[lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? RES = 3A__Resultados_de_la_reuni? =? Utf-8? Q? = EF = BF = BDn_de_LACRALO_el_22_de_junio_de_2011_en_Singapur? =
Jacqueline Morris
jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Wed Jul 20 23:10:59 UTC 2011
Sylvia & Sergio
I do not understand your problem - there's a meeting being called with
2 agenda items. Why should the Secretariat not remind people that they
should think carefully about the issues to be discussed BEFORE the
meeting? What "institutional mechanism" would this break? I would hope
that the LACRALO institutional mechanisms would include each ALS
discussing the agenda issues in advance of the meeting, so as to
prepare to have a productive meeting. The note about the translation
is, in my opinion, a good one as we can then get professional
translation done, so that communication is enhanced.
Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:56 PM, <sylvia at prontocl.com.br> wrote:
>
> [[--Translated text (es -> es)--]]
>
> Subject: =? Utf-8? Q? RES = 3A__Resultados_de_la_reuni? =? Utf-8? Q? = EF = BF = BDn_de_LACRALO_el_22_de_junio_de_2011_en_Singapur? =
> From: sylvia at prontocl.com.br
>
> Dear Dev:
> Actually I have to agree with Sergio we implement institutional mechanisms before taking deciciones.
> As I mentioned © privately before his announcement, I think the Region is all you should say No to have a third Reunion for the day 28.
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> ----- Mensagem original -----
> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Internauta Argentina presidency
> Posted in: mia © Wednesday, July 20, 2011 15:23
> To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Results reuniï LACRALO ¿½ n the June 22, 2011 in Singapore
>
>
> Dear Dev: I suggest that if you are going to do something about the so-called "diversity issues" is after © s of the Meeting and to be the same attending the meeting n who define whether it is worth discussing this or not.
> You can not solve by itself, whether to deliver positions, whether to discuss and the date and time of delivery of these.
> I suggest you raise this in the meeting and if we all agreed to discuss this put in place the institutional mechanisms.
> I invite you to work in institutional form, our thin you can not skip any public formal step when it comes to debate and discuss positions.
> I greet you attn.
>
>
> * President Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta n Argentina Argentina Association of Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> Fluid
> No Latin American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilain.org> LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ...
> Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 *
>
>
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list