Especially as this could always be extended if that were required...<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 04/04/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Vittorio Bertola</b> <<a href="mailto:vb@bertola.eu">vb@bertola.eu</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">All,<br><br>I see that the discussion is again getting polarized - with people<br>stacking on the two extreme options.
<br><br>Would the middle ground of April 22 be acceptable to everyone? So that<br>we can close the discussion and start discussing nominations.<br><br>The only other option is to stick to the process agreed in Lisbon, which
<br>is the default if we can't agree to change it. But I really think that<br>if we all are reasonable, then we can find a compromise that is good for<br>everyone.<br><br>So, does anyone really object to April 22?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>--<br>vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <--------<br>--------> finally with a new website at <a href="http://bertola.eu/">http://bertola.eu/</a> <--------<br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>EURO-Discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org">EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br><a href="http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org">
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>-- <br>Regards,<br> <br>Nick Ashton-Hart<br>PO Box 32160<br>London N4 2XY<br>United Kingdom
<br>UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011<br>USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460<br>Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135<br>mobile: +44 (7774) 932798<br>Win IM: <a href="mailto:ashtonhart@hotmail.com">ashtonhart@hotmail.com</a> / AIM/iSight: <a href="mailto:nashtonhart@mac.com">
nashtonhart@mac.com</a> / Skype: nashtonhart<br>Online Bio: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart">https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart</a>