[lac-discuss-en] HEAD OF CATTLE: Voting Director AT Large

[vanda at uol.com.br]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: HEAD OF CATTLE: Voting Director AT Large
From: vanda at uol.com.br

Nothing else to speak on both additional candidates. Non already is inside 
of the voting roll. I still hope, for the ALAC good, that 
winner de facto has conditions for participating in the Board. Be a person 
very balanced, with disposition for the work and knowledge 
excellent of all the subjects of ICANN. That she is also an able person 
to express its thoughts of form clear and to make friends between those of 
Staff and that is convincing in their principles in defesa of ALAC. 
An elect one which non counts on the appreciation of baord will be very desgastante 
for ALAC and a deservicio for our group. Those that they have 
responsibility to vote that infórmense best the possible thing to vote in favor 
of ALAC.  
Hugs to all  
Vanda Scartezini 
Pole Consulting Associados 
IT Trend 
Tree-lined avenue Holy 1470 - 1407,8 
01418-903 São Paulo, SP, Brazil 
Tel + 5511 3266.6253 
Mob + 55118181.1464 
 
 
-----Mensagem original 
Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
[ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post nome of 
Presidency Internaut 
Shipment command post: second-feira, 8 of novembro of 2010 22:43 
It stops: Jose Ovid Salgueiro A.; cveraq at gmail.com; ' Andrés Piazzá; 
lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Cc: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Assunto: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large 
 
Dear Jose Ovid: Your email has made me reflect on some subjects 
that I create they must of being high-priority at the time of entering to raise to us 
support to some person to enter to board by the users. 
 
I understand that to who we give our endorsement him it must of being a person with 
a fort loop with the end users of Internet. 
It must know in clearly that its function is to represent the users firmly 
and in freedom of action, with the only pressure of knowing itself responsible for 
to express opinions and positions that respect them point of view which they are spilled 
different the THIN ones. 
I am convinced that the work and the decisions that are taken in ALAC and in 
the THIN ones on the part of the users doubtlessly benefit to 
organization, I believe that to understand that what becomes for benefit of 
users are against ICANN, put in a place incomodo to us e very 
undesirable. 
 
I continue insisting like the first day that our organization entrancea 
ICANN, that I inhale to a cuatripartito and egalitarian Co-government (companies, 
academic users, sectors and governments), but I am not foolishand also me 
first passage seems important east that they are 
1 voice against 22 or 23, since the important thing of that voice is that it can modify 
some position, can contribute with a glance of "user" the diverse ones 
forms to see the "World of Internet", mainly the one of the Names and Numbers 
of Dominion, and also that can without doubt do that others toits side 
also they accompany that same position. 
 
I do not understand but that we are voting. 
It will be perhaps that we are voting the entrance of a person who is not going to have 
in account our vision, nor the necessities of the users? if itis thus it stops 
that we would vote it? 
We would be in that line of thought choosing to our twig? 
 
On the other hand I ask myself on this interchange of mails that is had 
happened in the list.  
There was no sufficient time so that are possible to be presented/displayed the candidates, No 
there was also a commission that I evaluate to those who appeared? 
It is good for the institucionalidad of ICANN that these three candidates 
present/display untimely and by outside the evaluation commission? (I create 
to understand that thus it was but is thus I request excuses) With respect and cordiality 
Sergio Saline I carry 
 
Original Message  
 
From: "Jose Ovid Salgueiro A." <jsalgueiro at cantv.net> 
To: "' Internautá Presidency" <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>; 
<cveraq at gmail.com>; "' Andrés Piazzá" <andrespiazza at gmail.com>; 
<lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
Cc: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> 
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:47 A.M. 
Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large 
 
 
We must be clear in a thing, the cause that is a Director 
designated by the users it does not mean at all that it is there stops 
to protect to us or to benefit to us. According to the ICANN statutes the directors 
they are there for making the decisions that benefit the organization. 
 
Even though the designated director had interest in favoring the users 
(against the statutory forecasts), a vote of 22 or 23 is single. 
 
Said this, it wanted to mention both with respect to candidates who are 
asked for the support of the THIN one to be postulated, not even it stops 
to support them, that if it comes I am in agreement with Adrián as far as 
qualifications of Avri Doria, shine to me outside place to askfor support in one 
community which never it took care of and with that never it interacted, to difference 
of JJ Subrenat that if it always supported it and it interacted with her. 
 
We were few the members of the THIN one that we interacted with these people and 
for that reason I believe that feedback is important east. 
 
 
 
 
Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. 
salgueiro.jo at gmail.com 
 
 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/259b419ba5.html
--]]