[lac-discuss-en] REMINDER - TODAY / LACRALO Costa Rica Events press conference Working Group on Thursday March 1st, 2012 at 20:00 UTC
fatimacambronero at gmail.com
fatimacambronero at gmail.com
Sat Mar 3 05:30:25 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: REMINDER - TODAY / LACRALO Costa Rica Events press conference Working Group on Thursday March 1st, 2012 at 20:00 UTC
From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com
Dear,
Yesterday I could not participate in the teleconference (apologies Jospresentmis
the time of initiation of the same). I like to do some Asque
comments have to do with the points, which from my point of view,
were treated yesterday, and that deal specifically with the
realization of our General Assembly in Costa Rica and points of
Order of Daa be included.
There are some points that I will leave out, trying to be as brief ms
possible.
Some people expressed confusion about some points. I'm going
placing the name of the speaker before and after my comment.
* Carlton *: There are several issues.
First, whether to treat the choice at the beginning or end of the Assembly
General.
* Fátima *: If you see the order of Da of the proposed agenda for the AG, the
choice of the President and Secretary, Estal beginning of it, and within
and General Assembly, after electing Assembly Official
General roll call of delegates present ALS, control proxies
and have adopted the Agenda or Order of the proposed Da.
This is not whimsical. It aims to achieve a General Assembly
orderly, and obviously the choice of these officers is to be performed
* Operating with the Principles and Rules of Procedure in force *, which are
the only ones that we can grant rights and impose obligations on a day of
today. The other is a proposed amendment, no legal value to date.
Adopcin discusiny missing (or not) by the AG, the only sovereign to
take such decisions.
Again, this proposed Order of Da, has the intention of this
matter not be mixed or pay down any confusion to the issue
of discusiny adopcin (or not) of the proposed amendments to the Principles
Operating LACRALO.
* Carlton * And if they will do basndose the Statute or Rules
existing Procedure.
The term we use Statute or Rules of Procedure
interchangeably. Then we have to determine cules Sern Rules
Procedure, and whether to do on quReglas of Procedure.
So it should be clear about this.
* Fátima *: If you use it is either a habit, bad
acquired and is misleading.
LACRALO official documents, published on the website LACRALO (
https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+Organising+Documents)
both the version in Spanish and in the version in English, apart
clearly between: LACRALO Operating Principles and Rules of
LACRALO procedure.
In no time there was confusion on our part in the proposals
made. We are aware that discuss the proposed amendments on
Operating Principles, will be something that will take a long time,
which clearly decided not to try anything at this time referred to
our Rules of Procedure.
Both in the e-mails to the list of discussion, as in
attached proposed amendments, the expression is utilizsiempre
Operating Principles. In no time Our proposed amendments to
Rules of Procedure. Please check the mail sent to the list
including the proposed Amendment to the Operating Principles as
Agenda or Order of the proposed Da.
* Carlton * In all these years there was no clear understanding of what
established in the Rules of Procedure regarding the election.
The Rules of Procedure are clear.
Second, by QUNO is a requirement for the Legal Department
ICANN to adopt our Rules of Procedure. All the rules
are completed or terminated once we have the view of the Advisory
Counsel.
* Fátima: * And sought QUNO Adoption of the Law Department
ICANN Mxico General Assembly, when they decided to incorporate
President of LACRALO figure, which immediately approved the
two paragraphs shall added to the end of Principle 4 of the Principles
Operating, is the choice of the President proceeded LACRALO?
* Carlton * But this is not as. So if there is a vote for votacino
change the Statutes or Rules of Procedure, and these votes are
quorum, are legal, we can not do anything with the new rules until
Counsel or the Legal Department of the ICANN approves.
* Fátima: * In official qudocumento LACRALO say that? That does not estni in
Operating Principles or Rules of Procedure. The MoU between
ICANN and the techniques LACRALO amendments is referred to
amendments to the MoU, in Section 6.3.1. (Stating that debern be
in the General Assembly of LACRALO), but at no time states that
to take effect, debern be approved by the Department
Legal ICANN.Therefore, even by analogous to the document
LACRALO creator, comes the requirement of the Department sujecin
ICANN's legal for an amendment has legal value.
Moreover, this alleged requirement of approval of amendments by
ICANN's Legal Department, clearly contradicts with the
happened in the General Assembly Mxico 2009. For QUNO gave
intervencin ICANN's Legal Department when decidimodificar the
Principle 4 of our operating principles, incorporating the figure of
President of LACRALO, when the person who leads it General Assembly
LACRALO was fifth l met this requirement? So this Modification
is added in Mxico vlida, estvigente not, is illegal, go
against a requirement of no knows where?
