[lac-discuss-en] proposed GNSO group "CyberSafety Constituency" devoted to censorship?

[Carlton Samuels]

Dev:
We are firmly opposed to any involvement of ICANN in content regulation.
This is why I strongly condemned the Morality and Public Order Objection in
the gTLD process and involved myself in drafting the official ALAC response
to it at Paris.

This is where I stand and shall remain.

Carlton Samuels

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh
<admin at ttcsweb.org>wrote:

> Via the IGP blog at
> http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html
>
> is the mention that the proposed CyberSafety Constituency (
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#cybersafety)
> is "an extension of the CP80 Foundation ( <http://www.cp80.org>
> http://www.cp80.org/). CP80 is devoted to systematic, global censorship of
> internet content in order to eradicate pornography."
>
> In my opinion, ICANN should not be involved with content regulation.
> Thoughts?
>
> Dev Anand Teelucksingh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>