[lac-discuss-en] Blocking a domain name UDRP object

apisan at unam.mx apisan at unam.mx
Mon Sep 3 05:31:46 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Blocking a domain name UDRP object 
 From: apisan at unam.mx

 Humberto, 


 Turning to inmovilizacin of domain names under UDRDP: 


 By qula reference to "civil law"? I understand that asse tells from space Anglo, but that you may be referring to the right ests prevailing in most of the region covered by LACRALO (and in the right space consuetidinario or "common law "due process is just as important). But I'm no lawyer. 


 Also I disagree with your interpretation regarding which may affect the due process. The inmovilizacin ms of speech which is the only impediment to transfer a domain name under dispute under the UDRP.One lawyer aquque not look very much like the numerous injunctions ordering judges and other authorities, eg inheritance and succession, and even individuals, to prevent people who are well or leave dispute unavailable. 


 Part of what esthaciendo the query in question is that if inmovilizacin becomes part of the rules, and did not violate due process but will be part of it. 


 As I am not a lawyer, before proposing some consultcon this criterion, and support it, even gave me some examples and additional critterios. 


 Could we see Asque think thoroughly whether or not the sufficient expertise and interest in our community need to move forward on this issue. My apreciacin now is that good Juan Manuel Rojas attempted to form a group estdando no result because no combination of interest, knowledge and willingness among members of LACRALO, including in this case who we attempt to represent in ALAC, where such issues are discussed with passion, knowledge and experience - and in English. 


 Alejandro Pisanty 


 ! !! !! 
 NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUMBER OF NEW phone 






 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 


 FROM +525541444475 Mexico 


 SMS +525541444475 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM, 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 


 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 


 ________________________________________ 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of hcarrascob at gmail.com [hcarrascob at gmail.com] 
 Posted on: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 17:06 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Locking a domain name UDRP object 


 [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]]


 Subject: Re: Blocking a domain name UDRP object 
 From: hcarrascob at gmail.com 


 Dear Juan Manuel, 




 By This information thank you very much. 




 The revisarpdetalladamente, see in to contribute to CAN. 




 However, I want to sealar That in continental law, the lock 
 may affect the User constitutional Garanta / _ * due to 
 Process * _ / in particular, no hay When A RESOLUTION court. Sin 
 But before stating the above if in doubt, I must study it in detail. 




 A hug 




 Of course, sin Haber 
 On 08/28/2012 22:38, Juan Manuel Rojas wrote: 
> Estimados todos:
> Necesitamos establecer el punto de vista de LACRALO y para ello es importante tener en cuenta los resultados de la encuesta que se aplicó desde el WG Locking Domain: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31174551 puesto que ahi encontramos los resultados de los registrars y los proveedores de UDRP. Pienso que nos sirve para establecer cómo  se aplica eso en nuestros países. En esto nos pueden colaborar aquellos que como Humberto han tenido experiencia en este punto y los demás que puedan aportar, como Jose Ovidio, Jose Luis Barzallo e incluso Erick Iriarte.
>
> En la lista del WG se ha discutido mucho sobre posibles conclusiones derivadas del estudio realizado con las encuestas, pero básicamente se está estudiando cómo y en qué momento se aplican los bloqueos de dominios. Creo que el punto a discutir es qué tan afectados o no se han visto los usuarios finales con establecimiento del "Bloqueo" y de las políticas de UDRP pues ese es el tema que se está discutiendo y que generará recomendaciones.
>
> Se ha creado un espacio en el Wiki para opinar al respecto: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=36208918
>
> He estado hablando con gente de la región también involucrada en el tema, como Gabriela Szlak, quien está trabajando desde el Business Constituency del GNSO y de ser posible podamos construir una declaración conjunta entre el BC y LACRALO. Recuerden que el tiempo es corto para participar.
>
>
> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS
> Comunicador Social
> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia
>
> Twitter: @JmanuRojas
>
> Unete a LACRALO:
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en













[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/43cb8e385e.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list