[EURO-Discuss] PROPOSED TELECONFERENCE

[Rudi Vansnick]

As far as I can read in the agenda proposed by Nick, there is no voting 
tomorrow.
There for I see no reason for further delay. We have already been 
discussing items and topics which were very clear and had enough 
timespan being read by everyone considering the EURALO kick-off in 
priority of some other work.

I had also to organise myself in order to participate in what I consider 
being an important item in the agenda of *my daily work for the Internet 
community, listening to all and any Internet individual user.*

rudi

Jeanette Hofmann schreef:
> Hi,
> if it is indeed true that many ALs cannot participate tomorrow, it would 
> be good to restrain from taking binding decisions.
>
> As the decisions taken in Lisbon have shown, it can somewhat poison the 
> atmosphere if those physically present make decisions that don't reflect 
> the preferences of those absent. For this very reason, IETF working 
> groups don't vote in physical meetings or teleconferences, they use 
> mailing lists for polls and the like to ensure that all interested 
> parties have a chance to participate.
>
> jeanette
>
>
> Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
>   
>> >From the email replies sent to the list, this time and date were the
>> best - more people could do this time and date than any of the others
>> - which is why we set it that way.
>>
>> If nobody else will propose an agenda, what I would suggest as a draft is:
>>
>> 1) Discuss and agree the list of candidates - including whether or not
>> to include candidates who were proposed after the deadline.
>>
>> 2) Discuss and agree the total number of board seats for this election cycle.
>>
>> 3) Discuss and agree the length of the voting, the start date, and the
>> provisional list of voters and the number of days for ALSes not on the
>> call to provide their authorised voter.
>>
>> We would then bring the results of these items back to the list, not
>> for review, but as decisions.
>>
>> I will put this up on the Wiki as the *DRAFT* agenda which all ALSes
>> may then edit or extend - so we have something to start from.
>>
>> On 03/05/07, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg op web.de> wrote:
>>     
>>> All,
>>> concerning the tel conf tomorrow: Many people said they cannot take part (myself offered a different time, one and a half hours earlier). Rudi and myself asked what it is about, as no one proposed an agenda yet. I proposed to discuss all issues online. I guess, the best is, that those who actually have the chance in taking part come up with a proposal for procedure which will be presented to all of us online.
>>> best
>>> annette
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rudi Vansnick schrieb:
>>>       
>>>> This fits for me ... if at least we will have a clear agenda and no
>>>> discussions about what is NOT written/signed in MoU and Bylaws.
>>>>
>>>> Rudi Vansnick
>>>> Chair ISOC Belgium
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> EURO-Discuss op atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>
>