[lac-discuss-en] ALAC 2nd Session? Community

[rmedina at alfa-redi.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: ALAC 2nd Session? Community
From: rmedina at alfa-redi.org

Dear Sergio: 
 
Of prudent with your request of information on the ICANN meeting.   
He would be interesting to know some details of the meetings, to the margin   
of all the information that can be found in the Web. 
 
Of another side, I would like to know the reasons by which ours   
representatives of the LACRALO must take like mandate the nomination of   
Andrés. I do not have left the reason for it clear and I am not sure that that   
be a usual practice in other THIN, but clear I can be mistaken. 
 
Finally to indicate to the members of the list of the LACRALO that Alpha   
Redi does not subscribe, supports or does his the rough draft of policy letter   
of trip (or as you call?participación well) in Icann. 
 
Warm greetings, 
 
Ruddy Medina 
Redi Alpha 
 
 
 
presidency Internaut wrote: > Dear representing companions of LACRALO: podria some of you > to inform to us on the subjects treated in reunion of today 4 of November about > 20087 in ALAC? I have wanted to enter and to be impossible to be able to see me or > to listen to nothing in marinates acrobat. > On the other hand I want to propose that both representing of the LACRALO they take > like mandate the nomination of Andres Piazza to be liasson of mobi (dot > mobi). if nobody is against this gustaria me that silence isinterpreted > in this ocacion as an express mandate to our representativeson this > point. > Envio in case they do not remember our companions the final document > on the "politicas of participation of ICANN" (badly called "the politicas ones > of trips"), which this but down, if some of our companions > needs I can send it by electronic mail or e to it pdf > warm greetings > Sergio > > POSITION OF LACRALO BEFORE THE NEW POLITICAS OF PARTICIPATION OF ICANN ( > !
 BADLY TRIP CALLS POLITICAS) > > the participant organizations of the Civil Society of ICANN,we have taken > knowledge of the decision that has taken east organism to change the form > of PARTIPACION in the same one. > > > Who we formed part of organizations ALS we considered that > political of trips has a close relationship with the participation of > Usuary of Internet in ICANN, reason why we rejected emphatically > decision that is that attempt to the policies and principlesfrom ICANN and by > of Internet. > > > we talked about badly to called "the political ones of trips" ". > > > > Entendemos that this is thus, so that this in game the fact not to travel, > but the total potentiality of participation of the civil society in this > organism. > > > we are convinced that the participation in ICANN implies theinteraction > between governments, companies and users to be able to counton an organization > that directs the destinies of Internet in right and democratic form. > !
 > > we did not conceive but in this only sense the participati!
 onof the
 society > civil like representatives of the end users of Internet, within > ICANN-Consideramos that ICANN has responded until now to theexpectations > raised, opening to the participation of the OSC like part ofa process > formativo that demands the incorporation of all the actors who participate > in the life of Internet. > > > Therefore, every day, is more important obtaining than others > organizations are gotten up in the real decision making. > > > If one looks for a greater participation must surpass the limitations > that until now makes difficult the decision making. Althoughin > the present time has meetings by teleconferencing, this one means of > communication is limited as opposed to the decision making from the ALS in > the actual meetings according to which they arrange our statutes. > > > Is imperative by virtue of the search of consensuses, that ICANN looks for others > average of reduction of costs. > > > Entendemos that one of them could be to trim the cos!
 ts of > representation of the structures of governments, since well they could > to support the costs of participation based on the interestsof each one > of the countries in taking part in the global policies of communication. > > > > we are convinced that a this serious way solid and been worth of construction > political you publish of each one of the states with respectto the TICS, > prioritizing the transparency of management, economic independence, sovereignty > political and the self-determination of the towns, like cannot be waived norms > of the countries at the time of the confrontation of ideas and proposals that prioritize > the interests of all the humanity and the towns in individual. > > > Is important that the weakest sector is had the charge of in their participation, already > that in ICANN occurs the fact that two strong sectors participate from > economic (companies and governments) and one weak one (ALS), is necessary > to safeguard the rights of the ma!
 jorities (the Users of Internet), that > finds as opposed to i!
 n a posi
tion of inequality the powerful ones. > > > the history of our region has demonstrated that the work tous between > different representative sectors from the democratic life, have affirmed > value of the plurality. > > > > we do not understand the total and pertinent participation without the three > valued estates of representation are seated in equality of > conditions and possibilities, that is to say, a true World-wide government of > Internet with egalitarian tripartite representation, between States, Companies > and End users of Internet. > > > Is why we insisted on the total participation of how until now > we have participated and we did not resign to the rights acquired in ICANN by > the Users of Internet. > > > > Must be adopted political effective to avoid the concentration of > information and the decisions of the policies in ICANN. If few have > the possibility of controlling the information is not possible a participation > total and pertinent. > > > Entendemos!
  that the reduction in the possibility of participation of > End users of Internet conspires against the democratic system > established in ICANN. Since when restricting the plurality and diversity that > assures the total exercise the right to the information andparticipation of > the users causes a scene of social injustice. > > > > Those that it has more discuss and participate and those that less they have and more contribute > to the system is outside the world of the debates and the construction of one > Internet better. > > > For these reasons we ratified ourselves in the search of a participation > egalitarian that improves the fulfillment of the ICANN objectives and therefore > of the Users of Internet and we hoped that the decision is reverted in > please the real participation of the end users of Internet in this > structure of world-wide participation of the destinies of Internet. 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/706229cc64.html
--]]