[lac-discuss-en] Could you clarify? =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F =

jsalgueiro at cantv.net jsalgueiro at cantv.net
Sat Apr 24 11:07:02 CDT 2010 

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: Could you clarify? =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F =
From: jsalgueiro at cantv.net

I was in Honduras and conocì to the people who administered hn.With 
the Co diciones of that pais and the resources of which 4.000 disponìan 
dominions were a barbarism. 
 
Honduras is not comparable in poblaciòn, development nor conditions 
econòmicas with others paìses of regiòn. 
 
 
JOS 
 
 
 
 
Original Message: 
 
From: Johnny Laureano johnnylaureano at yahoo.com 
Date: The Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:59:02 -0700 (PDT) 
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org, carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com, 
lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es][lac-discuss-in ] Could you clarify? 
=?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = 
 
 
Dear Carlos, 
  
In order to refer with respect to his singular punto to me of Vista, in previous 
oportunidad usted sumó solidariamente a expresiones of support to a ONG 
deprived Honduran, managing del ccTLD .ht., same that durante casi 20 
years, it administered only 4,000 dominios, I ask that remoterof 
interests of the users of Internet that this poor man result. I consider 
that it must be constant preoccupation that the interests of the organizations 
prevailed, in general,   does not collide with the interests of the users of 
Internet and we not only react by individual situations, for that reason my 
surprise. Therefore, I showed, that so he is opportune to develop one 
agenda with the LACTLD to raise alternatives and solutions that allow 
a greater access to the dominions ccTLD of the region, considering the stops 
costs and commercial strategies, based on its position of monopolies of 
facto (in LAC and Peru, for example), considering in addition 
 insignificant contributions that several administrators make of 
ccTDL to the ICANN, if it is that they make some contribution.I invite to him to lead 
this initiative, their knowledge on the subject and experiencecould be 
very useful for this proposal.  
  
Finally, I consider that always there will be space for the discussion. 
Cartagena, historical city of our brother country will be propitious place 
in order to talk on concrete subjects and those that consider pertinent. 
  
Kindly, 
  
Johnny L. 
AUI PERU - ALS 
 
--- On the Sat, 4/24/10, Carlos Aguirre <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote: 
 
 
From: Carlos Aguirre <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> 
Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ lac-discuss-in ] You could you clarify? 
=?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = 
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Date: Saturday, April 24, 2010, 8:57 A.M. 
 
 
 
Dear Johny: The question was towards Our common Antonio friendand 
I really create has sufficient capacity,y asi I recognize it, stops 
to answer by itself and to give me to the answer to the preoccupation that 
we felt many by the assumed attitude and defense of the interests 
corporative of a private company that this very far from the interests of 
the users, segun my particular point of view. In another orderme 
gustaria that You participated in the teleconferencings and the development of 
politicas for the region and in collaboration with ALAC but alla of single 
to appear to make a defense of which does not need it, confusing 
concepts and not contributing anything discucion raised. 
 
 
 
Ojala we pruned to find in December in meeting of Cartagena and power us 
to talk but on the individual. 
 
 
 
my greetings 
 
 
 
