[lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Explicaciones_a_Enmiendas? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _a_los_Principios_Operativos_de_LACRALO_solicitada_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Por_la_Secretar = EDa_de_LACRALO? =
vanda at uol.com.br
vanda at uol.com.br
Mon Mar 5 17:15:29 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Explicaciones_a_Enmiendas? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _a_los_Principios_Operativos_de_LACRALO_solicitada_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Por_la_Secretar = EDa_de_LACRALO? =
From: vanda at uol.com.br
Fatima, after reading the document suggested that if the group concluded
first created for the modifications do not think it was a group accredited
Nor is the freshly group.
It seems to me that, although without the curum necessary, bean a focus group
with work on the same subject, and therefore, any new group
should, at minimum out of respect for colleagues, inclusion in the new
group.
Assigo understanding that if there are other proposals they must be on
the table so that everyone has knowledge of them.
To make it easy, here in English
Fatima, after reading the document Suggested below you, That if I Conclude
the oldest group to discussion These issues Was not accredited, so Is not the new
one too.
> From my point of view, events without a needed quorum, the oldest group Have
done some work and Any new group, at least by Respect to our colleagues,
Should include Them to the new group.
THEREFORE, still my Belief That if there are other Proposals for by Laws
Amendments, They Shall be over the table to all to know.
Thanks,
Vanda Scartezini
Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org and candidate-it!
Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply!
Polo Consulting Associates
IT Trend
Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407
01418-903 So Paulo, SP, Brazil
Tel + 5511 3266.6253
Mob + 55118181.1464
Dissemine this idia:
Enter or domain ao telefone do research.
Domain dialing
www.siter.com
----- Mensagem original -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Fatima
Cambronero
Posted in: Sunday, 4 2012 20:54 maro
To: LACRALO Espaol, Dev Anand Teelucksingh, At-Large Staff
Assunto: [lac-discuss-en] Explanation of Amendments to the Principles
LACRALO operating requested by the secreted LACRALO
Dear,
According to the requirements of the secreted LACRALO on a
give back, it accompany a explicacina regarding amendments to
Operating Principles LACRALO proposal (and sent to the list a few days
ATRS), we acompaando those explanations.
According to the request made by the LACRALO secrete this
explanation must be part of the Proposed Amendment to the Principles
Operational, so I request to our Secretary, to release all
means that this explanation is translated inglsy is at
disposicin of all in date has been set to limit, is
say, on Monday, March 5, 2012.
I am attaching a document such explanations. Pdf format and
sharing a link where you can find online:
http://www.box.com/s/kvd3e57po1tzkykp5jz0
All those who requested explanations on the list of LACRALO
some points ESTN proposing to amend, may review this
document.
Regards,
Fatima Cambronero
-
* Fatima Cambronero *
Attorney-Argentina
Director of Research
* Argentina * AGEIA DENSI
http://ar.ageiadensi.org/
* @ Facambronero *
* Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: *
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5ebc2b8867.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list