content that is more 
 allde refer to these limits and lifestyles, natural resources, 
 heritage of a nation. 


 Greetings to all 


 - 
 Aida Noblia 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a7a4c91ba9.html
--]]