[lac-discuss-en] RES: Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to
vanda at uol.com.br
vanda at uol.com.br
Fri Aug 17 18:35:44 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: RES: Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to
From: vanda at uol.com.br
Totally agree Alexander. We have people em our community
com UDRP involved, asescucharlas is an excellent suggestion.
----- Mensagem Original -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Dr.
Baruch Alejandro Pisanty
Posted in: Sexta-Feira, 17 August 2012 12:21
To: Juan Manuel Rojas, LACRALO Espaol
Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Subject to
Proceedings
Juan Manuel,
thanks for this notice. The work you refer to in it, put
"Lock" freeze, a domain name subject to a dispute under
UDRP, will seem of greater interest to Internet users who
we represent, is not it?
To start the work of the WG to appointments, takes out a few months ago
a survey of "registrars" and among the providers of RESOLUTION
UDRP, which can be seen in summary updated
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31174551/Survey+Findings+-+
+19 + +2012 Updated July. Pdf? Version = 1 & modificationDate = 1343133894000
To start a intervencin by LACRALO think it is
important to see at least the following steps:
1. ALAC our representatives to inform us qupasos esttomando
ALAC about it.
2. That the President of LACRALO propose a work plan with dates,
deliverables and responsible precise, assuming leadership.
3. May each of us explore within our organizations
qupuntos have users view and quconocimiento and experience
people have carried out UDRP procedures.
4.That lawyers LACRALO members, of which we speak both these
give Carlos Aguirre, we share their experiences and tell us about it
have seen how that affects users, both positive and
negatively, in several cases of inmovilizacin of names under UDRP.
5. That both lawyers and representatives of users consider the
especficos regional effects, as the UDRP estreflejada in LDRPS
when stas exist in the ccTLDs, and should be expected that changes in
UDRP eventually be reflected in LDRPS.
Obviously this is a tentative proposal and I am sure others
ms LACRALO members stuck in the domain name market and
podrn disputes do better.
Alejandro Pisanty
! ! ! !!
NEW PHONE NUMBER - NEW PHONE NUMBER
FROM ABROAD +52-1-5541444475
FROM +525541444475 MXICO
SMS +525541444475
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn,
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Juan Manuel
Rojas [jumaropi at yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:37
To: LACRALO Espaol
Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Subject to
Proceedings
The WG Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to EXTENDED period
comment until 4 September.
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/udrp-locking-25jul12-en.htm
JUAN MANUEL ROJAS
Social Communicator
President - AGEIA DENSI Colombia
Twitter: @ JmanuRojas
Join LACRALO:
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/90928a626d.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list