[EURO-Discuss] Fwd: [At-Large] ANNOUNCEMENT: Results from Round 1 voting for At-Large selected Board Member for seat #15 of ICANN Board
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Fri Nov 26 10:10:14 UTC 2010
Well, we don't have an option to abstain, at least not on the ballot.
"Abstention" was by not taking part in the vote, and who knows if
that was intentional or not (none votes tend to be because people
forgot or had some technical issue.) In this case 3 people
"abstained".
I agree with you about None Of the Above. Next time I hope.
As for direction carrying to the second round, I am pretty sure this
was discussed some months ago on an EURALO call, but don't remember
the outcome (if any.) I think when it was discussed we might have
been anticipating a different voting method, anyway, expect someone
with a better memory will have an answer.
I would like to know as I did not see the vote from the ALSes in time
for it to influence how I voted.
Adam
At 9:59 AM +0100 11/26/10, Avri Doria wrote:
>Dear Adam,
>
>On 26 Nov 2010, at 07:03, Adam Peake wrote:
>
>> Or does this close result mean all of us, Wolf
>> included, are free to vote as we think best?
>
>
>I always thought that should be that case for all in all rounds, so
>certainly believe it should be in round 2.
>
>I also think the abstention is always a good bet and must say I was
>happy to see it.
>
>Though to be fair, i think every election should include: None Of
>the Above on every ballot. And when NOA wins or even comes in
>second, then one rethinks the whole process.
>
>But that is just me, and totally beside the point except as a note
>to those who will be doing the post-mortem on this 'election'.
>
>a.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>EURO-Discuss mailing list
>EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
>
>Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
More information about the EURO-Discuss
mailing list