[lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? RES = 09Examen_Final_-_Miembr 3A_ =? == Windows-1252? Q? O_de_la_elecci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Thu Aug 16 17:39:26 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? RES = 09Examen_Final_-_Miembr 3A_ =? == Windows-1252? Q? O_de_la_elecci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? =
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
The decision to Jose Arce was serious. If we vote, we should exclude members of AGEIA?
This issue should be escalated.
Alberto Soto
Sent from my BlackBerry Claro Argentina
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vanda UOL" <vanda at uol.com.br>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:23:16
To: 'Alberto Soto' <asoto at ibero-americano.org> ; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> , 'At-Large Staff' <staff at atlarge.icann.org>
Subject: RES: [lac-discuss-en] Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
Friends, I think we have a clear situation where the most sense to call
a votacin online or by a doodle, to make a backup
decisin serious, that is to exclude a candidate from an election. As I said,
there are against and in favor. With a choice which have achieved
majority of votes wins.And let us then with the suggestion of Charles
Aguirre have a Working Group with lawyers of all the passages where
ALS have, if possible, or at minimum, the most countries members
LACRALO.
As future issues of legal nature we will have this support.
Hugs to all.
Vanda
----- Mensagem Original -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Alberto
Copse
Posted in: fifth-feira, August 16, 2012 9:45
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org, 'At-Large Staff'
Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC
(Part 2)
Dear Members of Staff, there is a way to curb those
aggravate their opinions? Olivier, you really can not do anything?
Who wrongs do it because it is unsubstantiated. And if present, is not
how to express them.
I really urge you to Rok to moderate their language, to say with foundations and
only with what you think. Not what esthaciendo professional.
Given these things just make you want to withdraw from LACRALO.
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
rok at bango.org.bb Posted on: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:27 a.m.
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
[[- Translated text (in -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
From: rok at bango.org.bb
JosArco,
You estfuera of order. If LACRALO is to decide this, then all
members should vote. You can not declare Humberto sOnly not
meet when it does. Tlo have said. Home are
Chile no UK and therefore their residence in Chile is not
the United Kingdom. l is restricted to remain in the UK for a while.
We who are here? A dictatorship? What do you qualify for
a statement? Are you a judge in a case.This is a simple
declarsu opininy cuestin of opinion. The law that are completely
incorrect. Besides dictionary meaning should also
back to the transcripts, notes and any documents of the meeting
to try to determine the intention of the culture was that tomla reunin
decision. You have not done in his speech and this makes their
errnea alleged trial.
Getting tired of this nonsense. A president who does not understand its
paper.
South Korea
----- Original Message -----
From: josefranciscoarce at gmail.com
Posted on: WEDNESDAY, August 15, 2012 16:09
To: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC
(Part
2)
[[- Translated text (s -> s) -]]
Subject: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2)
From: josefranciscoarce at gmail.com
It confuses two concepts: the principal residence and domicile, the
Legislaciny Chilean jurisprudence has clarified and delimited
time.
* Article 59 of the Civil Code defines * Chile * E * (not the
residence) and defines an internal component as
home. The other elements of the house is the minimum
stay there (in residence).
* The home is the residence, accompanied by actual or
presumably, the minimum to stay in it. Divdese in the political
and
civil. *
*
*
* The Supreme Court case of Chile * (C Supreme December 24
1962, R, T 59, section 1, p 478) has discussed this topic.See
Pgina 231:
says:
*
*
* 1. Domicile, residence, habitacin, purple. *
* A) Do not confuse the elements of domicile and residence,
First, that under the civil code is the residence acompaada
the actual or minimum stay in it, is a
valoracin jurdica defined by law Seala elements. In
However, a mere matter of the ratio of residence in fact,
absence
the legal definition, must be understood as natural and obvious meaning of
word, as the effect of acciny of residence, ie the fact that
of
seat in a particular location. *
* In C Concepción, April 28, 1964, R, T 61, Section 4, p. 289
you have
pronounced adjustment: *
* Measure B) Civil, is the address of a person based jurdico and
suite of residence and, in fact, a link between the person and the
where she lives, ordinary or accidentally. *
*
*
* 2) United Kingdom tax shari'ah *
The legislation which is responsible for regulating the issue of
taxes in the
United Kingdom
(Of which Scotland is a part) is also expressed in clear and distinctive
between home and residence.
The residence provides:
UK residence * 2.2 *
* There are many factors that will determine if you are
resident in the UK.With one exception (discussed in paragraph
below),
not simply a question of the number of days that are physically
present in the United Kingdom during the fiscal year, although it is a
important
consideration. *
* The only time that the number of days that you are physically
present
in the UK will determine your residency status is when you
is here to
183
days or more during the fiscal year. If you are here for 183 days or
more in an
fiscal year, you are resident in the UK. There are no exceptions to
this rule. *
* It may also be resident in the UK if they are present here
less than
183 days in a year fiscal.Esto depend on how long and how
are often
Here, the purpose and pattern of their presence and their connections with the
UK. These may include the location of his family, his
property, its
their work life and social relations. *
* Http :/ / www.hmrc.gov.uk/cnr/hmrc6.pdf *
* 3.2 What is the habitual residence? *
* Ordinary residence is different from residence. The Common Word
Indicates that their residence in the UK is typical for you and not
casual.
Do not confuse the habitual residence, established (see
part
4). *
* If you have always lived in the UK who are ordinarily resident
Then you are here.
