[lac-discuss-en] =?windows-1252?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_E = =?windows-1252?q?N_ALAC =
cveraq at gmail.com
cveraq at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 15:11:11 UTC 2011
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_E = =?windows-1252?q?N_ALAC =
From: cveraq at gmail.com
Clear.
If conditional it is for example which it is obligatory for banks, cards of credito, government, etc
In cases that a main dominion assured east the dominions that are redireccionamientos it is not obligatory.
The parqueados dominions either
And asi.. Many cases are analyzed and clear norm settles down that it allows to know when and when DNSSEC is not obligatory.
ALWAYS it means to desestimular the growth and it affected mainly to pequenos users and of regions where the costs are a determining factor. Already this there the decadas case of the electronica company/signature with of qualified but not applied universally, I enter others, by subject cost
Carlos
-----Original Message
From: Andrés Piazza <andrespiazza at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:59:55
To: <cveraq at gmail.com>
Cc: <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN
ALAC
Carlos, interesting your point of view.
You can extend that idea IF Conditional applicable to the case?
Greetings,
Andrés
The 14 of April of 2011 11:57, Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq at gmail.com>he wrote:
> Dear friend and colleagues: > > soon does not have but options of being IF conditional for several reasons > but the main one is that > > 1. There are interests in game that with did not remain quiet. IF > ademas is a business so that it moves single > > IF for the same reasons has less probability of being restricted. > > votaria I NOT and who move to IF conditional by logica. > > Carlos > -----Original Message > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia at internauta.org.ar> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:55:42 > To: <cveraq at gmail.com> > Reply-To: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar > Cc: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es]TEMAS PROPOSED To VOTACIÓ > N IN ALAC > > Carlos I agree with vos in your glance but I believe that the vote would have of > to be "IF" and to put some contributions in the "field observations" so that > can consider in the future and looking for the way that thatcost > in certain cases (as vos good you describe th!
em) is assimilated by > company and not by the user. > an affectionate greeting! > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > Latin American Federation of Users of Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > * > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we receivedorders that > humiliates our conscience or violates our common sense "- Eduardo > Galeano- > > * > > > the 13/04/2011 10:35 a.m., Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > Acabe buying several dominions and the recorder offers DNSSEC like > option with cost. Nonmemory now the value but that me desestimulo. > > > > deberia to vow NOT because the cost is a tie for the expansion of > usuary normal. Soon debera trrabajar a serrie of norms to return > obligatory !
in some cases DNSSEC for example command post institutions or !
companie
s > financiers, who receive payments, governmental, etc > > > > the same norm deberia to contemplate the nonobligation forexample in case of > redireccionamientos to dominions that already have DNSSEC > > > > Carlos Side > > > > > > -----Original Message > > From: "Alberto Grove"<asoto at ibero-americano.org> > > Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:25:32 > > To:<presidencia at internauta.org.ar>;< > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] > > PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN > > ALAC > > > > Sergio, just I am getting up myself after long time and insome > > things I will take in putting me to the day. It would seemthat you do not agree so in > > > obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC, but in a recommendation of "very > > advisable "or of" better practices ". It seems reasonableso that there is > costs > > associated !
that single would have to be assumed in certain conditions. > > can vote IF with that observation? Or for that reason it would have to vow no? > > warm Greetings > > > > Alberto Grove > > IIISI > > > > original -----Mensaje > > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of > > presidency Argentina Internaut > > Sent: Wednesday, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. > > For: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN ALAC > > > > Dear companions of the LACRALO: > > Hay two subjects that have been sent to voting in ALAC: > > * 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilience of the > > DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC Declaration on the stability, > > security and capacity of recovery of the Equipment of Overhaul of DNS > > (SSR-Team) - * Overcomes day 15 of April - * >!
> > > If it does not have nobody is against or has a di!
fferent
point of view that > > I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF". * > > I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow > > the line that exposed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC > > ( > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit > > > y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse > > dCommentId=13861602&#comment-13861602) > > > > * > > 2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC on Scope of Work and > > Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise - April > > 2011- Declaration of ALAC of the equipment of overhaul WHOIS RFC in the scope > > of work and plan of work, Outreach and the plan of actionfor > > exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomes the16 of April > > > > * If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > I make change my position would like to!
vote by * "IF". * > > For that they want to read something on this can enter a: > > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev > > > iew+Team%27s+RFC+on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f > > or+Whois+Review+Exercise+-+April+2011 > > > > Whose relator was our companion of THIN Carlton Samuels. > > > > Sugiero takes a reading of the document at issue, since it is very > > rich and interesting the made declaration. > > Also I believe that in this it could contribute to something Carlton like stops > > to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of > > intreach (if it is possible and it has time) > > > > to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline > > to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not our work, no > > attempt to argue on this, but if I must at least mark one > > position on the same one, since I have assume!
d I have sent most of > > the subjects that have been put i!
n voting
, and single on two ocassions no > > I have voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and second > > by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless seems that we demanded what > > in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badly no > > memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair and vice > > to chair (one was jacqueline and other Jose Ovid)... perhaps he would have > > to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generate participation > > and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin America and the Caribbean > > we thought... can be that we are with a surprise... > > warm Greetings > >_______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org >
--
* Andrés Piazza *
www.andrespiazza.com
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2ba636c6b7.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list