[lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections

carlos dionisio aguirre carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 28 20:16:25 UTC 2011



Dear Jacqueline:  I can see you loves to fight. I particularly prefer before hits, talk a lot till achive a unified conclusion. I think my words were very clear. If nobody appear at the adecuate moment, lost the possibility to argue after the consumate facts. After postulation period, was only a candidate. So, that meant : An enormous silent agreement, or notional agreement by consensus.
We no need extend more this discussion, now became abstract. All the best x u.
Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
former ALAC member by LACRALO
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org 


> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:36:57 -0400
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections
> From: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
> To: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com
> CC: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> Consensus without a quorum? That is really uncommon common sense. I
> grew up knowing that if there is no quorum, there is no activity that
> is official coming from that non-quorate "meeting". Therefore, how can
> there be consensus if there wasn't a quorate meeting? A connsensus of
> 4? when quorum is double that?
> Besides, I didn't see a call for a VOTE, I saw an online POLL to
> confirm the consensus. (Similar as counting hands in a room, or having
> the members in f2f say AYE or NO. (Which brings us to acclamation)
> Maybe there's a problem with the translation because poll and vote are
> two very different things in English.
> 
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
> Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, carlos dionisio aguirre
> <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Jacqueline. The consensus was the silence. The no other candidate proposal. The lack of oposition. And as Jose said is really a stupid thing call to vote one candidate. My two cents. And common sense please.
> > Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry®
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jacqueline Morris <jam at jacquelinemorris.com>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:35:12
> > To: <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections
> >
> > Jose
> >  We have one candidate with approval from 4 of 36 ALSes, I don't see
> >  how 1/9th can be consensus. I'd think that if I were the candidate in
> >  this position, I'd like ALL the ALSes that support me to so say, and
> >  hence I am both officially and ethically approved. 4 out of 36 is kind
> >  of a big minority, not so?
> >  Just my $0.03.
> >
> >  Jacqueline A. Morris
> >  Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
> >  Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
> >
> >
 		 	   		  


More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list