[lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_EN _ = =?iso-8859-1?q?ALAC =

Thu Apr 14 13:52:45 UTC 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_EN _ = =?iso-8859-1?q?ALAC =
From: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar

Hello welcome Alberto on board! 
What I think is that there would be to anticipate the form in which this does not hit  
in the cost of the dominion nor in the companies of negative form. 
I believe that in some cases it is justified and in others not the subject of  
DNSSEC obligatory nature. 
Single, we will be able to vote affirmatively, negatively or abstaining us a  
to weigh of which one can leave seated a commentary. 
Warm greetings 

* Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association  
Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI-  
Latin American federation of Users of Internet  
<http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto  
twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto...  
Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * 

* 

"Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we received orders that  
they humiliate our conscience or they violate our common sense"- Eduardo  
Galeano- 

* 

The 13/04/2011 10:25 a.m., Alberto Grove wrote: > Sergio, just I am getting up myself after long time and in some > things I will take in putting me to the day. It would seem that you do not agree so in > obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC, but ina recommendation of "very > advisable "or of" better practices ". It seems reasonable sothat there are costs > associated that single would have to be assumed in certain conditions. > can vote IF with that observation? Or for that reason it would have to vow no? > warm Greetings > > Alberto Grove > IIISI > > original -----Mensaje > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of > presidency Argentina Internaut > Envoy: Wednesday, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. > For: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN ALAC > > Dear companions of the LACRALO: > Hay two subjects that have be!
 en sent to voting in ALAC: > * 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilience of the > DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC Declaration on the stability, > security and capacity of recovery of the Equipment of Overhaul of DNS > (SSR-Team) - * Overcomes day 15 of April - * > > If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF". * > I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow > the line that exposed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC > (https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit > y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse > dCommentId=13861602&#comment-13861602) > > * > 2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC on Scope of Work and > Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise- April > 2011- Declaration of ALAC of the equipment of overhaul WHOISRFC in the sc!
 ope > of work and plan of work, Outreach and the plan of actio!
 n for > 
exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomes the 16of April > > * If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF". * > For that they want to read something on this can enter a: > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev > iew+Team%27s+RFC+on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f > or+Whois+Review+Exercise+-+April+2011 > > Whose relator was our companion of THIN Carlton Samuels. > > Sugiero takes a reading of the document at issue, since it is very > rich and interesting the made declaration. > Also I believe that in this it could contribute to something Carltonlike stops > to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of > intreach (if it is possible and it has time) > > to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline > to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not our work, no > atte!
 mpt to argue on this, but if I must at least mark one > position on the same one, since I have assumed I have sent most of > the subjects that have been put in voting, and single on twoocassions no > I have voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and second > by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless seems that we demanded what > in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badly no > memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair andvice > to chair (one was jacqueline and other Jose Ovid)... perhapshe would have > to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generate participation > and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin America and the Caribbean > we thought... can be that we are with a surprise... > warm Greetings 
_______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b1e90de242.html
--]]