[lac-discuss-en] RES: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? == Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? =

Mon Mar 5 17:59:13 UTC 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: RES: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? == Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? = 
 From: natalia.enciso at gmail.com

 Jaquie Exactly, because continuing to violate the statute?. 

 It's what we're trying to fix with the amendments to the statute that has many gaps and contradictions that create confusiny carry all this is happening now. 

 If you read well the order is only operating principles. Still missing are the rules of procedure to have a status consistent and whole. 

 And as for the group say it is not so secret. The original working group 2 years ago that was formed and I move on some issues. But I leave the job unfinished. 

 When applying for the realization of this House always ask for the primary purpose of amending the statutes. You can hear the audio and read transcripts where Sylvia repeatedly to the order including the mailing list.No pidicomo main objective the realization of the WS as requested by the secretary. If we are to follow the lines to see ghosts where there are none, I also may have doubts and think that this request is hidden cat. 

 If all members of the WG Modification of statutes were active and willing to continue working because they did not? How long have been known to Harla AG and that they were the Modification of statutes? Asked not published but now that he sent another proposal if they appear. 

 The proposal submitted is a request for amendment in accordance with existing statutes that set aslo saying that anyone can send request for amendment and ask to be included in the order of the day with 15 das of anticipacin, but the reasons for the request. 

 All these requirements were met and sent to the list, no transparency and There is not any secret group. 

 And finally I agree with Sergio to say that the only thing that is received while working are critical and questioning, there is no support or discussion on a professional level, with knowledge of the rules.

 With no reason to ever move forward in the study and analysis of POLICIES. We miss the bush and do not touch the substantive issues. 

 These attitudes are very disappointing. 
 It is my opinion. 
 Natalia 
 Sent from my BlackBerry Provedo by Tigo. 

 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: &quot;Vanda UOL&quot; <vanda at uol.com.br>
 Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:22:33 
 To: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] RES: =? Iso-8859-1? 
 Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == Iso-8859-1? 
 Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? 
 == Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? = 

 Jackie + 1 

 ----- Mensagem original ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome 
 jam at jacquelinemorris.com 
 Posted in: Sunday, 4 2012 22:06 maro 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? 
 Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == Iso-8859-1? Q? 
 _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? == Iso-8859-1? Q?
 2013? = 

 [[- Translated text (in -&gt; en) -]] 

 Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == 
 Iso-8859-1? Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? == 
 Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? = 
 From: jam at jacquelinemorris.com 

 I'm confused by all these references to work in secret. It 
 Translation An this a problem or as Cintra indicated in your email 
 electronic this morning, one will deliberately ignore some 
 LACRALO members? 
 All these comments tend to make me think that something is real, the 
 activities going on LACRALO shadow? 
 As far as I s, ah ESTN rules, even if it were 
 suspendiignoro breaks in the year 2009, followed qudebemos 
 doing the wrong thing in 2012? 

 Jacqueline A. Morris 
 The technology should be like oxygen: ubiquitous, necessary, invisible and 
 Free. (AfterChris Lehmann) 

