[lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =

[Carlton Samuels]

Hi Alberto:
No troubles at all.

In this case the request to the Secretariat is just that: a general
assembly of members be instituted to resolve the issue on a vote.

The motion that accompanies the request will give the reason and should
have two distinct elements. # 1 should be a statement - 'resolved' - that
the Chair's interpretation of the LACRALO Rules of Procedure #8 pertaining
to the residency qualification for election to the ALAC be repudiated.

Part 2 requests that  Humberto Carrasco is recognized as a qualified
candidate.

Cheers,
- Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:06 PM, <asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? ==
> Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =
>  From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>
>  Hi Carlton. In this case you can ask for a vote for the interpretation of
>  the norm, not as a candidate for confirmation? Not the same, no?
> Forgiveness
>  for my ignorance, what is the standard aaplicar?
>  Best Regards
>
>
>  Alberto Soto
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
>  carlton.samuels @ gmail.com
>  Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:51 am
>  To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
>
>
>
>
>  [[- Translated text (in -&gt; en) -]]
>
>
>  Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
>  From: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com
>
>
>  On Thu, August 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok at bango.org.bb>
>  wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > the Chair has a right to interpret rules carte blanche.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  As the presiding officer, the President's chief function is to
>  interpret the rules but not carte blanche. l is limited by the ROP
>  in the first instance.
>
>
>
>
>  Aquestlo good. Each member of the other also has a right
>  unrestricted to interpret those rules.
>
>
>
>
>  And since our propsitos, the President is and should be a
>  member in common,
>  any other member has the right to challenge every
>  interpretation
>  of the Presidency.
>
>
>
>
>  Aquviene good. Each member has the absolute right to request
>  all the other members of his point of view. We call a vote.
>
>
>
>
>  I say again, if you cayperjudicado by the Declaration, then there
>  a
>  remedy. Exercise if necessary.
>
>
>
>
>  - CAS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ==============================
>  Carlton Samuels A
>  Mobile: 876-818-1799
>  * Strategy, planning, government, Evaluaciny deadlines *
>  =============================
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d8ad9d2f42.html
> --]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>