[lac-discuss-en] Voting Director AT Large

[Jacqueline Morris]

Hi everyone
Just wanted to remind you that the deadline date for supporting petitions
WAS Nov 7th. Only 2 RALOs supported the petitions for either JJS or AD, so
both petitions have failed. It is now too late for LACRALO to make a
decision to support either petition, so the discussion is moot with regard
to this election for Seat 15. However, the discussions may be useful in
LACRALO coming to an idea of process for the next round for director. And of
course this first run at the  process should  be reviewed, and the input
would be most useful.
Sincerely
Jacqueline

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:38 PM, <presidencia at internauta.org.ar> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>
> Subject: Re: Voting Director AT Large
> From: to presidencia at internauta.org.ar
>
> Dear Jose Ovid: Your email has made me reflect on some subjectsthat I
> create must
> of being high-priority at the time of entering to raise us the support to
> some person it stops
> to enter to board by the users.
>
> I understand that to who we give our endorsement him it must of being a
> person with a fort to loop
> with the end users of Internet.
> It must know in clearly that its function is to represent the users firmly
> and in freedom
> of action, with the only pressure of knowing how itself responsible to
> express opinions and positions
> that they respect them point of view that spill different the THIN ones.
> I am convinced that the work and the decisions that are taken in ALAC and
> the THIN ones by
> part of the users doubtlessly benefits the organization, I believe that to
> understand that
> what one becomes for benefit of the users is against ICANN, puts to us in a
> place
> incomodo and very undesirable.
>
> I continue insisting like the first day that our organization entranceto
> ICANN, that I inhale a
> a cuatripartito and egalitarian Co-government (academic companies, users,
> sectors and
> governments), but I am not foolish and also first passage seems to me
> important east that they are
> 1 voice against 22 or 23, since the important thing of that voice is that
> it can modify some
> position, can contribute with a glance of "user" the diverse forms to see
> the "World
> of Internet ", mainly the one of the Names and Numbers of Dominion, and
> also that can without
> place to doubts to cause that others to their side also accompany that same
> position.
>
> I do not understand but that we are voting.
> It will be perhaps that we are voting the entrance of a person who is not
> going to consider
> our vision, nor the necessities of the users? if it is thus sothat we would
> vote it?
> We would be in that line of thought choosing to our twig?
>
> On the other hand I ask myself on this interchange of mails that has
> followed one another in the list.
> There was no sufficient time so that are possible to be presented/displayed
> the candidates,
> There was also no a commission that I evaluate to those who appeared?
> It is good for the institucionalidad of ICANN that these three candidates
> appear
> untimely and by outside the evaluation commission? (I create to understand
> that thus it was
> but it is thus I request excuses)
> With respect and cordiality
> Sergio Saline I carry
>
> Original Message
>
> From: "Jose Ovid Salgueiro A." <jsalgueiro at cantv.net>
> To: "' Internautá Presidency" <presidencia at internauta.org.ar>; <
> cveraq at gmail.com>;
> "' Andrés Piazzá" <andrespiazza at gmail.com>;
> <lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Cc: <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:47 A.M.
> Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] Voting Director AT Large
>
>
> We must be clear in a thing, the cause that is a Director
> designated by the users it does not mean at all that it is there stops
> to protect to us or to benefit to us. According to the ICANN statutes the
> directors
> they are there for making the decisions that benefit the organization.
>
> Even though the designated director had interest in favoring the users
> (against the statutory forecasts), a vote of 22 or 23 is single.
>
> Said this, it wanted to mention both with respect to candidates who are
> asked for the support of the THIN one to be postulated, not even it stops
> to support them, that if it comes I am in agreement with Adrián as far as
> qualifications of Avri Doria, shine to me outside place to askfor support
> in one
> community which never it took care of and with that never it interacted, to
> difference
> of JJ Subrenat that if it always supported it and it interacted with her.
>
> We were few the members of the THIN one that we interacted with these
> people and
> for that reason I believe that feedback is important east.
>
>
>
>
> Jose Ovid Salgueiro A.
> salgueiro.jo at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/27ae8c65e7.html
> --]]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>


-- 
Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free.