[lac-discuss-en] FW: Opinions Requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.
apisan at unam.mx
apisan at unam.mx
Sat Jan 26 16:42:12 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: FW: Opinions Requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.
From: apisan at unam.mx
Colleagues,
"Now is when. Amazon and. Patagonia ms need your help," says aquDev so very timely.
Alejandro Pisanty
---------------------------
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS FROM +525541444475 +525541444475 Mexico
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
________________________________________
From: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh [devtee at gmail.com]
Posted on: sbado, January 26, 2013 8:15
To: afri-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org; LACRALO discussion list, na-discuss @ AtLarge-lists. icann.org, At-Large Worldwide
Subject: [At-Large] Opinions Requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.
As per the process by Which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD
application (see PDF at
http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD)
the New gTLD Review Group (RG gTLD) kindly requests from the Opinions
the At-Large community on the comments received on the Following new
gTLD applications:
. Amazon ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.amazon_OG
. Patagonia ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.patagonia_OG
. Nyc ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.nyc_OG
. Health ( https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG
To date, there are not enough comments by the At-Large community on
These applications to determine Whether there is substantial businesses
opposition as described in section 3.5.4 of the Applicant Guidebook.
This section describe four tests for the Dispute Resolution Service
Provider hearing the objection to determine Whether there is
Substantial opposition from a significant portion of the community to
Which may be targeted the string. For an objection to be successful,
the objector must Prove that:
* The community invoked by the objector is a Clearly delineated community, and
* Community opposition to the application is substantial businesses, and
* There is a strong association Invoked Between the community and the
applied-for gTLD string, and
* The application Creates a likelihood of material detriment to the
rights or legitimate Interests of a significant portion
Which of the community to the string may be Explicitly or implicitly targeted.
See https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg
grounds for objection criteria.
You can post your opinions on the wiki pages linked to by or Earlier
Visiting the new gTLD Dashboard at http://bit.ly/newgtld
gTLDs before the next conference call on February RG January 2013
Kind Regards,
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
RG gTLD chair
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c2a86c4104.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list