[lac-discuss-en] =?iso-8859-1?q?resumen_respuestas_sobre_Usuarios = =?iso-8859-1?q?_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 =
sylvia at internautabrasil.org
sylvia at internautabrasil.org
Tue Aug 4 06:56:18 CDT 2009
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?resumen_respuestas_sobre_Usuarios = =?iso-8859-1?q?_Finales_en_relaci=F3n_a_NgTLD_y_IPv6 =
From: sylvia at internautabrasil.org
Dear companions of Lacralo:
since it had promised to them here is the summary of all the answers that
I obtained when asking to them you and members of other organizations
Brazilian, the following thing:
* How they are going to affect to the End users of our respective ones
countries the introduction of nGTLD
* And in what it is going to benefit or to harm the change of the IPv4 for
IPv6
New gTLD
Most of the answers they agree in which the pluses
interesados/beneficiados they will be the companies and I say will be because, to not being
the Registrant most of the commercial companies does not know that that
it is treating in ICANN, nor know that soon they could have his own one
gTLD. Although due to the high such single value of great companies will be able
to dare to have gTLD.
Of the side of the End user little or practicamente nothing we will have to win.
Including some they responded the opposite to me, who the User would have much
that to lose! See the following examples:
If bank were created it is logical to hope that all those that they buy
dominion bank will be banks financial institutions, or at least he is that
what the final Usuário is going to think!
And that can bring two great problems, first that will be facil stops
hakers to deceive the User causing who thinks that to connect itself to one
Page that always finishes with bank will be a bank or a safe place stops
to make financial transactions secondly and that can create
attack sector common (single point of failure) whoever to attack
to the banking organizations without taking the work from knowing the name of each
one of them, thing that does not happen (is dificil) with com or with
ccTLD. and would the same pass with gay or some similar thing with one
certain political or religious direction, those people could be
easily attacked or censured to be all meetings in that gTLD.
IPv4- IPv6
All the /comentarios answers with respect to the IP¨v6 are unanimous when indicating
that it is a natural process to the wearing down and exhaustion of the IPv4. and that
it will allow the growth of the network.
The forecasts indicate that the free directions in IPv4 will be exhausted in
2011 ou 2013. And without new numbers IP he would be very complicated to connect to
new users of Internet.
Prevee that both, IPv4 and IPv6, work side to side in Internet during
many years, but in the long run the IPv6 will be the unique one to being used. This would be
very important since one of the answers indicates that some users
end could be harmed with this change. Let us suppose the smallones and
medium companies of telecommunications of Latin America that take care of
distant regions of gandes urban centers. For them the impact will be
very hard and until for some devastating being able to disappear and generating
consequently social unemployment and problems. Also we must have
in account, for example, the Telecentros that uses software old,
these will not work with IPv6, having thus been able to even cause more exclusion
digitalis. The key would be the padronización of the technology so that all
can benefit from the best possible way. "the technological Changes
they must be responsible "
Here in Brazil, the IPv6 already was adopted by NIC.br. In theNIC network. br
access to the Google via IPv6, for example, already is activated. In agreement with
Berthier Ribeiro-Neto, Director of engineering of Google, "this
first IPv6 connection of the company in Latin America and indicates
preoccupation that the company has with the adoption in scale of the new one
protocol "
Those that is interested in knowing more of these subjects:
<http://ipv6.google.com/> http://ipv6.google.com.
In LACNIC very active work group exists um on this subject that envia
weekly summaries:
Plows you ready for IPv6?
<http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5131>
http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5131
Five of the Biggest IPv6-Based Threats Facing CIOs
<http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5129>
http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5129
IPv6 hair net traffic poses serious network threat
<http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5128>
http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroom&id=5128
>From the LACNIC group also I took these information in which atalks about
the attitudes of some governments before the adoption of the IPv6:
These are some examples of paises that have taken initiatives to support
the unfolding of IPv6:
Japan: it focuses mainly his actions in supporting, creating and to finance two
assemblies of diferecniadas initiatives affluent:
- IPv6 Promotion Council ( <blocked::http://www.v6pc.jp/en/index.phtml>
http://www.v6pc.jp/en/index.phtml)
- Initiatives of R+D that include the companies, academic sector e
industries, such as Project WIDE, KAME, Usagi, etc. and the network of
education: Japan Gigabit Network.
In the U.S.A. the unfolding of IPv6 is a governmental mandate. In August
of the 2005, the Office of Direction and Budget of the U.S.A. (OMB) emitted
the Memorando M-05-22, "Planning of the Transition to ProtocolInternet
Version 6 (IPv6)"assigning by mandate the unfolding of IPv6 in
backbones of the networks of the federal governmental agenciesof
The U.S.A. for June of the 2008.