Carlos Dionisio Aguirreabogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina 
- 
* 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 
to www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar 
http://ar.ageiadensi.org  
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:25:22 +0000 > From: johnnylaureano at yahoo.com > To: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-in ] Could you clarify? 
=?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = >  >  > [ [ - - Translated text (is - &gt; in)--]] >  >  > Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=BFPodr=EDa_usted_clarificar=3F __?= 
=?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = > From: johnnylaureano at yahoo.com >  > Dear friends,  >       > In teleconferencing of day of yesterday, many preoccupationswere 
pronounced respect to the limited participation of the ALS of theregion, by 
communication problems I could not show to position on the to matter, but I was 
listening to until the end the to diver commitments to obtain to greater 
participation of the leaders of the ALS, good intention that decays greatly 
with personal the cuestionamiento of Carlos Aguiire to our friend Antonio 
Medina (Pdte of ACUI), to improper and treacherous cuestionamiento of a 
representative of to ALS against arepresentative of to anotherALS.  >       > Our Antonio friend,   is informed on the position into the ACUI and have 
referred to diver connections where one dog read all the antecedents that 
the Colombian State eats executing like part from hisestrategia for 
dominion ccTLD co.    >       > Some antecedents indicate the following thing:  >       > The failure of the Council of State of the 10 of July of 2002 ordered to 
the National Government - Ministry of Technologies of the Information and 
the Communications "to assume directly or by means of who it designates, 
within the pertinent legal frame, the administration and handling of 
dominio.co... "  >       > The Resolution 600 of 2002, by which the administration of dominio.co 
regulates itself partially established that the name of dominion of 
Internet, to under the code of country corresponding to Colombia.co, is a 
resource of the sector of the telecommunications, ofpublic interest, whose 
administration, maintenance and development will be to under the planning, 
regulation and control of the State, through the Ministry of Technologies 
of the Information and the Communications.  > Â    > Â    > It said it and it remembers to U.S., Jose Luis Barzallo, respectto the 
intervention limits of the ICANN and of the ALS including in our own 
countries, Â result that I a.m. safe they will reflect in thesurvey that 
Rudi Vansnick eats applying from the relations between theALSand los 
ccTLD of the region.  > Â    > Perhaps there am is opportune, in view of the results of this survey, from the 
point of view of the Latin American internauts, to develop anagenda with 
the LACTLD to raise alternatives and solutions that allow to to greater 
Access to the dominions ccTLD of the region, considering the high costs and 
commercial strategies, based on to their position de facto ofmonopolies (in 
Peru, for example).  > Â    > I a.m. in agreement with most of the initiatives obtaining to greater 
participation of the spilled ALS the day of yesterday, but I a.m. not in 
agreement with the irrespetuoso treatment of representativesof to ALS 
against to worthy one represents of the internauts of our to brother country of 
Colombia, for that reason I want to express my shared in common endorsement 
to him.  > Â    > Kindly,  > Â    > Johnny Laureano  > AUI PERU - ALS  > Â    > Â    > Â    > Â    >  > --- On Fri, 4/23/10, carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com 
<carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com> wrote:  >  >  > From: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com>  > Subject: Could you clarify?  > To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org  > Cc: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org  > Date: Friday, April 23, 2010, 8:32 A.M.  >  >  >  > [ [ - - Translated text (in - &gt; is)--]]  >  >  > Subject: Could you clarify?  > Of: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com  >  >  >  > Dear Antonio. After the thought mentioned by Alex. Him desire also asking 
which is the ACUI position, when the Co now is administered by the company 
deprived with very to diver interests that users of the end, without the 
participation of the users of the end ina national Bussiness,and how dog 
explain the fact that the Co will beuse like to cubical to centimeter (national 
dominion of the identification), and the commercial identificator? I a.m. 
really surprised for its words in the teleconferencing yesterday. Could you 
explain me? The situation is not to clear for and I worry itsrepresentation 
of the users of the end. You plows participating or some to other delutilizador 
representative of the end in desitions of ccTLD ofthe Co? Which was the 
participation of the users of the legal end in definitions ofthe structure 
of ccTLD (also used like gTLD)? Of what maneraestà n  > protected rights of users of the end? You!  >    (same you or its ALS) receives to certain "contribution" of 
administrator of the Co? Why you made the propaganda of Co infacebook? Plow 
you interested in a growth of the company? and in this marries porquÃ&copy;?  >  > Carlos Aguirre  >  > _________________________________________________________________  > Easy very of there am is of the meetings to organize with of Hotmailand 
Calendar: invitations and I received confirmations of attendanceof 
enviÃ.  > http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/calendar.aspx  > _______________________________________________  >  >  >  >  > [ [ - - Original text (in)  > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ç7eb2fa78.html  > --]]  >  >  >  >  > -----Inline Attachment Follows  >  >  > _______________________________________________  >  >  >  >  > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6fab0f979d.html > --]] >  >  >  
                           
_________________________________________________________________ 
With Windows Live Mail chequeá your Hotmail and other accounts of email without being 
connected. I discovered more. 
http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/mail.aspx 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c98159ceb5.html
--]]

More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list