[lac-discuss-en] =?windows-1252?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_E = =?windows-1252?q?N_ALAC =

apisan at servidor.unam.mx apisan at servidor.unam.mx
Thu Apr 14 16:24:55 UTC 2011


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_E = =?windows-1252?q?N_ALAC =
From: apisan at servidor.unam.mx

Carlos, 
 
thanks not to save an opportunity to me to follow the subject  
in detail by my own means. 
 
Now I have almost absolute certainty of being able to affirm the following thing: 
 
The ALAC manifesto sobrela overhaul mandataada by the AoC on  
stability, security and robustness of the DNS already were published by ALAC without  
to have counted opportunely with the LACRALO vote. 
 
It covers tens with spas and subsubjects of importance for the users, and already  
as much it is published, as I mentioned it, like in being abledel SSR-RT or  
Stability, Security, and Resilience of the DNS Review Team, along with  
of the Buisness Constituency, the International to hamber of Commerce,  
Registrars, and some experts. 
 
That is to say, if indeed I do not have myself lost, the discussion onif DNSSEC  
it must be obligatory but gratuitous or to cualuqier another variant it has been  
obsolecida course to the irrelevancia. 
 
Good, but by the meno this time somebody yes leypó what we were  
having to have discussed. 
 
As I already mentioned it before, I have distinci´´on to preside over the SSR-RT; no  
I can prejuzagar which will be the reading of the rest of the RT but without a doubt no  
it will enter details about whom it voted and quíen no; simnplemente I anticipate  
that it is considered like the ALAC position. 
 
I recommend its reading. 
 
Alexander Pisanty 
 
 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
      Dr Alexander Pisanty 
UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 
 
Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 
 
* My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
* LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
* Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
* Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 
 
* They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org 
* It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
 
