[lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed letter Proposal of ALAC JAS
carlos dionisio aguirre
carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 3 13:28:33 UTC 2011
Dear All: following my previous email, I strongly recommend take part on the Policy Update webinar today, there are two sessions, one running right now and other at 20 UTC.
I consider would be good to participate, specially for our ALAC representatives.
Best Regards
Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
former ALAC member by LACRALO
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org
> From: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com
> To: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:03:03 +0000
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed letter Proposal of ALAC JAS
>
>
> Dear All:
>
> Regarding New Constituencies in GNSO, this is part of GNSO Improvements http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ and invite our representatives in ALAC to read.
> To understand the process I invite also to read doccuments -The New contituency Process - at http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm , after to read and understand those doccuments, I`m sure you will be capable to decide in order to fill your responsabilities.
> My particular point of view is that: I`m in favor to new constituencies, but not completely sure in all cases. for instance I support the Consumers Constituency.
> I`m not completely sure in case of Not for profit Constituency, in this case I have doubts regarding the difference among CC, NFPC, NCSG, NCUC ( I know that could be a proper lack of knowledge by me). And finally I`m almost sure against other constituencies wich have presented their petitions.
>
> My two cents.
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
> former ALAC member by LACRALO
> Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:45:07 +0000
> From: presidencia at internauta.org.ar
> To: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> CC:
> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed letter Proposal of ALAC JAS
>
>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>
> Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed letter Proposal of ALAC JAS
> From: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar
>
> As he indicates it well Carlos in his mail was one of both representing
> of the LACRALO that could not vote on the proposal of ALAC JAS.
>
> That representative I was.
>
> The reason by which I have not been able to vote is the breakage of myHD in my PC
> which I disable to emit my vote, I ask excuses all you by
> this, but doubtlessly without computer was impossible to me to do it.
>
> I must indicate that it was going it to do affirmatively, as expressedit in
> my mail when I sent the warning of consultation in the list on this subject
> made the 01/03, lamentably it was not the contribution of our ex- ones
> representative, who of insurance had been very enriching for all.
>
> As encouraging case I must indicate that, yes it was the valuable contribution of
> other members of the region that worried to answer the mail and
> to contribute to its points of view and knowledge for the decision making,
> those points of view had agreed with our intention of vote.
>
> It wanted to take advantage of this mail to ask to him Carlos who offers his us
> point of view on the processes of recognition of the new GNSO
> constituency, since day 04/03/2011 the term is overcome to vote.
>
> Also I would like to listen what the other members of ours think
> region, as as it is custom in this management will be taken in
> it counts at the time of defining our vote in the processes ofvoting of
> the subjects that are discussed in ALAC, for it shipment a connection that can
> to be a guide on the subject:
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Process+for+Recognition+of+New+GNSO+Constituencies
>
> Warm greetings
>
> * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association
> Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI-
> Latin American federation of Users of Internet
> <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto
> twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto...
> Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 *
>
>
> The 02/03/2011 12:39 p.m., carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com wrote: > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed letter Proposal ofALAC JAS > Of: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com > > > Wanted All: I`ve finishes seeing the email down, and my surprise was very great, because: 1 of 2 which our ALAC chose regionalrepresentatives, NO deciding participates in the survey. It wanted to know why? what on you? which was motivacióna to decide? after he asksabout ours maximun of the opinion when there are three members of LACRALO in the WG (a Co-chair), and he looks like me that all deserve our aid (even being I one of them). > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Advice of NCA GNSO - ICANN > previous member of ALAC of LACRALO > In Right of the Businesses of Lawyer - of Specialist > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > date: Wed, the 2 Of March 2011 09:55:11 Of +0100 > of: staff at atlarg!
> e.icann.org > a: alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: [ ALAC-Anuncie ] RESULT of the VOTE: Reviewed letter Proposalof ALAC JAS > > wanted all, > > with 11 outside 15 members of ALAC that vote in the recent votes in > proposed the reviewed letter of ALAC JAS, we can confirm that quorate is the results >. > > ********* > > you use the ratification of the reviewed letter proposal of ALAC JAS > > yes: 11 (100.00%) > Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Carlton Samuels, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra > Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch,James Seng, Sylvia Leite, Olivier > Crépin-Leblond, the Bashir, Dewandranath Kissoondoyal, Gareth De Mohammed > Shearman > > not: 0 (0.00%) > > abstains: 0 (0.00%) > > ***********> > you can verify the results independently underneath: > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1592gybVUyKuQsbcf9DLza2g > >we can confirm that the following members of ALAC did not participate!
> in > votación: > > Edmon Chungkin > Orujo Rote!
> nberg &g
> t; Tijani Horseradish tree Jemaa > Saline I carry De Sergio > > you you can underneath find the results of all the closed votes of ALAC: > https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 > > --> respect, > > Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, > Marilyn Vernon, Kristina Nordström > Personal En-Grande of ICANN >! > > email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org > Web site: www.atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________> ALAC-Anuncie the listthat envÃa > ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > Official Site En-Grande: http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11êb0a6f5.html > --]] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann!
> .org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19a716b172.html
> --]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list