[lac-discuss-en] FW: Opinions Requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.

apisan at unam.mx apisan at unam.mx
Sat Jan 26 16:42:12 UTC 2013


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: FW: Opinions Requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications. 
 From: apisan at unam.mx

 Colleagues, 


 "Now is when. Amazon and. Patagonia ms need your help," says aquDev so very timely. 


 Alejandro Pisanty 




 --------------------------- 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 






 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 


 SMS FROM +525541444475 +525541444475 Mexico 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 


 ________________________________________ 
 From: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh [devtee at gmail.com] 
 Posted on: sbado, January 26, 2013 8:15 
 To: afri-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org; LACRALO discussion list, na-discuss @ AtLarge-lists. icann.org, At-Large Worldwide 
 Subject: [At-Large] Opinions Requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications. 


 As per the process by Which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD 
 application (see PDF at 
 http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD) 
 the New gTLD Review Group (RG gTLD) kindly requests from the Opinions 
 the At-Large community on the comments received on the Following new 
 gTLD applications: 


 . Amazon (  https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.amazon_OG 
 . Patagonia (  https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.patagonia_OG 
 . Nyc (  https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.nyc_OG 
 . Health (  https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.health_OG 


 To date, there are not enough comments by the At-Large community on 
 These applications to determine Whether there is substantial businesses 
 opposition as described in section 3.5.4 of the Applicant Guidebook. 
 This section describe four tests for the Dispute Resolution Service 
 Provider hearing the objection to determine Whether there is 
 Substantial opposition from a significant portion of the community to 
 Which may be targeted the string. For an objection to be successful, 
 the objector must Prove that: 


 * The community invoked by the objector is a Clearly delineated community, and 
 * Community opposition to the application is substantial businesses, and 
 * There is a strong association Invoked Between the community and the 
 applied-for gTLD string, and 
 * The application Creates a likelihood of material detriment to the 
 rights or legitimate Interests of a significant portion 
 Which of the community to the string may be Explicitly or implicitly targeted. 


 See  https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg 
 grounds for objection criteria.
 You can post your opinions on the wiki pages linked to by or Earlier 
 Visiting the new gTLD Dashboard at http://bit.ly/newgtld 
 gTLDs before the next conference call on February RG January 2013 




 Kind Regards, 


 Dev Anand Teelucksingh 
 RG gTLD chair 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c2a86c4104.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list