 The Sun, March 4, 2012 at 7:53 PM, <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
 wrote: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Convocatoria_de_candidaturas_para? == 
> Iso-8859-1? Q? _la_LACRALO_Presidente_y_la_Secretar = EDa_para_2012-? 
> == Iso-8859-1? Q? 2013? =
>  From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>
>  Dear Dev and all
>
>
>  Dev, this is a paragraph shall send for you, &quot;Asel artculo 13 is 
> especfico
>  with respect to the choice of representatives LACRALO required a
>  two months' notice before any LACRALO Assembly convened for
>  elect representatives of LACRALO. Given that The term
>  of one year of the President and secrete ending April 14, 2012, the
>  call for applications must have started before mid-
>  February 2012 in LACRALO distribution list, but with the
>  LACRALO planning of events in Costa Rica, this call does not
>  was made. &quot;
>
>
>  In fact, if The term of President and Secretary expires on 14 March
>  2012, according to these articles the choice should call for having
>  made by the Secretary before February 9, 2012.And was not
>  breach of the provisions of the ROP. If requested by the choice 
> hubiramos
>  the AG in Costa Rica, Cundo had made the choice? Despus of
>  the date of term?
>
>
>  Also I have seen several comments requesting compliance with the 
> rules, and
>  including a possible veto According the last conference call, which 
> only
>  I will join Adobe and haltingly because of bad
>  communication in my home. Unattested it were not veto or by whom.
>  Also comments on misrepresentations mails or work in secret.
>
>
>  In principle, I am attached to the rules, and therefore particularly
>  I demand. I see that in the General Assembly of Mxico not filled in
>  so, now the call for elections of President and Secretary,
>  either. In turn we ask flexibilizacin so they can register
>  two LAs than most think that should not be released.
>  And estexigiendo the compliance, but to the letter. There
>  an obvious contradiction ...
>  Really, I insist, I'm stuck to the rules, but to require
>  must first be met and became aquno or esthaciendo.No
>  groups working in secret or misrepresenting things, only people 
> working,
>  setting an example to other members of the LAs. Pro other hand, there
>  another course of action, require no foundation and unfulfilled, 
> really
>  removes the desire to work. And that was not settled with a session 
> of
>  concientizacino knowledge with us in Costa Rica. Only
>  conducciny transparent management in the example, must motivation for
>  it.
>  I think they've completed all the orders that had secreted
>  done, and I would like to see this track in a good way, not
>  intiles confrontations and hostile comments that do not lead
>  absolutely nothing.
>  If this is ace, I have thought about my trip and desist from removing 
> the Institute
>  as ALS. I want to work, I will not discuss intilmente and no results.
>  And really want to get, for the sake of Internet users, not
>  by us.
>  Best Regards
>
>
>  Alberto Soto
>  Director IIISI
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
>  devtee at gmail.com
>  Posted on: Sunday, March 4, 2012 1:05 a.m.
>  To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  Subject: Call for nominations for President and LACRALO
>  Secreted for 2012-2013
>
>
>
>
>  [[- Translated text (in -&gt; en) -]]
>
>
>  Subject: Call for nominations for President and LACRALO
>  Secreted for 2012-2013
>  From: devtee at gmail.com
>
>
>  Hi all,
>
>
>
>
>  According to the Organization of LACRALO Documents (
>  https://community.icann.org/x/Oo0i),
>  LACRALO and secrete LACRALO is one year each.
>  The terms of the current president and secrete LACRALO finalizarel
>  April 15, 2012.
>
>
>
>
>  The current president is JosFrancisco LACRALO Maple Ageia Densi
>  Argentina's current LACRALO is secreted Teelucksingh of Dev Anand
>  Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society
>
>
>
>
>  If there is any representative of an ALS accredited LACRALO
>  vlidas that wishes are for either
>  - The president of LACRALO.
>  or
>  - The position of secreted LACRALO,
>
>
>
>
>  ENVE an email to the Secretariat in admin at ttcsweb.org.
>
>
>
>
>  Note:
>  In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the LACRALO, nominations
>  will be accepted by a period minimum of 4 weeks from the date of
>  the call for Nominations, with the choice that no tendrlugar
>  within 48 hours after the expiry of 8 weeks from the
>  date of the call for nominations. (Rules 13.1, 13.2, 13.3)
>
>
>
>
>  However, a GA was carried out LACRALO for the ingathering of ICANN
>  Costa Rica, Wednesdays from March 14, 2012.
>
>
>
>
>  Several ALS have expressed their intention to submit motions to the 
> Assembly
>  General
>  allow the election of President and secrete LACRALO to take
>  place during the General Assembly. If these motions are approved by 
> the
>  Assembly
>  then presented the list of candidates considered for this
>  type
>  choice.
>
>
>
>
>  ---
>
>
>
>
>  Best regards,
>
>
>
>
>  Dev Anand Teelucksingh
>  LACRALO Secretariat
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/de27068045.html
--]]