[lac-discuss-en] =?windows-1252?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_E = =?windows-1252?q?N_ALAC =

Wed Apr 13 13:36:30 UTC 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=D3N_E = =?windows-1252?q?N_ALAC =
From: cveraq at gmail.com

Finish buying several dominions and the recorder offers DNSSEC like option with cost. Nonmemory now the value but that me desestimulo. 

Deberia to vow NOT because the cost is a tie for the expansion of normal users. Soon debera trrabajar a serrie of norms to return obligatory in some cases DNSSEC for example command post institutions or companies financial, that receive payments, governmental, etc  

The same norm deberia to contemplate the nonobligation for example in case of redireccionamientos to dominions that already have DNSSEC 

Carlos Side 

-----Original Message 
From: "Alberto Grove" <asoto at ibero-americano.org> 
Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:25:32  
To: <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>; <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] 
 PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN  
 ALAC 

Sergio, just I am getting up myself after long time and in some 
things I will take in putting me to the day. It would seem that you do not agree so in 
obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC, but in arecommendation of "very 
advisable "or of" better practices ". It seems reasonable so that there are costs 
associated that single would have to be assumed in certain conditions. 
it can vote IF with that observation? Or for that reason it would have to vow no? 
Warm greetings 

Alberto Grove 
IIISI 

Original -----Mensaje 
Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
[ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of 
presidency Argentina Internaut 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. 
It stops: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN ALAC 

Dear companions of the LACRALO: 
There are two subjects that have been sent to voting in ALAC: 
* 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilience of the  
DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC Declaration on the stability,  
security and capacity of recovery of the Equipment of Overhaulof DNS  
(SSR-Team) - * It overcomes day 15 of April - * 

If there is nobody it opposes or it has a different point of view that  
I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF". * 
I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow  
the line that exposed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC   
(https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit 
y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse 
dCommentId=13861602&#comment-13861602)  

* 
2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC on Scope ofWork and  
Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise -April  
2011- Declaration of ALAC of the equipment of overhaul WHOIS RFC in the scope  
of work and plan of work, of Outreach and the plan of action for  
exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomes the 16 of April 

* If there is nobody it opposes or it has a different point ofview that  
I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF". * 
For that they want to read something on this can enter a: 
https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev 
iew+Team%27s+RFC+on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f 
or+Whois+Review+Exercise+-+April+2011 

Whose relator was our companion of THIN Carlton Samuels. 

I suggest takes a reading of the document at issue, since it is very  
rich and interesting the made declaration. 
Also I believe that in this it could contribute to something Carlton like stops  
to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of  
intreach (if it is possible and it has time) 

In order to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline  
to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not our work, no  
attempt to argue on this, but if I must at least mark one  
position on the same one, since I have assumed I have sent most of  
the subjects that have been put in voting, and single on two ocassions no  
I have voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and second  
by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless it seems that we demanded what  
in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badly no  
memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair and vice  
to chair (one was jacqueline and other Jose Ovid)... perhaps he would have  
to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generate participation  
and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin America and the Caribbean  
we thought... can be that we are with a surprise... 
Warm greetings 
--  

* Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association  
Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI-  
Latin American federation of Users of Internet  
<http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto  
twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto...  
Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * 

* 

"Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we received orders that  
they humiliate our conscience or they violate our common sense"- Eduardo  
Galeano- 

* 

_______________________________________________ 

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e791d73ab2.html
--]]