[Finance-sc] Fast track vs. normal track requests

Thompson, Darlene DThompson1 at GOV.NU.CA
Thu Mar 28 13:38:47 UTC 2013

NARALO has been really scrambling on this, too.


Darlene A. Thompson
CAP Administrator
N-CAP/Department of Education
P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
Iqaluit, NU  X0A 0H0
Phone:  (867) 975-5631
Fax:  (867) 975-5610
dthompson at gov.nu.ca
From: finance-sc-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [finance-sc-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Cheryl Langdon-Orr [langdonorr at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 12:37 AM
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Cc: ICANN AtLarge Staff; Finance and Budget SubCommittee
Subject: Re: [Finance-sc] Fast track vs. normal track requests

Well particularly  as APRALO meets  last week of the month  this  did have
an effect on our Leadership I suspect  so I guess I should  be saying  YES
to the proposed additional round...
*Cheryl Langdon-Orr ...  **(CLO)*

On 26 March 2013 11:25, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:

> Dear members of the Finance & Budget sub-committee,
> a recent discussion with one of the RALO leaderships made it appear that
> they were really rushed to go through their internal processes to
> approve requests. Perhaps it was a lack of communication from members of
> the FBSC to their region, perhaps it was just the fact that we had less
> than one month to put together the budget requests.
> As you'll note on the ICANN Finance WIKI, there are actually two deadlines:
> https://community.icann.org/display/projfinadhocws/At+Large+-+FY14+Special+Budget+Request
>       Deadlines:
>   *
>           Early vote/decision by April => submit by 3/22/2013
>   *
>           Vote/decision by June => submit by 4/29/2013
> In order to save ourselves from needed to frantically work immediately
> after the ICANN meeting in April, the request from RALOs to send their
> requests was aligned with the fast track. This put pressure on them to
> get their proposals done fast - but some might have forgotten about
> requests which would not need a fast track.
> As a result, I am asking you, members of the FBSC, whether we should
> open a new round of RALO requests, if they wish to add any request that
> would take place from November 2013 onwards -- hence using the "Normal
> Track".
> If this is the case, then Gisella has already prepared a placeholder for
> a call on 22 April 2013 - and we *could* use this call to:
> 1. follow-up on any follow-up requests from Finance on our initial round
> 2. discuss the second round of requests
> Any suggestions?
> Kind regards,
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> Finance-sc mailing list
> Finance-sc at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/finance-sc
Finance-sc mailing list
Finance-sc at atlarge-lists.icann.org

More information about the Finance-sc mailing list