[lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? RES = 3A__ICANN_est = C3 = A1_considerando_c? == Utf-8? Q? Ambiar_su_Estrategia_de_Consolidaci = C3 = B3n_de_Reuniones_? == Utf-8? Q? De_la_ICANN? =

vanda at uol.com.br vanda at uol.com.br
Tue Oct 30 18:22:52 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: =? Utf-8? Q? RES = 3A__ICANN_est = C3 = A1_considerando_c? == Utf-8? Q? Ambiar_su_Estrategia_de_Consolidaci = C3 = B3n_de_Reuniones_? == Utf-8? Q? De_la_ICANN? = 
 From: vanda at uol.com.br

 ICANN's proposal is that the two are still Europe and Asia Pacific. The rotation will be between North America, Latin America and Africa. 
 It is important that Europe is fixed because it is the most central region and less visa requirements, which this year was such a disaster in Canada. 
 Latin America: So far there is an offer by the end of 2013 in Latin America, which means that it is becoming difficult as temos rotation now. It was Chile, Uruguay, Brazil twice, Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica; 
 North America is terrible on visa issues and there is only USA and CANADA, better do as little as possible. African countries were already possible, others not offer suitable conditions, even on flights.
 Asia Pacific - here is a huge number of countries with hotel and flight conditions rather comfortable for being so long this region there are many countries that make proposals and fail because there are few opportunities. 
 I think the proposal is sensible ICANN 
 Vanda 
 ----- Mensagem Original ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Juan Manuel Rojas 
 Submitted in: second-feira, 29 outubro 2012 20:04 
 To: LACRALO Spanish 
 Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] ICANN is considering changing its strategy of consolidating the ICANN Meetings 


 Thanks Natalia for this initiative! 
 In this regard I must say it is important that we make a document as a region, in this I agree with Natalia. 




 I made some comments on the site Natalia shared, copied it here if that will help us to discuss about it, also can be found on the site that ICANN had before it: 
 The theme 
 discuss consolidated Strategy Meetings ICANN meetings and participatory processes that take place permanently. 


 I 
 agreement on permanent rotation places for conducting the General Assembly. Believe it important that only perform one of the annual meetings in North America to give more space to other lu 


 I 
 suggest the following 


 -Making 
 the first meeting in two cities in Asia-Pacific Performing the second meeting of the year in a city in North America and the other in one of Europe Perform the third meeting on a rotating basis in cities of Africa (2014), and Latin America (2015) 


 I feel that 
 regional rotation is important and essential to achieve regional diversity that is intended from ICANN and can ensure representatitividad of the different actors involved.


 JUAN MANUEL ROJAS 
 Social Communicator 
 President - AGEIA DENSI Colombia 


 Twitter: @ JmanuRojas 


 Join LACRALO: 
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 




















 ________________________________ 
 From: Natalia Enciso <natalia.enciso at gmail.com>
 To: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Posted: Monday, October 29, 2012 4:45 PM 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-es] ICANN is considering changing its strategy of consolidating the ICANN Meetings 


 Good afternoon to all! 


 We are back in Toronto, when I can and I reorganize the office 
 I send my report of the meetings. 


 Meanwhile, I want to draw attention to the proposed 
 modification of the Proposal on the consolidation strategy 
 ICANN Meetings (* strategy meetings for public locations).
 * 
 Public comments can be found on this page 
 http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/meetings-proposal-2012-02oct12-en.htm 
 * (English) 
 * 
 http://www.icann.org/es/news/public-comment/meetings-proposal-2012-02oct12-es.htm 
 * (Spanish) 
 * 
 The dates are: 


 * Opening of Comment: * October 2, 2012 * Closing Comment: * 16 
 November 2012 * Closing Time (UTC): * Commentary Announcement 23:59 
 Public <http://www.icann.org/es/news/announcements/announcement-02oct12-es.htm>
 * Open Response: * November 17, 2012 Present your 
 Entries (Forum) <meetings-proposal-2012 at icann.org> * Closing the 
 Answer: * December 7, 2012 View Comments 
 submitted <http://forum.icann.org/lists/meetings-proposal-2012/>
 * Closing Time (UTC): * 23:59 Report brief review public comments 


 * Summary * 


 * PURPOSE: * It is essential that the headquarters of the meeting have 
 excellent facilities that encourage interaction. The purpose is 
 ensure the use of sites that offer the best facilities for 
 conferences.
 * 
 BACKGROUND: * Since 1999, ICANN identifies and selects sites 
 meetings through a process of proposals by 
 hosts. In 2007, the 
 ICANN implemented a new policy, whereby most of the 
 planning and implementation was under his charge, but keeping the 
 support of local host on 
 government involvement, the Internet bandwidth, the event 
 gala, security and other aspects of the meeting. 


 * DIFFICULTY: * A half that ICANN meetings were taking greater 
 alance and call, were markedly reduced the number of facilities 
 capable of carrying out an ICANN meeting. Furthermore, the 
 number of facilities that effectively meet all criteria 
 selection of venues for meetings is extremely limited. It is 
 becoming increasingly difficult to find new hosts and cities 
 appropriate facilities for the meeting venues.
 * 
 PROPOSAL: * ICANN identify the best facilities worldwide 
 to take after the ICANN Meeting. Generally, these 
 facilities convention centers are often complemented by 
 hotels nearby. Proposed consolidation of meetings for 2014, 2015 
 and 2016: 


 • Make the first meeting * year * in two cities in the region * 
 Asia-Pacific. * 
 • Perform * meeting * second year in two cities in Europe *. * 
 * Perform * third meeting of the year on a rotating basis in the following 
 regions: 
 North America (2014), 
 Africa (2015) and 
 * Latin America / Caribbean (2016). * 




 This proposal * can * have an impact on regional diversity. The 
 issues to consider are: 
 • * The equitable regional rotation, is it important or not? 
 • Is it enough to rotate in a &quot;not equal&quot;? 
 • What can be done to mitigate any negative impacts? * 




 As you can see, a * LAC will only touch a meeting every three years *! As 
 affects the participation and access of stakeholders in ICANN, not 
 be moved (either by themselves or by their caseworkers) to 
 regions more distant from our own, either because of cost, access, 
 distance, etc. 


 It is important that we express our opinion as a region, as we 
 directly affected by this proposal. 


 I welcome your comments, 


 Natalia Enciso. 




 - 
 natalia.enciso @ gmail.com 
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e0a4810f91.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list