[lac-discuss-en] RES: LACRALO and Elections
cveraq at gmail.com
cveraq at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 19:31:11 UTC 2011
[[--Translated text (es -> es)--]]
Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO and Elections
From: cveraq at gmail.com
This is what I said and did. Q You vote and I hope we do! The result is already known ... Let the process and now!
Carlos VQ
Message Sent from my BlackBerry ® Claro terminal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vanda UOL" <vanda at uol.com.br>
Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Date: Thu, July 28, 2011 16:05:29
To: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO and Elections
Friends, we follow the process and stop the time spent with
these debates. There process we follow. It was exactly this spending
embazó while my proposal not to hold elections now.
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
IT Trend
Alameda Santos 1470 to 1407.8
01418-903 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Tel + 5511 3266.6253
Mob + 55118181.1464
----- Mensagem original -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome
jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Posted in: fifth-feira, 28 Julho 2011 13:38
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Cc: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] LACRALO and Elections
[[- Translated text (in -> is )--]]
Subject: Re: LACRALO and Elections
From: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Consensus, without a quorum? That's really uncommon common sense. I
I grew up knowing that if there is no quorum, no activity is
official quorum is not "meeting". Therefore, how
can no consensus unless a quorum at a meeting? A connsensus 4?
when a quorum is double?
Also, I did not see a vote, I saw a survey to
confirm the consensus. (Similar as counting hands in a
room, or have F2F members say yes or no. (Which leads to the
acclamation) may have a problem with the translation, since the survey
and the vote was two very different things in English.
Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: ubiquitous, necessary, and Invisible
Free. (After Chris Lehmann)
Thu, July 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
<carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Jacqueline. The consensus was silence. The proposal of any
another candidate. The lack of opposition. And, as Joseph is actually a
called stupid to vote for a candidate. My two cents. And the sense
common please.
> Sent from my BlackBerry ® wireless device
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jacqueline Morris <jam at jacquelinemorris.com>
> Date: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 7:35:12
> A: <lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] LACRALO and Elections
>
> Josà ©
> We have a candidate with the approval of 36 n 4 ALS, I see 1/9th
> How can consensus. I think if I were the candidate
> n this position, I'd like all ALS helps me to say,
> and therefore, I am both officially approved
> à © matically. 4 out of 36 is kind of a big minorÃa not handle?
> Sà ³ as my $ 0.03.
>
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> The technology should be like oxygen: ubiquitous, necessary,
> Invisible and free. (After © s that Chris Lehmann)
>
>
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/958523d86e.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list