Also, refer to an email in which I respond to Vanda on the subject of
ICANN lawyers. Ahexpresque if necessary we will consult
these lawyers, but for the moment (drafting of the proposal
amendment) necesitbamos not as participate in LACRALO
many lawyers as volunteers.
I agree to seek advice to ICANN's Legal Department,
once we have approved.
And I liked this mail make a formal request and ask
the Secretary of LACRALO to arbitrate the means to make this happen. * Request
algnoa invite some members of ICANN's Legal Department
Observers of our General Assembly. I would like to ask in addition, that
consult all members of LACRALO if they're under this
request or not. And if necessary, use all means to
votacin make a decision about it and according to the will
majority of our RALO. *
*
*
* Carlton: * It must be understood by the members that if you have
an organization that estregulada and limited by the rules, it should be
as. It must first learn, self has to learn, and
which is more challenging, need to understand the meaning of these rules.
* Fátima: * S, I totally agree.And I add, especially
must be informed and trained those who hold positions
leadership and lead the destinies of RALO.
To these people this I, as a member of LACRALO, I demand
transparency and clarity in its manifestations, both written and
oral. Anyone familiar with the Operating Principles and Rules of
LACRALO procedure and no capacity to transmit
properly, without a cause confusion among members of
LACRALO, and not get tired of explaining them as often as necessary,
for me, this leadership must be analyzed.
* Carlton * Qurum to the General Assembly said that the Rules of
Procedure will require 50% of all accredited ALS, 50% more
a.
* Fátima: * When referring to the ALS accredited estdiciendo
ALAC accredited as ALS or credited to the General Assembly.
Because the Rules of Procedure in Section 6.1., Provide:
* Rule 6 - Qurum
6.1 The quorum consistiren the simple majority of ALS credited against
referred to in Rule 1.1 and that are present and represented in the
Assembly. *
*
*
As is clear from this Rule, the quorum required for the
General Assembly to sit vlidamente is of the simple majority of the
* Acreditas ALS present and in the Assembly *. Not accredited to ALAC.
On the issue of election of President and Secretary of LACRALO, esttbNL> specifically included in the proposed Agenda or Order of the Day of the
General Assembly. * Request the Secretary to make the call
nominations, to be held in the Assembly elections
General of Costa Rica. * If you make that call for nominations,
Secretary estarincumpliendo its obligations, which are only
and administrative information, and estardecidiendo (when that is not his
function) against expressed by several members of LACRALO.
Again, if it is not clear that this is the will of many members who
expressed openly put for the realization of elections
President and Secretary in our General Assembly in Costa Rica *
formally requested to submit the proposed Agenda or Order of
Da, to the vote of all members of LACRALO. *
*
*
In relacina the time to make this call for nominations,
I have no very clear quel current President and Secretary
decided not to meet the deadlines established by our rules
Procedure and extend them all until Monday March 5 for all
modems procedural issues, and QUNO can apply the same
extension to the call for nominations for President and Secretary.
Culture is the criterion used to implement this discriminacin of
exceptions?
Another point I would like to comment on the meetings of construction
consensus.As you know those who regularly participate in our
monthly teleconferences (and we have been taking every Thursday
connection with events in Costa Rica) at first I was not very
sessions according to the construction of consensus (or Working Sessions)
proposed.
In the last days cambide opinion. And I'm looking forward to
time comes for the sake of transparency that should exist in
all organizations serious (or pride themselves on such) and the respect
must prevail for all members of the same (whether they are
participating for 5 days or 5 years), I think that will be a
excellent experience, so that together we listen, and express
freely the reasons why you believe our RALO
through this crisis is growing.
It is not necessary for someone estdesde the beginning of RALO to
review, much less to learn, manage, observe and enforce
our Operating Principles and / or our Rules of Procedure. The
lack of knowledge, be recovered, with reading and study, with
dedication, time and patience.The lack of respect for the principles
Operating Procedure and Rules, are not correctable or over
time and with all the patience in the world.
Regards,
Fátima Cambronero
-
* Fatima Cambronero *
Attorney-Argentina
Director of Research
* Argentina * AGEIA DENSI
http://ar.ageiadensi.org/
* @ Facambronero *
* Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: *
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ba8419421c.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list