[lac-discuss-en] RES: my comments on the Amendment

[vanda at uol.com.br]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: RES: my comments on the Amendment 
 From: vanda at uol.com.br

 As Trasnlation not very clear. Esclarezco few points: 
 My proposal of releccin cuestin peels for over 2 years: concordcon the 
 releccin principle but I think we should reduce to + 1 year (no + 2) 
 the participation of reelected to ensure more opportunities for others 
 candidatearse. 
  The other is sent cuestin (alternate) to ALAC is to reaffirm 
 ALAC decide not LACRALO. 
 I be interesting to know other opinions. 
 Hugs 
 ----- Mensagem original ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome 
 vanda at uol.com.br 
 Posted in: sbado, 3 maro 2012 19:39 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Cc: 'Heidi Ullrich'; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Assunto: [lac-discuss-en] my comments on the Amendment 




 [[- Translated text (in -> en) -]]


 Subject: My comments on the Amendment 
 From: vanda at uol.com.br 


 Aqumi analysis to share with you everything about the 
 proposed amendments. I'm not sure if my commitment NOMCOMM 
 be able to participate in all sessions, asque decidcompartir 
 my views with you all. 




 Seala I have something to say in the most prominent for below. 




 Thanks 




 VANDA 








 Items proposed by a group 




 My comments 








 1) the right to vote in ALS LACRALO matters determined by a 
 minimum level of participation 




 This is positive 








 2) the working languages \u200b\u200bexpanded to francsy Portugus 




 I see no need and may be too expensive.But this is not a 
 main preocupacin. 
 (But I see APRALO working in over 20 languages \u200b\u200bthat have 
 there 








 3) eliminates the concept of operating by consensus 
 > Desde mi punto de vista esto es contra uno de los principio de la ICANN a
 consensus 








 4) creation of Vice 




 Those can not be aadir to normal ALAC representation without 


 the decision to ALAC smismo. Not for LACRALO to decide. Vase 
 tambinms forward in the 
 item 8 








 5) the clauses of President and Vice eligible for two 
 terms of two 
 each years 




 This make some sense, as the representation in ALAC requires 
 degree of 
 learning, so a year is a short term. But 
 second term will be 
 one year to allow others to participate. 








 6) creation of the position of Vice-Ministry 




 Just as Vice President 








 7) LACRALO elect 2 people to be part of ALAC and other 2 as 
 its 




 alternates (diversity requirements shall not apply to 
 choice 
 ALAC member and alternate). 




 I disagree - the diversity apply. The principles of the 
 ICANN states 
 diversidad.La concentration of people of one country, for example, 
 neither democratic nor safe for the organization. (I imagine that if the two 


 major countries of Mexico and Brazil decided to make a strong movement for 
 take 
 in this group, you can control all positions) is not really 
 insurance. It should 
 has diversity. 








 8) The deputy or assistant can take ALAC representative in case of 
 any 
 inability of the chief representative of ALAC 




 I think this will be submitted to ALAC, we can not decide the next time 
 shall send the ALAC meeting is another 








 9) ALAC member can be reappointed for a period of 2 nd year 
 two 




 The election is the same principle of one year for a second term 
 to allow other 
 participate. 








 10) creation of a directory of LACRALO or Board with LACRALO 
 administrative 
 and operational functions. This includes persons elected in 
 LACRALO 
 (President, Vice President, Secretary, Assistant Secretary, the two LACRALO 
 elected representatives and their alternates ALAC) and five Policy


 Managers who lead work groups within LACRALO and 
 in 
 responsible for selecting members within their groups 
 Policy trabajo.Directores 
 be elected by the General Assembly by simple majority. 












 In my opinion, this will mean too general and not to command 
 troops 
 but does not affect at all. 




  3 would be good to one member of the Caribbean region and two 
 America 
 region also maintain diversity and yet be reasonable (not 
 there 
 members of both LACRALO really works so I do not think 
 will 
 enough groups to work under 5 political directors). 
 But it is not relevant 








 11) states that the elections can take place almost 




 This is good, but needs clear tools must be available 
 to prevent one of the members 
 to vote for all ALS under his command - only allow this after 
 check the safety of the tool. 








 12) the changes would be applicable to existing mandates 
 President, 
 Secretary 




 I do not agree that if he would have a one year term only. 




 The application of change for the benefit of existing members elected 
 sight 
 manipulation. 




 The same people may be a candidate and be elected, but the extension of 
 mandate, 
 looks is not democratic. That's the way ditactors used to maintain 
 in place 
 Totally against. 








 13) The constitution of the Board of LACRALO be held after the 
 first 
 election to be held immediately at the time of these reforms 
 approved. 




 It is not so relevant. 




























 Vanda Scartezini 




 Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org candidate-mail is! 




 Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply! 




 Polo Consultores Asociados 




 IT Trend 




 Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407 




 01418-903 São Paulo, SP, Brazil 




 Tel + 5511 3266.6253 




 Mobile + 55118181.1464 




 Dissemine this idia: 




 Enter or research domain or unable to call. 




 Dialing domain 




 Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com>
 www.siter.com 





































[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bdaf1e350e.html
--]]