[lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =

asoto at ibero-americano.org asoto at ibero-americano.org
Fri Aug 17 04:28:26 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? = 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Rok, which is the standard estaplicando in that reasoning? 


 Alberto Soto 


 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of 
 rok at bango.org.bb 
 Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:12 a.m. 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) 




 [[- Translated text (in -> en) -]] 


 Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) 
 From: rok at bango.org.bb 


 Carlton, 




 My comprehension of a peticin is that you have a complaint. Then you 
 have to get a certain number of members to agree to 
 peticin support before it is vlida.This depends on many 
 factors that a chair to make a decision that requires members 
 of peticin must be a Decision of serious character, and not a way 
 simplistic and obvious that even decisin required by the President. 
 The President estexponindose to fail and I will not validate 
 executive authority which does not exist. 




 South Korea 




 From: Carlton Samuels 
 Posted on: Thursday, August 16, 2012 23:49 
 To: Webmaster 
 Cc: Jacqueline Morris lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-is] Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC 
 (Part 2) 








 On Thu, August 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok at bango.org.bb>
 wrote: 




  the President has the right to interpret the rules of carte blanche. 




 We do not accept our President, as if he was the bishop of Rome, 
 infallible in all things. 








 As the presiding officer, the President's chief function is to 
 interpret the rules, but not carte blanche. l is limited by the 
 ROP in the first instance. 








 Aquestlo good. Each member of the other also has a right 
 unqualified to interpret the rules, he said. 








 And since our propsitos, the President is and should be a 
 member in common, all the other members have the right to challenge all 
 and every interpretation of the Presidency. 








 Here's the kicker. Each member has the absolute right to request all 
 other members of their point of view. We call a vote. 








 I say again, if you fell prejudiced by the statement, then 
 is a remedy. Exercise if necessary. 








 - CAS 
















 ============================== 
 Carlton Samuels A 
 Mobile: 876-818-1799 
 Strategy, Planning, Government, Evaluation and deadlines 
 ============================= 








 No virus found in this message. 
 Reviewed By AVG - www.avg.com 
 Version: 2012.0.2197 database / Virus: 2437/5204 - Date 
 Posted: 08/16/12 _______________________________________________ 









[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/21c8e44e9d.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list