[lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to
jumaropi at yahoo.com
jumaropi at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 17 20:12:38 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to
From: jumaropi at yahoo.com
Alexander and Natalia,
Thank you very much for the clarifications. In fact, I've personally been working on that WG and discutimucho about the construction of the survey before launch.
Aqupodrn find the comments received so far: http://forum.icann.org/lists/udrp-locking/
Sincerely,
JUAN MANUEL ROJAS
Social Communicator
President-AGEIA DENSIColombia
Twitter: @ JmanuRojas
Join LACRALO:
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
________________________________
From: Natalia Enciso <natalia.enciso at gmail.com>
To: Dr.Baruch Alejandro Pisanty <apisan at unam.mx>
CC: Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi at yahoo.com> ; LACRALO Espaol <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Posted: Friday, August 17, 2012 24:35
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to
Thank you Alexander.
In Alac tratel not matter, so you send us the link where are the themes which consist of Policies that ESTN trying.
Do not pasel BALN. Only Quera know your scholars on the topic because you're one of the most knowledgeable in the areas of ICANN and GI and your opinin always important. In addition to the questions you do, and demonstrate that serve as guide for guiding the discussion going. It was nothing more to start a constructive debate and discussion topics can be not only political elections.
Regards,
Natalia
On August 17, 2012 14:27, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan at unam.mx> escribitbNL>
Natalia,
>
>
> Many thanks for lending me the BALN. Go back, adding value:
>
>
> 1.Cul was your position in inmovilizacin ALAC on domain names subject to UDRP?
>
>
> 2. The position of inmovilizacin LACRALO on domain names subject to UDRP may articulate studying two poles:
>
>
> A. the viewpoint of the user who registers a domain name without any abuse and is accused of abuse in a UDRP. This user has interest in the domain name and continue to solve, allowing services to the last day that the UDRP has concluded that it must yield.
>
>
> B. the user's viewpoint challenging a domain name registration that affects you negatively. This user will probably prefer to leave the domain name to resolve from the first moment that your complaint is received by the UDRP provider for processing.
>
>
> An axis perpendicular to these two is the users who are not registrants, but depend on the Resolution of the contested domain name. How they swing their interests, assuming that the registration is abusive or abusive to controvertirlo procedure?
>
>
> This will only be resolved by defining the interests, and we take issues like due process and presumption of innocence.
>
>
> ESTs according to this approach? It's different approach is estaplicando in ALAC? It is very likely to be much more advanced.
>
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
>
>
>! ! ! !!
> NEW PHONE NUMBER - NEW PHONE NUMBER
>
> FROM ABROAD +52-1-5541444475
> FROM +525541444475 MXICO
> SMS +525541444475
> Dr. Alexander Pisanty
> UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> ................
>
> ________________________________
>
>Desde: Natalia Enciso [natalia.enciso at gmail.com]
>Enviado el: viernes, 17 de agosto de 2012 10:35
>Hasta: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
>CC: Juan Manuel Rojas; LACRALO Español
>Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings
>
>
>Gracias Juan Manuel por el dato.
>
>Alejandro, te dejo el link de at-large policy development https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Policy+Development+Page Como verás ese tema esta para confirmarse (TBC).
>
>Para iniciar la discusión sería interesante leer tus comentarios y conocimiento sobre el tema.
>
>Atentos saludos,
>Natalia
>
>
>
>El 17 de agosto de 2012 12:21, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan at unam.mx> escribió:
>
>Juan Manuel,
>>
>>gracias por este aviso. El trabajo al que te refieres en el mismo, ponerle "candado", inmovilizar, un nombre de dominio sujeto a una controversia bajo UDRP, parecería del mayor interés para los usuarios de Internet a los que decimos representar, ¿no es cierto?
>>
>>Para iniciar los trabajos del WG que citas, se llevó a cabo hace unos meses una encuesta entre los "registrars" y entre los proveedores de resolución de UDRP, que se puede ver en resumen actualizado en https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31174551/Survey+Findings+-+Updated+19+July+2012.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1343133894000
>>
>>Para poner en marcha una intervención por parte de LACRALO creo que es importante ver al menos los siguientes pasos:
>>
>>1. Que nuestros representantes ante ALAC nos informen qué pasos está tomando ALAC al respecto.
>>
>>2. Que la Presidencia de LACRALO proponga un plan de trabajo con fechas, entregables y responsables precisos, asumiendo liderazgo.
>>
>>3. Que cada uno de nosotros explore al interior de nuestras organizaciones qué puntos de vista tienen los usuarios y qué conocimiento y experiencia tienen las personas que llevan a cabo los procedimientos de UDRP.
>>
>>4. Que los abogados miembros de LACRALO, de los que tanto nos habló en estos días Carlos Aguirre, nos expliquen sus experiencias al respecto y nos digan cómo han visto que se afecta a los usuarios, tanto positiva como negativamente, en distintos casos de inmovilización
>>
>> 5.That both lawyers and representatives of users consider the regional effects especficos as the UDRP estreflejada in LDRPS when stas exist in the ccTLDs, and should be expected that changes in the UDRP eventually be reflected in the
LDRPS.
>>
>> Obviously this is a tentative proposal and I am sure other members of LACRALO more immersed in the domain name market and make better podrn disputes.
>>
Alejandro Pisanty >>
>>
>>! ! ! !!
NEW PHONE NUMBER >> - NEW PHONE NUMBER
>>
>>
>>
FROM ABROAD +52-1-5541444475 >>
>>
+525541444475 >> FROM MXICO
>>
SMS +525541444475 >>
Dr. >> Alejandro Pisanty
>> UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>>
>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
UNAM >> Join the group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join >> ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>
________________________________________ >>
>> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Juan Manuel Rojas [jumaropi at yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:37
>> To: LACRALO Espaol
>> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to
>>
>>
WG >> Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings EXTENDED Subject to comment period until September 4.
>>
Http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/udrp-locking-25jul12-en.htm >>
>>
>>
>>
>>
JUAN MANUEL ROJAS >>
Social Communicator >>
>> President - AGEIA DENSI Colombia
>>
>> Twitter: @ JmanuRojas
>>
LACRALO >> Join:
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________ >>
>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list
Lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
Http://www.lacralo.org >>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________ >>
>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list
Lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org >>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
Http://www.lacralo.org >>
>>
>
>
> -
> Natalia.enciso @ gmail.com
>
>
-
natalia.enciso @ gmail.com
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b8ed440a28.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list