[lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Nominaci = F3n_LACRALO_renuncia_com? == Iso-8859-1? Q? O_representante_toALAC? =
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Fri Aug 24 02:39:32 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Nominaci = F3n_LACRALO_renuncia_com? == Iso-8859-1? Q? O_representante_toALAC? =
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Roosevelt, never in my life, I had two positions. Quizs in Translation is
very bad.
Regards
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of
rok at bango.org.bb
Posted on: Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:45 pm
To lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: LACRALO nominacin toALAC resignation as representative
[[- Translated text (in -> s) -]]
Subject: Re: LACRALO nominacin toALAC resignation as representative
From: rok at bango.org.bb
Alberto,
Ests dnde Exactly? You estde accordance with the two positions which
seems. If I'm reading correctly Fátima is clear that nominacin of
Humberto estdentro rules.In addition, if I'm reading correctly,
esttratando LACRALO estdiciendo that the majority of use of break
rules.
A member of this list recordhoy me that it was the same thing
some tried to do in the General Assembly in Costa Rica, the use of
majority of age to break the rules and have the elections in the
General Assembly. This was basically defeated by the Caribbean members,
although one minora.
These two scenarios establishes a pattern of behavior. I
I personally find it disturbing that this behavior is
prevail within LACRALO allows for one vote point object
circumventing the rules establecidas.Por course, if this vote denies nominacin
Humberto, the rules They will have to be re-written to reflect the
decisiny with all my might I insist that the rules are
amended.
No doubt that LACRALO or any RALO can make their rules more
ICANN strict rules.If we do not want to ningn representative
be outside the region for any length of time, then you can
say this and say that too. If Humberto spends 4 months a year in Chile
to complete their studies, I'm not sure which is equal to residence
outside the region. Asque there is nothing wrong with a vote for change. Without
But this effectively change the rules and more than that, change the
intent of the rules on this to the point that anyone who
have to travel outside the region often or spend months at a time out
of the region, can be challenged as a candidate. This is the reaction that
will be felt.
Trying to change the rule causes the rule fairly reasonable and I dare
say, unwanted and engorroso.Me wish to qualify his speech
of unjustified attacks and if you mean me, I would like
note that in my emails to see unwarranted attacks ...
but this mode of trying to sully characters to an illegal act
can prevail is to place.
Personally, I have said that the President is not only responsible for
paper. I said that in Costa Rica and I'll say again, if you check the
votes will receive the watch that I abstained because, for me, already
had demonstrated their incompetence in Costa Rica. I have no excuses for
say. It may be relevant in other areas, but not when it comes
to interpret and apply the rules. If the President can not get a
meeting agenda beyond 4 hours after which type of chair
is that? I guess I'm being disrespectful, but if telling the truth is
disrespectful, then always be disrespectful. I by
therefore plead guilty with an explanation that the tests
carry out what I've been saying is fair comment and I
can lead to cross that post ... but do not expect me to be
silent and not expect that I will not express its indignation at these
attempts to circumvent the rules.
South Korea
----- Original Message -----
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Posted on: Wednesday, 22 August 2012 23:39
A: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Waiver LACRALO nomination
representative toALAC
[[- Text translation (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: LACRALO nomination resignation as representative of ALAC
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
My first comment to Fátima: decisiny really surprises me is the
I deeply regret, because mritos DEV and theirs, tendramos
Eleccin Reida and excellent one. I think it's remarkable the first major
loss
The electoral act. I know and understand, ysque is unwavering.
For the rest of the list and the recipients: the loss previously
mentioned, we must add another loss, as serious as the first, which
says Fátima and the issue of his resignation: "violating the
specifically requests
one of our rules of LACRALO. '
You have unread consequences revision of standards, because of their
Reviews
read the post, and therefore not reviewed at only basndose
Direct attacks or irnicas.
