[lac-discuss-en] my comments related the ammendment

Sun Mar 4 14:20:27 UTC 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: my comments related the ammendment 
 From: cintra.sooknanan at gmail.com

 Greetings LACRALO 

 Upon review of the Proposals I express my displeasure Must With The 
 Which drafting totally disregards the Proposals made by Caribbean ALSes 
 Both Publicly on the list and calls, and Internally to the By Law 
 Modification Working Group. The Fact That our point of view was not 
 Captured In This document Clearly Demonstrates That not was the drafter 
 Objective and only chose to Represent the Proposals of herself and to 
 segment of LACRALO. Was this action fraction Meant to our relations and 
 my sub-region sideline further, or is it simply a matter of ignorance on 
 the part of the writer? I ask you to Consider the answer. 

 This vision of the new Proposed lacralo is an administrative blunder. It is 
 top heavy, disregards diversity, usurps the role of ALAC and ICANN, has no 
 Mechanisms for encouraging and shows a clear Participation Lack of 
 Understanding of the Responsibility of Elected members.I am heartened by 
 Vanda hopeful That's contribution and this wisdom will be heeded. I also 
 wish to make a formal request in moving forward That With Any structural 
 Lacralo Changes That We seek advice from our At Large's Regional 
 Coordination Team, who are well Experienced and knowledgeable in this Area, 
 HAVING overseen structural changes file in other Ralos. 

 By way of background I Have Been On this working group since the Cartagena 
 meeting in 2010 and this is the first time there Has Been Any indication of 
 the formation of a board of directors. It is alarming to me that it has 
 Been put to lacralo without Any discussion and Represented as the work of 
 By Law Modification the Working Group. In Fact, while I am in agreement 
 with Vanda's points, I Differ in her review on point 10) Which Refers to 
 lacralo the Directory Board. I request the writer of These Proposals to 
 Explain the reasoning behind the lacralo Directory Board and as a matter of 
 urgency to save her reputation by sending a revised draft of Proposals 
 Which captures ALL the Amendments Proposed by the By Law Modification 
 Working Group. 

 Thank you 

 Cintra Sooknanan

 On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:39 PM, <vanda at uol.com.br> wrote: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: my comments related the ammendment
>  From: vanda at uol.com.br
>
>  Here my analysis to share with you all related to the Proposal
> Amendments. I
>  am not sure my due if I commit with NOMCOMM will will be Able to
> Participate
>  in all sessions, so I Decided to share my opinions are With All of you.
>
>
>  Point I have something to say in highlight below.
>
>
>  Thanks
>
>
>  VANDA
>
>
>
>
>  Points Proposed by one group
>
>
>  My comments
>
>
>
>
>  1) the right to vote in ALSes of affairs LACRALO Determined by a
>  minimum level of participation
>
>
>  This is positive
>
>
>
>
>  2) working languages \u200b\u200bFrench and Portuguese expanded to
>
>
>  I dont see need and may be too expensive. But this is not a main concern
> '.
>  (But I dont see APRALO working in the more than 20 languages
> \u200b\u200bThey Have
>  there
>
>
>
>
>  3) Removes the concept of operating by consensus
>  > From my point of view this is one of ICANNs Principle Against build
>  consensus
>
>
>
>
>  4) creation of Vice President
>
>
>  Those persons can not be added to the normal representation without at
> ALAC
>  the decision of ALAC itself. Not for LACRALO to decide. See also below on
>  item 8
>
>
>
>
>  5) terms of President and Vice President for two terms of eligible 2
>  Each years
>
>
>  This make some sense, since representation in ALAC Demands Some degree of
>  learning, so one year is short term indeed. But the second term Shall Be
>  one year to allow Others to Participate.
>
>
>
>
>  6) creation position of Vice Secretariat
>
>
>  Same vice president of
>
>
>
>
>  7) LACRALO would serve to elect 2 persons and 2 Others on ALAC as Their
>
>
>  respective alternates (diversity not apply to Marshall Requirements
> Elected
>  ALAC member and Their alternate).
>
>
>  I disagree - diversity Shall apply. The Principles of ICANN states on
>  diversity.The concentration of persons from just one country for instance,
>  Neither is not safe for the Democratic organization. (Imagine if the two
>  Mexico and Brazil big country clubs decide to make a strong movement to
> take
>  over this group, can be all the control positions) really not safe. Must
>  Have diversity.
>
>
>
>
>  8) The alternate or deputy can assume the ALAC rep in case of Any
>  Inability of the primary ALAC rep
>
>
>  I Believe This Shall be submitted to ALAC, We can not decide the next time
>  member sat to ALAC meeting is another
>
>
>
>
>  9) the ALAC member can be re-Elected for a two year term 2nd
>
>
>  Reelection has the Same Principle 1 year for second term to allow Others
> to
>  Participate.
>
>
>
>
>  10) creation of a LACRALO LACRALO Directory Board with administrative or
>  and operative functions. This will Comprise the persons Elected in LACRALO
>  (President, Vice-President, Secretary, Deputy Secretary, the two LACRALO
>  Elected Representatives and Their alternates to ALAC) and five Policy
>  Directors who would lead Different working groups within The LACRALO and
> in
>  Selecting members within The charge of Their working groups.Policy
> Directors
>  would be Elected by the General Assembly by simple Majority.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  In my opinion This Will mean too much and not generals to command Troops
>  Impact but no at all.
>
>
>  3 would be good one member of Caribbean region and two from Latin
>  region too keep at Same Time diversity and be reasonable (there is no
>  members that really works much in so I dont LACRALO believe it will be
>  enough groups to work under 5 policy directors). But not so relevant
>
>
>
>
>  11) Establishing elections can take place That Virtually
>
>
>  This is good, but needs clear tools available to Avoid Must be one member
>  to vote for all the ALS under ITS command - Allow This only after
>  check the security of the tool.
>
>
>
>
>  12) Amendments would be applicable to Existing mandates of President,
>  Secretary
>
>
>  I am not in behalf of That, only if WAS To Have Just One More year term.
>
>
>  Application of the change in benefice of the Existing Elected members
> looks
>  manipulation.
>
>
>  Same people can be candidate and be Elected, But Extending the mandate,
>  looks not Democratic. Thats the way ditactors use to keeping in place
>  Totally Against.
>
>
>
>
>  13) The constitution of the Board of LACRALO be Held after the first
>  Immediately election to be Held at the time of These Amendments be
> approved.
>
>
>  Not so relevant.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Vanda Scartezini
>
>
>  Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org and candidate-it!
>
>
>  Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply!
>
>
>  Polo Consulting Associates
>
>
>  IT Trend
>
>
>  Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407
>
>
>  01418-903 So Paulo, SP, Brazil
>
>
>  Tel + 5511 3266.6253
>
>
>  Mob + 55118181.1464
>
>
>  Dissemine this idia:
>
>
>  Enter or domain ao telefone do research.
>
>
>  Domain dialing
>
>
>  Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com>
>  www.siter.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/994ed28577.html
--]]