 
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: 
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:53:07 +0000 > From: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq at gmail.com> > To: Alexander Pisanty <apisan at servidor.unam.mx> > Cc: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar, lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: > =?Windows-1252?B?UmU6IFtsYWMtZGlzY3Vzcy1lc10JVEVNQVMgUFJPUFVFU1RPUyBBIFZPV > EFDSdNOIEVOIEFMQUM = = >  > the interchange this equal few hours above, and if already Iam finished the process now is necessary to turn around to the result and its consequences. > > Carlos > -----Original Message > From: Alexander Pisanty <apisan at servidor.unam.mx> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:46:59 > To: Carlos Quintana Side<cveraq at gmail.com> > Cc: <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING E > N ALAC > > Carlos, colleagues, > > to see if enteindo: > > we are condiconando all the vote on the SSR-RT [ that I preside over, for that reason > only busoc the explanation ] to the situati!
 on of which the services of DNSSEC > is onerous or gratuitous? and it, on a consultation that closed yesterday? > > will thank for the clarity. This way, but I excuses pedirl adee > encounter of trip in a country in which not all the servicesof Internet > is available, which as well forces to accede of ways that > acambio to open some obstructs all. One becomes specially > complicated the retrospective tracking of these conversations. > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > * Participates in ICANN, ht!
 tp://www.icann.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !
 . . . . 
. > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > &gt; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:57:23 +0000 > &gt; From: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq at gmail.com> > &gt; To: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar > &gt; Cc: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > &gt; Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ Windows-1252 ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN > &gt; ALAC > &gt; > &gt; Dear friend and colleagues: > &gt; > &gt; soon does not have but options of being IF conditional for several reasons but the main one is that > &gt; > &gt; 1. There are interests in game that with did not remain quiet. IF ademas is a business so that it moves single > &gt; > &gt; IF for the same reasons has less probability of being restricted. > &gt; > &gt; votaria I NOT and who move to IF conditional by logica. > &gt; > &gt; Carlos > &gt; -----Original Message > &gt; From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia at internauta.org.ar> > &gt; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:55:42 > &gt; To: <cveraq at gmail.com> > &gt; Reply-!
 To: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar > &gt; Cc: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > &gt; Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es]TEMAS PROPOSED To VOTACIÓ > &gt; N IN ALAC > &gt; > &gt; Carlos I agree with vos in your glance but I believe thatthe vote would have of > &gt; to be "IF" and to put some contributions in the "field observations" so that > &gt; can consider in the future and looking for the way that that cost > &gt; in certain cases (as vos good you describe them) is assimilated by > &gt; company and not by the user. > &gt; an affectionate greeting! > &gt; > &gt; * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association > &gt; Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > &gt; Latin American Federation of Users of Internet > &gt; <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > &gt; twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > &gt; Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > &gt; > &gt;!
  * > &gt; > &gt; "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whene!
 ver we r
eceived orders that > &gt; humiliates our conscience or violates our common sense "-Eduardo > &gt; Galeano- > &gt; > &gt; * > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; the 13/04/2011 10:35 a.m., Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > &gt; &gt; Acabe buying several dominions and the recorder offers DNSSEC like option with cost. Nonmemory now the value but that me desestimulo. > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; deberia to vow NOT because the cost is a tie for the expansion of normal users. Soon debera trrabajar a serrie of norms to return obligatory in some cases DNSSEC for example command post institutions or companies financial, that receive payments, governmental, etc > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; the same norm deberia to contemplate the nonobligation for example in case of redireccionamientos to dominions that already have DNSSEC > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; Carlos Side > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; -----Original Message > &gt; &gt; From: "Alberto Grove"<asoto at ibero-americano.org> > &gt; &gt; Sender: lac-discuss-it is -!
 bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > &gt; &gt; Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:25:32 > &gt; &gt; To:<presidencia at internauta.org.ar>;<lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > &gt; &gt; Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] > &gt; &gt; PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN > &gt; &gt; ALAC > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; Sergio, just I am getting up myself after long time andin some > &gt; &gt; things I will take in putting me to the day. It would seem that you do not agree so in > &gt; &gt; obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC, but in a recommendation of "very > &gt; &gt; advisable "or of" better practices ". It seems reasonable so that there are costs > &gt; &gt; associated that single would have to be assumed in certain conditions. > &gt; &gt; can vote IF with that observation? Or for that reason it would have to vow no? > &gt; &gt; warm Greetings > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; Alberto Grove > &gt; &gt; IIISI > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; original -----Mensaje > &gt; &gt; Of: lac-discuss-it is -bou!
 nces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > &gt; &gt; [ mailto:lac-discuss-!
 is -boun
ces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of > &gt; &gt; presidency Argentina Internaut > &gt; &gt; Sent: Wednesday, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. > &gt; &gt; For: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > &gt; &gt; Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTINGIN ALAC > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; Dear companions of the LACRALO: > &gt; &gt; Hay two subjects that have been sent to voting in ALAC: > &gt; &gt; * 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilienceof the > &gt; &gt; DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC Declaration on the stability, > &gt; &gt; security and capacity of recovery of the Equipment of Overhaul of DNS > &gt; &gt; (SSR-Team) - * Overcomes day 15 of April - * > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > &gt; &gt; I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF".* > &gt; &gt; I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow > &gt; &gt; the line that exp!
 osed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC > &gt; &gt; (https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit > &gt; &gt; y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse > &gt; &gt; dCommentId=13861602&#comment-13861602) > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; * > &gt; &gt; 2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC on Scope of Work and > &gt; &gt; Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise - April > &gt; &gt; 2011- Declaration of ALAC of the equipment of overhaul WHOIS RFC in the scope > &gt; &gt; of work and plan of work, Outreach and the plan of action for > &gt; &gt; exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomes the 16 of April > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; * If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > &gt; &gt; I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF".* > &gt; &gt; For that they want to read something on this can enter a: > &gt; &gt; https://community.icann.org/displa!
 y/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev > &gt; &gt; iew+Tea!
 m%27s+RF
C+on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f > &gt; &gt; or+Whois+Review+Exercise+-+April+2011 > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; Whose relator was our companion of THIN Carlton Samuels. > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; Sugiero takes a reading of the document at issue, sinceit is very > &gt; &gt; rich and interesting the made declaration. > &gt; &gt; Also I believe that in this it could contribute to something Carlton like stops > &gt; &gt; to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of > &gt; &gt; intreach (if it is possible and it has time) > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline > &gt; &gt; to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not our work, no > &gt; &gt; attempt to argue on this, but if I must at least mark one > &gt; &gt; position on the same one, since I have assumed I have sent most of > &gt; &gt; the subjects that have been put in voting, and single on two ocassions no > &gt; &gt; I have!
  voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and second > &gt; &gt; by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless seems thatwe demanded what > &gt; &gt; in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badlyno > &gt; &gt; memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair and vice > &gt; &gt; to chair (one was jacqueline and other Jose Ovid)... perhaps he would have > &gt; &gt; to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generateparticipation > &gt; &gt; and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin America and theCaribbean > &gt; &gt; we thought... can be that we are with a surprise... > &gt; &gt; warm Greetings > &gt; > &gt; _______________________________________________ > &gt; lac-discuss-is mailing list > &gt; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > &gt; https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > &gt; > &gt; http://www.lacralo.org > &gt; > 
 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/72441969cd.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list