[lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Fri Aug 17 04:28:26 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Rok, which is the standard estaplicando in that reasoning?
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
rok at bango.org.bb
Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:12 a.m.
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
[[- Translated text (in -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
From: rok at bango.org.bb
Carlton,
My comprehension of a peticin is that you have a complaint. Then you
have to get a certain number of members to agree to
peticin support before it is vlida.This depends on many
factors that a chair to make a decision that requires members
of peticin must be a Decision of serious character, and not a way
simplistic and obvious that even decisin required by the President.
The President estexponindose to fail and I will not validate
executive authority which does not exist.
South Korea
From: Carlton Samuels
Posted on: Thursday, August 16, 2012 23:49
To: Webmaster
Cc: Jacqueline Morris lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-is] Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC
(Part 2)
On Thu, August 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok at bango.org.bb>
wrote:
the President has the right to interpret the rules of carte blanche.
We do not accept our President, as if he was the bishop of Rome,
infallible in all things.
As the presiding officer, the President's chief function is to
interpret the rules, but not carte blanche. l is limited by the
ROP in the first instance.
Aquestlo good. Each member of the other also has a right
unqualified to interpret the rules, he said.
And since our propsitos, the President is and should be a
member in common, all the other members have the right to challenge all
and every interpretation of the Presidency.
Here's the kicker. Each member has the absolute right to request all
other members of their point of view. We call a vote.
I say again, if you fell prejudiced by the statement, then
is a remedy. Exercise if necessary.
- CAS
==============================
Carlton Samuels A
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Government, Evaluation and deadlines
=============================
No virus found in this message.
Reviewed By AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 database / Virus: 2437/5204 - Date
Posted: 08/16/12 _______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/21c8e44e9d.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list