[lac-discuss-en] URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia
cveraq at gmail.com
cveraq at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 12:08:20 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia
From: cveraq at gmail.com
We have way this position is reviewed on a URL so we can spread it on twitter or facebook?
They could send a URL to read the entire position?
Best Regards
Carlos Vera
ISOC Ecuador
----- Original Message -----
From: Ageia Densi Colombia <ageiadensicolombia at gmail.com>
Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Date: Tue, April 10, 2012 23:52:11
To: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; <lac-dicuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: [lac-discuss-en] URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia
Dear,
Envo the following letter we have written to establish our voice
protest the approval from the Law 201 of 2012. The law has just been
votacin approved by Congress, the details are in the
letter.I hope you read it and if they're in line suggest that
put the name of your ALS at the end to be sent to Congress
Colombia and disseminated by means of comunicacina name not only of the
users of Colombia, which were not heard but of the whole region.
If anyone wants to read the text in addition to the Law, found here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/629628/LeyTLC/gaceta103InformeDebate.pdf
I look forward to their signatures or support for it, thereof promptly.
Honorable President of the Senate and the Chamber of Representatives of Colombia:
We write on behalf of Internet users in the region of
Latin America and the Caribbean to have a voice in the corporation of the Internet to
Pin Assignments of the names and numbers - given that ICANN existiun trouble
immense to implement the obligations of NAFTA.The process
Total of 20 tardms not give its final since the presentation aprobacin
by the President, all in order to have results qumostrar
during the Summit from the Americas to jointly develop
Cartagena since last April 10 and where the whole estcentrada
attention of the means of communication.
As I write these lines, the project has just finished his votaciny has
been approved by what awaits presidential sancin, ie a
fact that it is a Law We greatly concerned about the whole process
was carried out as hidden ms yrpida possible and were not
into account civil society groups in this trmite and without even
debate.
Remember that the same users you Colombians joined to
discuss with you the merits of that Act in matters as important as the
following:
1. By implementing the measures PROTECTION 'technology (MPT) as a
PROTECTION independent copyright may violate rules
internal.The implementacin must be such that the PROTECTION of
MPT is not independent but linked to the right PROTECTION
author that occurs in Colombia. The topic has been discussed in forums such as the
Australia,
http://www.ivir.nl/publications/guibault/Infosoc_report_2007.pdf and Chile
https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/FTAA/20040830_uschile_fta.pdf
http://ictsd.org/i/publications/120934/. The central problem is that if
this is not possible generation asse civil and criminal liability
users for use in the exercise of exceptions and limitations stbNL> <tbSP 2> allows our law, that is, I can order the jail by
circumvent a TPM to make a private copy which I have the right.
2. May also violate the rights of users if, as in this
version, it establishes the administrative procedure itself TLC
includes every 4 years to adjust these exceptions. The project is not
developed the procedure but only a general facutlad government
to propose changes. We wonder then, to quel afn?Nor
being met with all the obligations of NAFTA, lack this.
3. The bill defines very broadly profit to include any
advantage. There are exceptions and limitations such as private copying, which
dependent on this definition. However when using it own FTA talks
commercial advantage or financial gain. That is no obligation definacin
NAFTA not match your text and may violate users' interests.
4. If not properly drafted prohbe item that the
signal retransmission of Internet TV can also compromise
interests of users, because as that across the board estevita
exceptions and limitations apply to the retransmission of television signals
Internet. That is not the scope of the obligation of the FTA, it is against
of our line with national standards and perhaps it forbids censorship
to date?
5. There is a great preocupacin by delegating judicial functions, as
is the delivery of personal information to an administrative authority.As
we said in the debate on the Law Lleras in the Rule of Law
judges are the only ones that have powers to restrict rights and
fundamental freedoms and thus the only ones that can deliver
personal information (Excerpt taken from the comments of jurdicos
RedPaTodos)
Unfortunately they were not the only ones users not heard in this
non-debate, a group of professors from the American University in United
States also joined the worry of the community concluded that
ms will effectively alldel TLC, which provides more powerful
that American internal standards and that the result can generate
competitive disadvantages between the parties to the trade agreement. The
peticin academics support the Colombian civil society to discuss
openly put the text to see, if possible, the various
interest and comply with internal rules.
The teachers are surprised that in terms of these items are
penalize speeding isolated individuals even when playing the parts without
know, indicate no application of the principle of proportionality
that exists in the U.S. so that only penalizes activities with a
some commercial dimension whose measure gives mnima law (for example 10
minimum value copies U.S. 2500). In addition, sealan and project that should
include as a minimum for medical evaluation of the three-step test as a
to determine whether an action is criminal or not.
As if this were not enough, EFF, Electronic Frontier Foundation, is also
pronuncicon a statement April 9 that Lamla attention on
the TLC tendrel implementacin inadequate in our country, highlighting
prescribed a law how copyright is necessary for balanced
proper balance of rights.
Civil society has sent requests and comments to
Congress to call for reflection and ask them to indicate their
Voting will ultimately is a form of control that has the citizen
veedura is the process and their ability to choose their
representatives. The strategy is not new, the movements have used
civil over the last month and appears to be endlessly
giving life to a form of direct participation to politics
Governments find it difficult to articulate but seen as a form of freedom of
expresiny of civil rights is something that takes a value
democrtico impressive system. The public pressure is not
will put a stop.
Respectfully,
ICANN ALS deLACRALO
-
AGEIA DENSI COLOMBIA
www.ageiadensi.org / co
nete our
Association < https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHZTX2lRN1ZLdDFBMDNIMTBxcFpRSWc6MQ>
Join our
study <http://www.esurveyspro.com/Survey.aspx?id=656ad9b0-372e-49c5-8498-2fb343ebe330>
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a0e0153a4d.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list