When you arrive in the UK who have no mayor to remain in the
United Kingdom
Permanently or indefinitely in order to have a residence
usual here. It
enough that your residence has all the following attributes.
*
* Your presence here has a purpose could establecido.Esto
is \\ u200b \\ u200bpor only a limited period, but have continued
enough to be properly
Described as Settled.Business, employment and family can provide
all
stated purpose, but this list is not exhaustive. *
* Their presence in the UK is part of the regular
the usual way of life for the moment. This may include temporary
Absences from the UK.For example, if you come to live in
UK for three
years or more, then you will have established for regular and routine
Mode
of
life here from the beginning. *
* You have to eat in the UK voluntarily. The fact that
has chosen to come to the UK at the request of their employer rather than
find another job does not make their presence here involuntary.
*
* The pattern of his presence, both in the UK and abroad,
is an important
When you are deciding whether the factors have their habitual residence
UK. You
You also need to consider their reasons for being in, reach,
or leave the UK and your lifestyle and habits. Parts 7 and 8 will
help
You With that, they explain the considerations for those who come
to and
leaving the UK. *
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cnr/hmrc6.pdf
* 4.2 What is the address? *
* The home is usually a matter of law, not the
tax law. There are many
Stuff
Affecting their home. Some of the main points you
should
Consider if you're not home to affirm in the UK
shown below:
*
* You can not be without a home. *
* You can only have one domicile at a time. *
* You are domiciled in the country where you normally
Have your permanent home. *
* Your home will continue existing until
buy a new one. *
* Domicile is distinct from nationality and residence,
While both may have an impact at home. *
* The fact that register and vote and abroad
voter does not take into account typically decide when or not
to you
are domiciled in the UK. *
**
* All references to make his home in the UK
refers to
Be domiciled anywhere in the UK. *
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cnr/hmrc6.pdf
* Built-here is a technical term with a meaning.A large
features (and this
is a considerable simplification) An individual is resident in the
United Kingdom if
I was born in the United Kingdom or the United Kingdom is the historic home
permanent and not a
United Kingdom
home if born outside the United Kingdom and Mayor To Remain
permanently. *
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_the_United_Kingdom
* In law, the domicile is the permanent assignment of state or of Being
resident <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resident> In a special **
jurisdiction <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisdiction_%28area%29> .A
**
person domiciled in a jurisdiction may remain even after
you quit,
they have a sufficient connection maintained with that jurisdiction or
have not
It has been an intention to leave permanently (ie, if
that person has MOVED
to a different state, but have no intention of staying
Formed there
indefinitely). A Corporate domicile equals out
STI
of incorporation. *
* Http :/ / en.wikipedia.org / wiki / *** Domicile_ 28law% 29%
*
*
* 3) sharee'ah of Scotland *
*
*
* III.3. ** The personal status and relations in the state
civil (name, domicile, capacity) *
* The address of a person at the time of birth (home of
source) is the same as that of its parent, whenever a child
marriage. [] *
* For over 16 years, assuming they are still home to
origin
You can also choose a different direction. To choose a
different direction is
must actually reside in the jurisdiction, with
intention of remaining there indefinitely or permanently. In the
time missing any of these requirements are reapplied
autonomy of age. [] *
* The cuestin the domicile of a person in a particular country, to
often
be governed by Islamic law of Scotland, except disposicin against,
for example, an international instrument in which the UK is
party. [..] *
http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/applicable_law/applicable_law_sco_es.htm #
III.3.
*
*
* Conclusions *
According to the above, the operating principles as
requires LACRALO
requirement for LACRALO ALAC representative, have their place of
principal residence in different passes of the region.
The rules that define the residence Quse * means * and
use (ascomo acompaada the rest of the shari'ah) use
A similar approach: distinguish between domicile and residence in two
separate and distinct concepts between s.
So my understanding is that the Sr.Humberto Carrasco (L to itself
as
stated in an email discussion list LACRALO) has
the * home * in Chile, but he is now residing
However, as it has indicated its intention to return to Chile at the end
his doctoral thesis, has a present intention that Chile is the
real home, fixed, permanent and principal.Is
where each estausente time, intends to return;
while its * CV *, is that, as the home in
a particular location, the link between the person and place
residence
either regularly or occasionally, with a certain character of permanence,
ie
more than a temporary stay (to complete their studies
PhD) in Scotland.
That is, following the criteria established by the laws applicable to
our case, two concepts should not be confused:
residence and domicile. In the case of Humberto Carrasco has
two passes: Chile and Scotland. The criterion to assign one of these
pass
a house **, is a rule of law and that comments
above: the home of Mr. Carrasco is the criterion Chile.The
assigned to one of them passes a * home *, is a normal event:
Mr.Carrasco is living, living, has a home with a
character of stay (want to finish his doctoral thesis) in the
City of Edinburgh, Scotland (ASO said in his email
electrnicos: desconociencontrarse not live in the city of
Edinburgh and be pursuing doctoral studies at the University of
same name).
*
*
Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of the Rules
LACRALO procedure and observe Article 8 of the Principles
Operating LACRALO requiring representatives LACRALO
ALAC debern that his principal residence in the different steps of the
region and taking into account the analysis performed to determine qudebe
means place of residence, all in uniform as two
separate concepts, residence and domicile. The Presidency
view that Mr. Humberto Carrasco meets the requirements of
residence necessary to be accepted as a candidate in the vlido
electoral process is open to the position of
LACRALO ALAC representative.
Regards
Arce JosFrancisco
President of LACRALO
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/dc2cc15068.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list