[lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections

[Jacqueline Morris]

Fight? Not at all. Just into process, procedure and rules. As a legal
practitioner, I think you should appove.

On 28/07/2011, carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Jacqueline:  I can see you loves to fight. I particularly prefer before
> hits, talk a lot till achive a unified conclusion. I think my words were
> very clear. If nobody appear at the adecuate moment, lost the possibility to
> argue after the consumate facts. After postulation period, was only a
> candidate. So, that meant : An enormous silent agreement, or notional
> agreement by consensus.
> We no need extend more this discussion, now became abstract. All the best x
> u.
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
> former ALAC member by LACRALO
> Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:36:57 -0400
>> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections
>> From: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
>> To: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com
>> CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> Consensus without a quorum? That is really uncommon common sense. I
>> grew up knowing that if there is no quorum, there is no activity that
>> is official coming from that non-quorate "meeting". Therefore, how can
>> there be consensus if there wasn't a quorate meeting? A connsensus of
>> 4? when quorum is double that?
>> Besides, I didn't see a call for a VOTE, I saw an online POLL to
>> confirm the consensus. (Similar as counting hands in a room, or having
>> the members in f2f say AYE or NO. (Which brings us to acclamation)
>> Maybe there's a problem with the translation because poll and vote are
>> two very different things in English.
>>
>> Jacqueline A. Morris
>> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
>> Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, carlos dionisio aguirre
>> <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear Jacqueline. The consensus was the silence. The no other candidate
>> > proposal. The lack of oposition. And as Jose said is really a stupid
>> > thing call to vote one candidate. My two cents. And common sense please.
>> > Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry®
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Jacqueline Morris <jam at jacquelinemorris.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:35:12
>> > To: <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections
>> >
>> > Jose
>> >  We have one candidate with approval from 4 of 36 ALSes, I don't see
>> >  how 1/9th can be consensus. I'd think that if I were the candidate in
>> >  this position, I'd like ALL the ALSes that support me to so say, and
>> >  hence I am both officially and ethically approved. 4 out of 36 is kind
>> >  of a big minority, not so?
>> >  Just my $0.03.
>> >
>> >  Jacqueline A. Morris
>> >  Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
>> >  Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
>> >
>> >
>  		 	   		

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free.
(after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )