[EURO-Discuss] REMINDER: EURALO Call Tuesday, 15 December 17:00 UTC

[Wolf Ludwig]

Hi,

for the moment, there are only Bill, Sébastien and me who confirmed for 
tomorrow's call; Adam and Dessi apologised already.

IMO, it makes no sense to have a call just for three people (having a dinner 
together would be better ;-). If there are no confirmations any more (let's 
say 5 - 7 at least) until tonight, I suggest that Matthias sends a Doodle poll 
for finding an appropriate day and time in the 2nd week of January.

Thanks and regards,
Wolf


Adam Peake wrote Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:55:
>Hi,  I doubt I'll be able to make the call.  I'm in the US at the
>moment, get back to Tokyo sometime on Monday an a call at 2am the next
>day would probably kill me!  But who knows, jet lag's a mean thing!
>
>Dessi, thanks for the minutes.
>
>Best,
>
>Adam
>
>
>On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:31 PM, William Drake
><william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2009, at 12:37 AM, Wolf Ludwig wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> thanks a lot, Dessi, for writing and uploading the minutes from the last teleconf.!
>>
>> Indeed, very helpful notes for those of us who alas missed it, thanks.
>>
>> I agree with those who suggested that the role of individual users should be addressed, this issue has been lingering unresolved since we started, and is relevant to the discussion about how to elect the ALAC board member.*
>>
>>> I also want to support Dessi's remarks having our next monthly call at the date
>>> of  next Tuesday 15 December 09, as suggested by the Staff
>>> -- IF there will be enough participants.
>>>
>>> Just in case, I would like to suggest to postpone the call by 1 hour to 18:00 CET
>>> because I will be in a meeting in Berne and cannot return before 18:00 CET.
>>
>> I can participate, although 17:00 CET would have been easier.
>>
>>
>> *BTW I'm wondering if someone can inform me about something Evan said on the ALAC list regarding the election:
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2009, at 6:19 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>>
>>> . A decisive majority within At-Large(*) has expressed a preference
>>> for the 20-vote option in which most -- but not all -- the voters are ALAC
>>> members.
>>>
>>> (*) - Actually, every region except NARALO has expressed this preference.
>>
>> When did we express this preference, can someone point me to a text, URL, whatever?  I don't recall the discussion and decision, may have missed a meeting/memo...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EURO-Discuss mailing list
>> EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>EURO-Discuss mailing list
>EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
>

comunica-ch
phone +41 79 204 83 87
Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
www.comunica-ch.net

Digitale Allmend
http://blog.allmend.ch -

EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
http://euralo.org