Malaysia: It makes two main actions:
- of Energy Establishes the National council IPv6 under Ministry, Water and
Communication (MEWC), to provide the vision, mission and strategic plan stops
the implementation of IPv6 in Malaysia.
- Next to USM (Universiti Sains Malaysia) and other organisms of
investigation and development work from year 2005 so that Malaysian it is
a nation "IPv6-enabled" towards year 2010, planning for it
programs of diffusion and training on IPv6.
France: Here the recommendations come on the part of the IPv6 TF that was
impelled by the government, and it has between his members nothing less than: 6WIND,
AFNIC, Alcatel, France Télécom R&D, G6, RENATER, Renault.
Such recommendations were presented/displayed the Minister of Investigation and
New Tecnologias:
<blocked::http://www.fr.ipv6tf.org/DATA/PRESS/Recommandations IPv6 TFF
(English).pdf >
http://www.fr.ipv6tf.org/DATA/PRESS/Recommandations%20IPv6%20TFF%20(English)
pdf
But information: <http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/es/ipv6/ipv6-en/gobierno>
http://portalipv6.lacnic.net/es/ipv6/ipv6-en/gobierno
That is everything so far, any doubt or to send infomaciones to me of his
region, I am to disposition
Greetings,
Sylvia
_______________________________________________________________
Sylvia Herlein Leite - Brazil Internaut
_____
Of: sylvia-internautabrasil [ mailto:sylvia at internautabrasil.org ]
Shipment command post: second-feira, 20 of julho of 2009 10:00
It stops: ' lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org'
Assunto: HEAD OF CATTLE: work group Raiz Zone
Dear companions of Lacralo;
without a doubt some that the subject of Zone Root is very technician and most of
things escape to the understanding of the end user, but this has served to me
in order to know enough this subject and I am going to share it with you.
Therefore our group will not be able, of this time and until the 31/07, to make
no contribution from the end users to the 3 organisms that are
ordered of this subject.
Although I have found several pages and other they have been recommended me by
very interesting members of the list and I try to make a summary stops
to share it with you.
On the other hand I am making a rise of opinions here in
Brazil, about the 2 questions that I sent to them in my firstmessage:
* How they are going to affect to the End users of our respective ones
countries the introduction of nGTLD
* And in what it is going to benefit or to harm the change ofthe IPv4 for
IPv6
Although the 2 subjects are things already decided, they are being very
interesting the answers that I am obtaining ytambién of thisthem
I promise a summary.
He would be interesting which you they the same do in paises and to join all
the information.
I wait its commentaries and helps!
Greetings to all.
Sylvia
_______________________________________________________________________
Sylvia Herlein Leite
Brazil Internaut
_____
Of: sylvia-internautabrasil [ mailto:sylvia at internautabrasil.org ]
Shipment command post: sixth-feira, 17 of julho of 2009 11:06
It stops: ' lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org'
Assunto: work group Raiz Zone
Dear companions of Lacralo;
In the teleconferencing of we yesterday were in agreement to form groups of
work on the opened subjects to discussion.
One of the subjects that are open to commentaries in ICANN until the 31 of
2009 July, is Studies on Raiz Zone.
The Meeting of ICANN asked for the Consultative Commission of system of servers
root (RSSAC), to the Consultative Commission of security and stability (SNCC), and
to the personnel of the ICANN to study the potential impact on
stability of the zone root that arises when the address registers
IPv6, IDN superior level names, new dominions of first level,and
new registries of support to the DNS security are added to the zone of
root.
Without a doubt that all these changes will produce a global effect on
operations of zone by roots. In answer to the request of the Meeting, these
organisms formed a group of direction and organization of a study
trim. The reach of this study includes all the aspects of
operations of zone root. By Zone root of operations it is understood all
aspects of the zone root of production of data, compilation, publication a
the servers root, etc.
Being a subject very technician, that he escapes to my condition of end user, me
I will occupy, like me has suggested it Jorge Amodio, to determine the effect that
it is going to produce in the end user of Internet these subjects.
We in Lacralo are forming a group to see this subject of the side
of the end user. I hope that they accompany to me in this arduous task and ours
region can contribute its grain of sand to these so complex subjects. Those that
be interested in participating please make contact with enemywith me:
<mailto:sylvia at internautabrasil.org> sylvia at internautabrasil.org
.
Some of the things that we would have to find out would be:
* How they are going to affect to the End users of our respective ones
countries the introduction of nGTLD
* And in what it is going to benefit or to harm the change ofthe IPv4 for
IPv6
* I wait its commentaries
*
Greetings,
Sylvia Herlein Leite
Brazil Internaut
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/34061ec626.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list