And I would add something I think anyone commenting and ms
the list already: not discuss whether or residence jurdicamente
address the requirements of Article 8 is quite logical: the
esttodos a place where the DAS, and if not in the region, not
Tendrel close and direct contact with users of the Internet,
other things, and not necessary required for recycling existirel
adequately fulfill the role.
I urge you to reflect on what has been done.
Regards
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of
Fatima
Cambronero
Posted on: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:16 a.m.
A: LACRALO Espaol; Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, At-Large
Personal, Rodrigo de la Parra
Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Waiver candidacy as representative
LACRALO to ALAC
Dear members of LACRALO,
I am contacting you in view of recent events
occurred in our RALO to inform my decision.
As delegates SABRN ALS have received their credentials for
vote and make a decision as a region. We must decide whether the
cuestin candidate meets the requirements of Rule 8 of our
Operating principles, specifically requires the residence
main
in one of the countries of the region.
According view favored the list sent by discusin
As President and Legal LACRALO the arguments of many
presented in this post, in our Principles basndonos
operation
LACRALO in the ICANN Bylaws, the laws of the State of California (and
reinforced with additional shari'ah), my opinion is that the
Rules are clear in terms of both required residence of
countries of the region, and also with the media quse
residence concept, a concept separate and distinct from the concept of
direction.
I am convinced that the rules estn achieve. And MSAN when, with
jurdicos the number of arguments, the rules are clear.
Vote in this case implies that if we all agree (or most)
we will decide what specifically requests violate one of our rules
LACRALO.
Taking the analysis work and respect our rules and present
presentnuestro arguments LACRALO President, is a very
few were taken and many of the answers to that e
electronic
full of disrespect and unsubstantiated opinions without
jurdicos arguments, which is what should be discussed in this case.
I would fully understand this: I will always defend the right
to
region to govern and decide how the problems that affect us as
such.
I have worked and will continue to reach a consensus in our
region, since it is not possible to decide for most of us.That s,
while respecting the principles of operation, our Memorandum of
Understanding
ICANN and the ICANN Bylaws.
In the situation we are living in LACRALO, this is not the case.
Let's vote to decide to break the rules.
As you all know my background is a lawyer, and I made a promise:
respect and enforce the laws (rules, rules, regulations).
Therefore, to remain part of the election process, going
against my profession, my oath and my principles, is to go
against my essence.
As I have indicated those who were part of the redaccin
our operating principles, the residency requirement (for
eg
Nationality of representatives) is demanding our Principles
Operation RALO to avoid capture by a organizacino by
a group of organizations. Unfortunately, it has been.
A estcapturado RALO not work in a healthy harmony, is a RALO
where delegates from organizations offering work groups,
after his lecture and participate in decisions
Working Group, is a General Assembly RALO where official
promised to deliver his report to the AG, then delivered without
must be requested by anyone, is a RALO where
official
respect the duties and functions assigned consultndolo
Officials of the other above is a RALO where our
representatives discussed policies, we as members are
delivering, after treated as a region.
It is unfortunate that in our RALO, when you can not destroy
positions with arguments, are destroyed by the force of the faults of
respect private pressures unsubstantiated opinions.
Gentlemen, donkey work or get results. We are like a bucket
full of crabs for wanting to stick his head up ms, is
head trample each other and, finally, no one leaves the cell.
This is not the LACRALO that imagin.
For the reasons stated, mainly due to
estn this case violated express and clear rules that require our
LACRALO Operating Principles, * I decided to quit my candidacy
as representative LACRALO to ALAC. *
Also take the opportunity to inform and notify my
the silence and lack of activity in the next few das because I will
be
quirrgica intervencin order to stay off.
Best regards,
Fatima Cambronero
-
* Fatima Cambronero *
Fiscal Argentina
Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
Twitter: @ facambronero
Skype: fatima.cambronero
* Join the discussions LACRALO / ICANN: *
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
* Join the discussions of Diplo Internet Governance Community: *
http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/
* Join the Internet Society (ISOC): *
http://www.internetsociety.org/
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0718e6975e.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list