[lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?Votaci=F3n_Secretario_de_LACRALO =

Wed Apr 6 23:59:28 UTC 2011

Andres, could you please tell us how many ALSes you need to agree to bring
this vote to a close?

If the LACRALO ALSes agree this is a waste of our funds and that there is no
point to it, I see no problem in them expressing that the vote currently in
place be cancelled.

Thank you

Cintra Sooknanan

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:52 PM, <salgueiro.jo at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>
> Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?Votaci=F3n_Secretario_de_LACRALO =
> From: salgueiro.jo at gmail.com
>
> In that I am clear and is valid for both cases, the past and the present
> one.
> that I say is that as is ridiculous, we try to correct it for the future
> and if
> it fits, to impose a penalty.
>
> I insist on which at this moment the only possible sanction for that us
> it lead to this situation is of moral character
>
>
> JOS
>
>
>
>
> Original -----Mensaje
> Of: Andrés Piazza [ mailto:andrespiazza at gmail.com ]
> Sent: Wednesday, 06 of April of 2011 06:37 p.m.
> It stops: Jose Ovid Salgueiro; Spanish LACRALO
> Subject: Re: Voting Secretary of LACRALO
>
> Jose:
>
> Creeme that stops my was enough desanimante to have to dedicate hours a
> this process, since I did it. But via is no institutional other
> in order to come different from this, there are deliberate andus parecio
> but
> appropriate that to end up suspending a voting...
>
> Recorda that when we chose the Representative to ALAC in 2008,Carlos
> he was the unico candidate and we had to vote. In that occasion he was a
> little
> different, since a ALS pidio that the voting is made when
> the unico candidate was always Carlos. In this case one retires and
> it leaves us in the same situation.
>
> It can sound ridiculo somewhat, but it is the option that we have leftof
> Agreement to the Rules of Procedure.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andrés
>
> The 06/04/11, Jose Ovid Salgueiro <salgueiro.jo at gmail.com> he wrote: >
> seems unusual to Me that it must follow a voting with a single one >
> candidate. He is totally ridiculous and this discredits to ours
> institution. > > Entiendo that it is not possible to be sanctioned to
> Antonioto retire once
> begun > the voting process since the possible sanction was not established
> in > forms previous, but I believe that of this experience it is due to
> learn and to take
> > corrective necessary so that this situation does not become to
> present/display. > We must incorporate an exemplary sanction in our
> statutes. > > the possible sanction could not be but that moral. > > In
> addition to the time of the members of the LACRALO to have to avoid votes in
> > a selection of a single candidate, has been incurred expenses when
> organizing
> > voting process that ends up being unnecessary. > > > > JOS > > > >
> original -----Mensaje > Of: lac-discuss-it is -
> bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -
> bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of
> Andrés > Piazza > Envoy: Wednesday, 06 of April of 2011 04:16 p.m. > For:
> Spanish LACRALO > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Secretary of LACRALO >
> > (English Official Version in a separated email) > > Dear Miembros of
> LACRALO > > As I communicated to them in the Teleconferencing of the Dayof
> Yesterday, the process
> of > voting online to choose the Secretary of LACRALO began the day Monday
> 28 > of March of 2011 with 2 candidates: > > * the acual secretary, Dev
> Anand Teelucksingh de Trinidad and Tobago
> Computer > Society (TTCS) > * Antonio Medina Gomez of Colombian Association
> of Users of Internet > (ACUI)i > > day 23 of March of 2011, Antonio Medina
> Gomez accepted its nomination > - autonominación- and day 31 of March
> notified the retirement of its candidacy > for Secretary of LACRALO, leaving
> only a candidate for the position of > Secretary of LACRALO. > > Since the
> vote already had begun, an overhaul of documents of > LACRALO organization
> was made to determine the most appropriate form
> of > to continue with the following steps: > (
> https://community.icann.org/x/Oo0i) > > In the interest to maintain the
> integrity of this election process, > selection of the Secretary will
> continue. > > Since there is sólamente a candidate, the voters can
> choosebetween that > only candidate: > > - Dev Anand Teelucksingh from
> Trinidad de Tobago Computer Society (TTCS) > > Or by the abstention. > >
> Since LACRALO is taking ahead a General Assembly Virtual stops > this
> selection (meaning that all 3ÃLSs in LACRALO is
> presents > and voting), by Rule 12,2 and 19 of the Rules of Procedure of >
> LACRALO, at least 19 ALSes MUST vote by the only candidate so that > results
> can be mentioned (ALSs that vote by abstention willbe > considered for this
> respect as if they had not voted). > > Since there were deliberations to
> make this decision, the date limit of
> > selection for the Secretary of LACRALO has been extended toTuesday 12 of
> > April 2011 to the 23:59 emitted UTC and the 7 votes will beerased until >
> moment, being sent again the credentials to the delegates of each
> ALS > so that they emit his vote again. > > Warm Greetings, > > Andrés
> Piazza > President of LACRALO > > -- > * Andrés Piazza * >
> www.andrespiazza.com > _______________________________________________ >
> lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org >
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > >
> http://www.lacralo.org > >
>
> --
> Envoy from my movable device
>
> * Andrés Piazza *
> www.andrespiazza.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3973046370.html
> --]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>