[lac-discuss-en] Voting Director AT Large

[jsalgueiro at cantv.net]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: Voting Director AT Large
From: jsalgueiro at cantv.net

We must be clear in a thing, the cause that is a Director 
designated by the users it does not mean at all that it is there stops 
to protect to us or to benefit to us. According to the ICANN statutes the directors 
they are there for making the decisions that benefit the organization. 
 
Even though the designated director had interest in favoring the users 
(against the statutory forecasts), a vote of 22 or 23 is single. 
 
Said this, it wanted to mention both with respect to candidates who are 
asked for the support of the THIN one to be postulated, not even it stops 
to support them, that if it comes I am in agreement with Adrián as far as 
qualifications of Avri Doria, shine to me outside place to askfor support in one 
community which never it took care of and with that never it interacted, to difference 
of JJ Subrenat that if it always supported it and it interacted with her. 
 
We were few the members of the THIN one that we interacted with these people and 
for that reason I believe that feedback is important east. 
 
 
 
 
Jose Ovid Salgueiro A. 
salgueiro.jo at gmail.com  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ab5a8c678a.html
--]]