[EURO-Discuss] R: R: Proposal procedure active- non-active ALSes

[Wolf Ludwig]

Thanks for these inputs to our current debate, Christopher. I think they are useful for framing further discussions by avoiding formalist solutions. Any further feedbacks are highly welcome!

Kind regards,
Wolf


Christopher Wilkinson wrote Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:19
>Good evening:
>
>1.	ALAC exercises its mandate as representing the larger community of  
>ALS and other At Large.
>	ALAC is already a rather small, high level group whose credibility  
>depends entirely on their accountability and responsiveness to At  
>Large, at large.
>
>2.	Apparently there are busy ALS and less busy ALS in the ICANN  
>context. (Bearing in mind that most ALS have other businesses to deal  
>with at home.)
>	But beware of imposing performance criteria on ALS and threatening  
>dis-creditation. It would be better to use ICANN support to reactivate  
>or re-prioritise the ALS in question.
>	
>3.	Regarding the decision-making process and the 'quorum', few  
>decisions need to come to a vote. It would be better to relativise the  
>quorum: strong quorum for a few important issues; weaker quorum for  
>routine decisions.
>
>CW
>
>
>On 21 Aug 2012, at 19:33, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>EURO-Discuss mailing list
>EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
>
>Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
>

EuroDIG Secretariat
http://www.eurodig.org/
mobile +41 79 204 83 87
Skype: Wolf-Ludwig

EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
http://euralo.org

Profile on LinkedIn
http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig