[lac-discuss-en] RES: Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs
vanda at uol.com.br
vanda at uol.com.br
Thu Jan 26 14:41:54 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: RES: Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs
From: vanda at uol.com.br
I think your scan is correct as to be of direct interest
communities. The new gTLDs are non any community to enroll in
the program. But for large financial companies or interests
international, especially for companies in our countries, which
failed to win a good space under the dot com, if the opportunity
very useful. In the Brazils sells minimally'm getting into this
process from the first day. For me the reason because I personally saltbNL> discusin of the group seeking support for communities, it is because
ningn was no interest for communities when talking to them
for here, clearly - because in fact there.
.I welcome the de facto cost of having to pass REDUCTION
poor, but non of the many rich of these passes (there is always more
rich in many poor passes proportionally than in the passes
Many rich), disgusted at the end I do not think it will be useful even this
REDUCTION.
It you do not have the Economic conditions - as is the case, if the advantage does not
Rich goes for these passes - to maintain a registry (either own or
contract) is no use having the low entry ticket.
Hugs to all
----- Mensagem original -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome
Argentina presidency Internauta
Posted in: Quarta-Feira 28, 2011 23:04 Dezembro
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New
gTLDs
Alejandro and all: As I heard ad nauseam habrn much
you, I am not in favor of new gTLDs.
Grounds on which I base my position is that I am convinced that
this is just a few and that business is not profitable for most
Internet community (including SMEs and end users), we
spent a lot of money and time to discuss, write, theorize and
Asked about this, so few take advantage of it and one or two
search engine companies generate wealth from its massive utilizacin
once installed in the markets these NGTLD.
Ningn Todava found no citizen or company not engaged in
technology, which tells me that it was imperative to have this or that gTLDs
again, until you started with creating a field of marketing
need not truthful about this, now warm with fear quizs
using the flagship brand of your company as gTLDs, appearing estn
Some quizs wanting to see that it is able to capture this and
before anyone else, he deserves this name ... pear is far from a
"Need for users or businesses" and is very close to the
need a few, who see in this poqusimos potential ALGN
hidden or manifest in other cases large businesses.
To you do not pass the same? had another very different experience
you describe it? would be good to know ...
On the other hand, I understand that I (we) respect everything done by
the two ALAC member of the region that preceded me and the work of
ALAC on the subject well validebates, time and effort on this.
Despus to express what I think I am suffering more than reasonable doubt
on the document of ALAC and to vote, is one of the quizs
few times that I am in doubt about what to do and the truth is that
would be good to hear other voices on this, someone else quizs
opine on what it says ALAC and the debate that is taking place in
Right now, it would be good also a view favored one of the ALAC Member
above who were involved in the issue NGtld.
For now I feel I should abstain.
The 29 to vote, missing hours for this.
Best Regards
*
Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta Argentina Association President
Argentina Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> -CTA-
<http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> Federacin fluid Latin American Users
Internet <http://www.fuilain.org> ICANN / LACRALO - ALAC Member
facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk:
salinasporto ... Skype: Mobi internautaargentina: +54 215 819 9223 5
*
*
"Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that
humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "-Edward
Galeano
*
On 12/27/2011 6:23 a.m., Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch escribitbNL> > José, todos,
>
> retomo el tema del voto sobre el borrador de llamado de ALAC en relación
>
> Es de importancia leer los comentarios que otros han vertido en la página
draft, https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advi
gTLDs ce + on +% 29 +% 28DRAFT with contributions from people like Avri Doria.
>
> El contexto actual más amplio viene dado por las voces fundamentalmente de
radically the agreements reached so far and then substantially
ms slow the entry of new gTLDs. The New York Times editorializes
and talks about a pilot.
>
> Si ven las contribuciones de colegas como Bret Fausett y otros, en Twitter
You can reach the conclusin that voting in favor of the draft ALAC
is to deny the history of our organizations for participation in the long
gTLDs opening process. Those who have had huge reserves, who
have opposed full, and those who have driven have had all
opportunities to shape and propose, in particular, more income
gTLDs gradual than that envisaged in the program starting at 15 or
20 das.
>
> Pienso por ello que hay que tener argumentos muy claros para hacer un
progress.The can be but should be our arguments, imbued with the
long history.
>
> ¿Los hay? ¿Cuáles son? ¿Quiénes los expresan?
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
> Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732
>
> *Mi blog/My blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> *LinkedIn profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> *Unete al grupo UNAM en
> *Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico,http://www.isoc.org
> Participa en ICANN,http://www.icann.org
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
> ________________________________________
> Desde:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Arce [josefranciscoarce at gmail.com]
> Enviado el: jueves, 22 de diciembre de 2011 15:21
> Hasta: Natalia Enciso
> CC: LACRALO Español
> Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the
>
> *Estimados*:
> La unica herramienta actual que permite la mejor
> comunicacion en los dos idiomas es la lista de LACRALO, por tener
> traduccion instantanea (con sus aciertos y ....). Pero queda abierto el
> dialogo para propuestas nuevas como la de Sergio para que debatamos si son
> mejores o no. Mientras tanto y como no queda mucho tiempo para este tema
> usemos la lista.
>
> Saludos
>
> José Arce.-
>
>
> 2011/12/21 Natalia Enciso<natalia.enciso at gmail.com>
>
>> Buenos días:
>>
>> En la llamada mensual de ALAC del día de ayer se pidió que se discuta en
>> cada RALO sobre el ALAC STATEMENT ON THE NEW GTLDS.
>>
>> Habrá una llamada de ALAC el 6 de enero de 2012 donde se tratará el tema.
>>
>> En la lista se estuvo discutiendo sobre el tema, especificamente sobre
>> "interés público".
>> Sería bueno que se genere un debate en la lista para poder llevar la
>> opinion de LACRALO a esa llamada.
>>
>> Saludos,
>>
>> Natalia
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>> Date: 2011/12/20
>> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs
>> To:"alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <
>> alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>> Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has requested that the
>> Message be Sent to the ALAC Announce mailing list:
>>
>>
>> Further to today's ALAC call < https://community.icann.org/x/AQrPAQ>,
>> Evan Leibovitch present motion for an ALAC Statement on the New
gTLDs,
>> I Encourage you to read-through <
>>
>>
https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advice+on+gTL
Ds
>> The Statement < https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ>
Within
>> Your regional lists.
>>
>>
>> Additional Information about the Statement Can be found on the Updated
ALAC
>> Advice on gTLDs Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ>.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and
Nathalie
>> Peregrine
>> ICANN At-Large Staff
>> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC-Announce mailing list
>> ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Natalia.enciso @ gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> Lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>>
>> Http://www.lacralo.org
>>
>
> --
> Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco
> + 54 9 351 6788920
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e16b24fa1d.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list