[lac-discuss-en] declaration Brazil Internaut
apisan at servidor.unam.mx
apisan at servidor.unam.mx
Tue Jun 16 16:36:48 CDT 2009
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: declaration Brazil Internaut
From: apisan at servidor.unam.mx
Andrés,
with the greater clarity I have dealt to insist - since I did it energetically
in the teleconferencing of yesterday - in which we happen to substance subjects that
serve stops:
1. to begin to educate our community, that to date does not know
real subjects of which ICANN takes care (something that lamentably was reiterated
explicitly the day of yesterday);
2. to let appear like scrounger interested more in
boleto/ticket/billete to attend the discussion that in which we can
to contribute and learning of the discussion;
3. to assure that our place to the table comes from the recognition to
contribution and not of a system of quotas, that always will be unstable
in addition to I infuriate;
4. TO SERVE OUR COMMUNITIES, WHICH WE SAY TO REPRESENT, like
consequence of the previous thing.
I ratify the abstention from ISOC Mexico.
It counts the votes and it emits the declaration that these allows you; if you have
a majority, like so, and if no, under personal responsibility,the consensus
and the shades of the same one that you detect.
Warm greeting to all.
Alexander Pisanty
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dr Alexander Pisanty
UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732
* My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
* LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
* Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614
---->> Unete to ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Andres Piazza wrote:
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:07:39 +0000 > From: Andres Piazza <andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com> > To: sylvia at internautabrasil.org, lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] declaration Brazil Internaut > > > > Sylvia Thanks, I am glad that that outside your answer. Not only by your own position but for the rest of the ALS, the summary he is very clarificador. > Creo that LACRALO must support this statement and I would like that we pruned to make an informal voting in the list, that simply expresses the general consensus of LACRALO. > > Since President I have been able to engage in a dialog with most of you and allow to say that this text of Cheryl, as Sylvia raises well, reflects most of our positions. > > Alexander Pisanty in its abstention from Even showed its intention that yesterday he is not exactly this something that clears time and effort to us. I did not listen to substantial objections thistext. > > If it seems to them, we can have a con!
sensus to support statement. You will say. > > Greetings > > Andrés Piazza > President of LACRALO > > > From: sylvia at internautabrasil.org > > To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:59:17 -0300 > > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] declaration Brazil Internaut > > > > Dear companions, > > > > In the teleconferencing I yesterday committed myself to send a declaration > > explaining the abstention from Brazil Internaut... > > > > is Here: > > > > > > > > Sabemos that ICANN from the beginning of the existence of the Thin ones has done and > > continues making great investments to make participate andlisten to the voice > > of the End users of Internet. > > > > Also we know of the wonderful and untiring work that the president of > > ALAC, Cheryl, comes making. > > > > Our abstention in the voting made in the Teleconferencing,was > > the fear of the nonpossibility of participating in!
the Meetings of ICANN in his > > totality when these are m!
ade in o
ur region. Since we considered of > > vital importance of participating nonsingle in the GeneralAssembly like of > > factories that are organized, as well as of the Public Forum; being this the only one > > opportunity to interact with the Board. > > > > and this fear is founded: > > > > 1) in the reality of year 2008, when the LACRALO could notmake his > > General Assembly not to be specifically solicitd to be including > > in the budget of that year. > > > > 2) In the reading of page 7 of the following document, > > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/travel-support/draft-travel-support-guideline > > s-27may09-en.pdf > > > > 3) and by vague commentary-answer given by Kevin Wilson when him > > I commented on our preoccupation in the sense that the representatives > > of the single ALSs would have the opportunity to participate in the Assemblies > > General and not of the totality the meeting when these aremade in > > our r!
egion. As you can see in: > > https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?draft_fy10_operating_plan_and_budget_11_ > > june_2009 > > > > > > > > Rereading the document > > http://www.atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge/alac-travel-policy-for-volunteers > > -24mar09-en.pdf, we see that these points are being considered reason why > > Brazil Internaut retires the abstention to the document showed yesterday, 15 of > > June in the monthly teleconferencing of the LACRALO. And we supported the document > > proposed by the president of Alac, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, referring to > > support of trips for the voluntary members of ALAC. > > > > > > > > immediately, > > > > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > > > Brazil Internaut > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Stay up to dates on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phonewith Live Windows >!
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/ > __________!
________
_____________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://www.lacralo.org >
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/10a77a1b15.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list